(core) [S]cience absolutely positively can tell you about ethics and morality. Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species. There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances. So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information. So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality. And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive. Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good Quod erat demonstrandum Thus endeth the lesson. fin.
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
Our Natural Law is Sacred
Our Natural Law is Sacred. https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/26/our-natural-law-is-sacred/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-26 19:41:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232752518943379456
-
Our Natural Law is Sacred.
P-Law criminalizes (a) bringing a bill to violate the natural law or the constitution before the legislatures, (b) advocating for, (c) even speaking about it in public, to the public. Our Natural Law is sacred. Even speaking of violating it means loss of sovereignty, lost of reciprocity under it, loss of rights under reciprocity, and loss of defense, exposing you to extra judicial punishment within the territory and letter of marque external to it. P-Law is harsher than islamic law.
-
Our Natural Law is Sacred.
P-Law criminalizes (a) bringing a bill to violate the natural law or the constitution before the legislatures, (b) advocating for, (c) even speaking about it in public, to the public. Our Natural Law is sacred. Even speaking of violating it means loss of sovereignty, lost of reciprocity under it, loss of rights under reciprocity, and loss of defense, exposing you to extra judicial punishment within the territory and letter of marque external to it. P-Law is harsher than islamic law.
-
Objective Measures of Good and Evil?
by Brandon Hayes
—“Do you believe there are any objective measures of good and evil?”—Tim Allen Musse
I would use the term Righteous and Evil. Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous Measures for a given action are put up against a test of reciprocity. Evil is harm done for harms sake. Good = Productive Bad = Unproductive Righteous is the extinguishing of Evil.
-
Objective Measures of Good and Evil?
by Brandon Hayes
—“Do you believe there are any objective measures of good and evil?”—Tim Allen Musse
I would use the term Righteous and Evil. Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous Measures for a given action are put up against a test of reciprocity. Evil is harm done for harms sake. Good = Productive Bad = Unproductive Righteous is the extinguishing of Evil.
-
Natural Rights
Natural Rights https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/natural-rights/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 21:24:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232416000173334529
-
Reciprocity and Irreciprocity
Reciprocity and Irreciprocity https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/reciprocity-and-irreciprocity/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 21:23:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232415826776592390
-
Reciprocity and Irreciprocity
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITYReciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity. MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake) … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain Amoral – no affect on others at gain. … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake) The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.
-
Reciprocity and Irreciprocity
RECIPROCITY AND IRRECIPROCITYReciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity. MORAL(ETHICAL) SPECTRUM … … … … Evil – interpersonal, extrapersonal, irreciprocity without gain (harm for harm’s sake) … … … Immoral – extrapersonal irreciprocity at gain … … Unethical – interpersonal irreciprocity at gain … Criminal – direct irreciprocity at gain Amoral – no affect on others at gain. … Recirpocal – direct reciprocity at gain … … Ethical – interpersonal reciprocity at gain … … … Moral – extrapersonal reciprocity at gain … … … … Good – interpersonal, extrapersonal, reciprocity without gain (investment, for investment’s sake) The constant relation in the spectrum is reciprocity by distance self, direct, indirect Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and warranted, within the limits of restitutability. Irreciprocity: Failing any one of the criteria for Reciprocity.