Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • By @LukeWeinhagen, Sr Fellow, The Natural Law Institute Innovation Signaling is

    By @LukeWeinhagen, Sr Fellow, The Natural Law Institute

    Innovation Signaling is no different from any other form of extractive signaling. It’s an attempt to capture the benefits of inclusion in a category without meeting the burden of meeting the standards for inclusion in the category.

    Signaling vs Demonstrating

    We keep trying to push back against a signal and it doesn’t work to stop the spread of degradation and degeneracy, because the signal is a trick.

    Virtue Signal vs Demonstrated Virtue

    Competence Signal vs Demonstrated Competence

    Investment Signal vs Demonstrated Investment

    Ownership Signaling vs Demonstrated Ownership

    Power Signal vs Demonstrated Power

    All of these tricks depend on, and literally can not exist without, leveraging the demonstrated behavior of the signal’s recipient for the benefit of the signaler. The signal does not produce the effect. Instead, the signal triggers the demonstrator’s compliance to produce the effect.

    Put another way – the signals are only effective to the degree the signaled population complies with the signal.

    We’re conflating compliance with cooperation.

    Because the institutions of the West are institutions of cooperation, our conflation of compliance as cooperation in the West provides all of these signals their strength.

    Not recognizing the distinction between compliance and cooperation makes the choke point strategy effective.

    Because “Plan. Organize. Fight. Win.” are all expressions of cooperation in the conflict of culture, and we believe we are already cooperating (when instead we’re complying), these coordinated actions will suffer until we can clearly recognize compliance and cooperation.

    Category Theft & Linguistic Parasitism via Extractive Signaling
    Detach the label used to identify a category then abuse the common understanding and/or misunderstanding of the label to strip-mine any benefit of inclusion with the category without the burden of meeting the standards or measures that define the category.

    Clarifying cooperation is essential to disrupting signal compliance. We do the science of cooperation at the @NatLawInstitute

    -Luke Weinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 00:44:01 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1812649283239456768

  • Correct. If you don’t follow me or the other people at the Natural Law Institute

    Correct. If you don’t follow me or the other people at the Natural Law Institute then you might want to. While we intentionally ‘appropriated’ the term natural law in the context of the founders, anglo common law, aquinas, and aristotle, our work consists of exactly what you propose: the unification of formal, physical, behavioral, political, and civilizational science (as you say ‘a physics of societies’). Our struggle is largely one of attempting to render it accessible to a college level audience. -cheers 😉

    Reply addressees: @MathPolice


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-14 17:31:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812540497698648064

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812539708272259360

  • Whlie you’re mostly right. I’ll bet I can change your opinion rather dramaticall

    Whlie you’re mostly right. I’ll bet I can change your opinion rather dramatically. See http://naturallawinstitute.com. Maybe we could set up a zoom chat? It’d be interesting for both of us and the audience.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-12 16:44:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811803923759452332

    Reply addressees: @sleepy_devo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811788996843827241

  • “We weren’t moral in the past because we didn’t know how to be, now we do” -Bran

    “We weren’t moral in the past because we didn’t know how to be, now we do”
    -Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-12 14:18:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811767110063845549

  • “You can only demonstrate you are truly good in the face of malincentives.”– B

    –“You can only demonstrate you are truly good in the face of malincentives.”– Brandon Hayes (@ThruTheHayes), President NLI.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 16:56:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811444425266016487

  • “You can only demonstrate you are truly good in the face of malincentives.”– B

    –“You can only demonstrate you are truly good in the face of malincentives.”– Brandon Hayes (@ThruTheHayes), President NLI.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-11 16:56:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1811444425198821376

  • Basic criticism is that rothbardian ethics are jewish ethics of the pale, escapi

    Basic criticism is that rothbardian ethics are jewish ethics of the pale, escaping responsibility for commons on the one hand and leaving open usury and baiting into hazard, and evasion of liabilty on the other.

    Basic criticism of hoppe, is that his ethics are those of the german Free Cities – which like both the jews of the pale, or the german free cities, or every other libertarian ‘fantasy’ depend on an empire letting a commercial trading city self regulate as long as it pays taxes to the crown.

    Both of these contrast with anglo ethics which require both commons, and self regulation, and self defense.

    Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-10 04:23:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810892679867199488

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810882160787661000

  • If you understand Austrian Economics (descriptive economics) and my/our work on

    If you understand Austrian Economics (descriptive economics) and my/our work on

    If you understand Austrian Economics (descriptive economics) and my/our work on Formal Natural Law (descriptive law) you’ll find more than an overlap – a consistency that legitimizes both as the science of cooperation.
    In this sense, despite my criticisms of Mises Rothbard and… https://t.co/9HX6mJMBnu


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-09 16:05:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810706933248131491

  • Free Will: the term Free Will (Stoicism: “liberum arbitrium”) arose in response

    Free Will: the term Free Will (Stoicism: “liberum arbitrium”) arose in response to the question as to whether individuals could be held responsible for making moral vs immoral decisions. It is not a religious concept but a greek one, and was incorporated by theologians in the second century.
    Determinism: The contemporary question cast as ‘free will’ is one of hard, or soft determinism.
    – Hard determinism must be false because even at first stages of causality the quantum background is indeterminate; and at the other end of spectrum of causal density, human autoassociative prediction (memory) is relatively non-deterministic outside of the very simple, which we can test easily. And human responses vary moment by moment given the internal biological market competition for demands for our attention and energy. We are extremely conscious of this fact in behavioral and micro economics: human behavior may be categorically similar in response to similar stimuli but isn’t individually predictable (consistent) regardless of that stimuli even at some of the extremes. As such we can explain human behavior once possessed of enough evidence (why juries function) but we cannot predict individual action.
    – Soft determinism must be true because humans are marginally indifferent outside the limits of cognitive, intuitionistic, and physical variation. In other words, all humans operate with similar physical, intuitionistic, and cognitive tools, varying by age, cognitive ability, accumulated knowledge and skill. Again this is why behavior is explainable but not predictable.

    Result: So the universe is deterministic in proportion to the accumulated information (oganization, or ‘memory’) available to any entity.
    It is deterministic and determinable at the small scales and simple interactions once we compensate for temperature and density.
    Its deterministic but indeterminable at scales where sufficient predictive memory exists in sufficiently complex density of opportunities to use mind, intiution, body, knowledge and resources.

    Error in prediction alone accounts for indeterminacy.

    Reply addressees: @RolandBasilides


    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-08 16:45:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810354566665310208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1810348972692693382

  • RT @WerrellBradley: We study and organize to Prevent Such Abuses Forever, at The

    RT @WerrellBradley: We study and organize to Prevent Such Abuses Forever, at The Natural Law Institute.

    Help us.

    The https://t.co/keQXKfP…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-06-29 18:30:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807119554134655251