Mar 31, 2020, 5:27 PM Very simple logic. Why should the strong not conquer, rape, pillage, and murder the weak? Because cooperation and numbers can be more rewarding over the long term. When are cooperation and numbers more rewarding than conquest, rape, pillage, and murder? When behavior is reciprocal. What does reciprocal mean? Do nothing that imposes costs upon the demonstrated interests of others either directly or indirectly – and conquer, rape, pillage, and murder anyone who does. And how do I do nothing that imposes costs upon the demonstrated interests of others either directly, or indirectly? Limit your display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, The consequence: the most moral condition humanity can possibly create. Such men are the gods among men.
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
What Is the Source of Morality if Not Xxxx?
Mar 31, 2020, 5:27 PM Very simple logic. Why should the strong not conquer, rape, pillage, and murder the weak? Because cooperation and numbers can be more rewarding over the long term. When are cooperation and numbers more rewarding than conquest, rape, pillage, and murder? When behavior is reciprocal. What does reciprocal mean? Do nothing that imposes costs upon the demonstrated interests of others either directly or indirectly – and conquer, rape, pillage, and murder anyone who does. And how do I do nothing that imposes costs upon the demonstrated interests of others either directly, or indirectly? Limit your display word and deed to productive, fully informed, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality, The consequence: the most moral condition humanity can possibly create. Such men are the gods among men.
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/within-the-limits-of-the-utility-of-cooperation/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:44:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265987377182498817
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
Mar 31, 2020, 8:27 PM Minor expansion of Natural Law
–“The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (ingroup defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (outgroups).”—
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” (ie: test of limits and full accounting.)
-
“Within the limits of the utility of Cooperation.”
Mar 31, 2020, 8:27 PM Minor expansion of Natural Law
–“The natural law is (+)Sovereignty and (-)Reciprocity, including reciprocity in speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the status(dominance, competence hierarch), within the limits of proportionality (ingroup defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (outgroups).”—
“Within the limits of the utility of cooperation.” (ie: test of limits and full accounting.)
-
Morality: There Is Nothing Complex to Understand
Morality: There Is Nothing Complex to Understand. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/morality-there-is-nothing-complex-to-understand-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:43:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265987097497792518
-
Morality: There Is Nothing Complex to Understand.
Apr 1, 2020, 9:09 AM The use of morality outgroup is only one of utility. The only moral imperative ingroup is reciprocity The only moral choice ingroup is christian tolerance and charity within the limits of that tolerance. Nothing else need be said.
-
Morality: There Is Nothing Complex to Understand.
Apr 1, 2020, 9:09 AM The use of morality outgroup is only one of utility. The only moral imperative ingroup is reciprocity The only moral choice ingroup is christian tolerance and charity within the limits of that tolerance. Nothing else need be said.
-
How Does P-Law Differ from Philosophy?
How Does P-Law Differ from Philosophy? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/how-does-p-law-differ-from-philosophy/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:41:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265986659243474944
-
How Does P-Law Differ from Philosophy?
Apr 1, 2020, 2:11 PM (core) You could call P-Law Operational Philosophy in the sequence of syllogistic reason > rationalism > set logic > operational logic > equilibrial logic (economic logic) 0) uses series (supply demand) vs ideals. 1) uses operational vs set logic 2) users ternary logic not binary (undecidable, truthful, false) 3) uses satisfaction of demand for infallibility not ideal truth 4) tests for deceits not just errors 5) tests for irreciprocity not just ‘good’ 6) tests for costs not just internal consistency 7) tests for closure by reality instead of just non-contradiction 8) tests for limits and full accounting. 9) tests for warranty of due diligence, liability, restitutability.