Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Human Needs Aren’t Human Rights

    HUMAN NEEDS AREN’T HUMAN RIGHTS

    —“I can’t have a right to food, but I can have a right to eat.”– JWP

    There are no pre-existing fundamental rights. Only a natural demand for certain necessary rights. We can and do work together to produce those rights. What you mean is that it is beneficial. But one cannot POSSIBLY exercise a right that was not created by others, and one cannot possibly exercise a positive right that places demands upon others. As such all existentially possible rights are only via negativa: freedom from harm by others. There are many desirable GOODS that we might work together to obtain. There are however no existential rights no matter how much we pay wish there work (or lie that there are).

  • Human Needs Aren’t Human Rights

    HUMAN NEEDS AREN’T HUMAN RIGHTS

    —“I can’t have a right to food, but I can have a right to eat.”– JWP

    There are no pre-existing fundamental rights. Only a natural demand for certain necessary rights. We can and do work together to produce those rights. What you mean is that it is beneficial. But one cannot POSSIBLY exercise a right that was not created by others, and one cannot possibly exercise a positive right that places demands upon others. As such all existentially possible rights are only via negativa: freedom from harm by others. There are many desirable GOODS that we might work together to obtain. There are however no existential rights no matter how much we pay wish there work (or lie that there are).

  • The only Test Is Demonstrated Behavior

    The only Test Is Demonstrated Behavior https://t.co/uyOYHVOPgi

  • The only Test Is Demonstrated Behavior

    The only Test Is Demonstrated Behavior https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-only-test-is-demonstrated-behavior/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 15:02:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267471505987944452

  • The only Test Is Demonstrated Behavior

    —“Values testing to become a citizen of P-topia?”—Andrew M Gilmour

    The Propertarian Institute We don’t need to do anything except create a law, and universal standing, that prosecutes falsehood and irreciprocity such that we create a market for the prosecution of those who do so. The only test is demonstrated behavior. Let em in. Crucify the violators. Until there are no violators. In other words, common law is permissive with heavy punishment in order to allow the greatest fastest adaptation to opportunity. Continental law is reculatory and restrictive, with limited punishments in order to limit conflicts at the expense of adaptation to opportunity. Other law codes only get worse from continanal on down.

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei

    What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://t.co/rJrwEmmoYN

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Soverei

    What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty? https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/what-if-any-people-have-not-resisted-our-truth-telling-reciprocity-and-sovereignty/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 15:01:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267471240375218176

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?

    WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.

  • What if Any People Have Not Resisted Our Truth Telling, Reciprocity, and Sovereignty?

    WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY? What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century. Everyone wants consumption. No one wants responsibility. Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.

  • I Know What Bothers You About My Work.

    I KNOW WHAT BOTHERS YOU ABOUT MY WORK. —” I don’t propose a good, or a preference. I state a truth, and I state it prosecutorially, as natural law, that is not open to choice or dispute. Why? The Victorians civilized greek prose in continuation of their virtue signalling by overextension of christianity to justify their conquest. The marxists, feminist, postmodernists, and denialists took advantage of our kindness. They took advantage of our virtue signaling. Conservatives failed to resist them, Libertarians only resisted them in the economy, and science has only now falsified them. And they have sought to achieve by immigration and conflict I don’t make the same mistake. I don’t write appealing theology you want. I don’t write appeals empathically in moral philosophy to suggest. I don’t write empathic and rational appeals in secular philosophy to persuade. I write the law. The natural law. The only terms under which cooperation and compromise are preferable to conquest. I’m stating the only terms under which it is rational for us NOT to conquer, rule, tax, enserf, or enslave you, or worse. Europeans are done asking. They’re done tolerating. They’re done hoping. Science is proving us correct in human differences, just as it proved us correct in economics; just as it has proved us correct in politics. These are the terms of non conflict. And honestly, we are hoping you don’t accept them. You owe us 100M lives. I hope you are are ready to pay the debt. “—