What Is Propertarianism: “The Law” https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/25/what-is-propertarianism-the-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 00:17:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253840546315014144
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
What Is Propertarianism: “The Law”
“The Natural Law of European Peoples”: A fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to the psychological(individual) and social(group) sciences using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity); thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program: sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth – and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets.
-
What Is Propertarianism: “The Law”
“The Natural Law of European Peoples”: A fully commensurable system of measurement across all disciplines that tests for reciprocity in display, word (truth) and deed (action); the extension of the logic of the physical sciences (realism, naturalism, equilibration) to the psychological(individual) and social(group) sciences using economic terms (acquisition, cooperation, reciprocity); thereby completing the scientific method (falsification of all dimensions possible human cognition); and thereby completing the Aristotelian program; and thereby providing the explanation for the success of western civilization under that program: sovereignty, reciprocity, and truth – and the markets that result from their universal enforcement, and the evolutionary velocity (adaptation, innovation) that results from those markets.
-
Example: Requirements for Violating P-Law of Speech
Example: Requirements for Violating P-Law of Speech https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/25/example-requirements-for-violating-p-law-of-speech/
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 00:16:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253840298968571906
-
Example: Requirements for Violating P-Law of Speech
—“Well, I’ve got a friend who’s really into manufacturing custom soaps. Let’s say she understates her soap expenses in a public space, because she’s embarrassed.”—
[T]hat’s In public, but not to the public, ad not about matters public. In other words no attempt to use the coercive powers of government nor to undermine the law limiting them, nor to pollute the informational commons, upon which the people depend. 1) not regular speech, but political speech: in public to the public in matters public. 2) I would expect lawyers to handle those in our existing court system, although I have recommended specialization of the court system, similar to the european court system where family, criminal, private, and public suits are separated. 3) Lawyers and judges and court officials are just as prosecutable under P-law as anyone else. So I expect that to shake up the industry. Marxists, postmodernists, feminists, etc, go to jail. Silly people are just silly.
-
Example: Requirements for Violating P-Law of Speech
—“Well, I’ve got a friend who’s really into manufacturing custom soaps. Let’s say she understates her soap expenses in a public space, because she’s embarrassed.”—
[T]hat’s In public, but not to the public, ad not about matters public. In other words no attempt to use the coercive powers of government nor to undermine the law limiting them, nor to pollute the informational commons, upon which the people depend. 1) not regular speech, but political speech: in public to the public in matters public. 2) I would expect lawyers to handle those in our existing court system, although I have recommended specialization of the court system, similar to the european court system where family, criminal, private, and public suits are separated. 3) Lawyers and judges and court officials are just as prosecutable under P-law as anyone else. So I expect that to shake up the industry. Marxists, postmodernists, feminists, etc, go to jail. Silly people are just silly.
-
Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not
Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not. https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/24/cooperation-is-only-preferable-until-it-is-not/
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 22:59:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253820836244529157
-
Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not.
White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation.”
-
Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not.
White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation.”
-
(Its hard to get in the habit but if you just use reciprocity and testimony, and
(Its hard to get in the habit but if you just use reciprocity and testimony, and property-in-toto as checklists, then most of the time you’ll discover that baiting into hazard is something we didn’t do so our law didn’t evolve to cover.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 21:19:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253795847675969540
Reply addressees: @judicialist @ComicDaveSmith
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253795336340082695
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@judicialist @ComicDaveSmith What if the court would not enforce non-payment of loans (only non payment of purchases). How would lender behavior change?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253795336340082695