Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Sovereigntarianism Requires Reciprocal Insurance: Love.

    SOVEREIGNTARIANISM REQUIRES RECIPROCAL INSURANCE: LOVE.

    —“There is a lot of brotherly love and care for each other over here. That’s a very noble thing in a world of radical individualism.”– Noah J Revoy

    We talk about rule of law, but that’s our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, leftist evil. We mention sovereignty, which is the objective. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire.

  • Sovereigntarianism Requires Reciprocal Insurance: Love.

    SOVEREIGNTARIANISM REQUIRES RECIPROCAL INSURANCE: LOVE.

    —“There is a lot of brotherly love and care for each other over here. That’s a very noble thing in a world of radical individualism.”– Noah J Revoy

    We talk about rule of law, but that’s our defense against the dysgenic, parasitic, envious, leftist evil. We mention sovereignty, which is the objective. We rarely mention reciprocal insurance of that sovereignty of all men by all other men. And we never mention that reciprocal insurance creates a brotherhood of men – which is the civil society we all desire.

  • Sovereigntarianism

    Sovereigntarianism https://t.co/dFBo5Ahd5U

  • Sovereigntarianism

    Sovereigntarianism https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/02/sovereigntarianism-2/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 00:23:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267612853516763137

  • Sovereigntarianism

    SOVEREIGNTARIANISM Capitalism creates an economic market producing a war of all against all. Socialism creates a political market producing a war of all against all. Rule of law by Reciprocity, Reciprocal insurance of Sovereignty, and paying the high cost of Heroism and Excellence, Truth and Duty, and Paternalism and Charity, create the optimum polity without the extremes of capitalism or socialism at the cost of total suppression of the irreciprocal and false, under that rule of law by reciprocity and reciprocal insurance. Reciprocal insurance of Sovereignty Rule of Law by Reciprocity Heroism and Excellence (Beauty) Truth and Duty Paternalism and Charity We create commons, accumulate capital, and its multipliers. The enemy consumes like locusts and creates only temporary economic velocity. These are very expensive commons because they require we trust one another to invest in a commons that will not be consumed – because every man is a father, sheriff, warrior, and if necessary, judge of the commons and will defend it. We must separate and return to speciation, or the consumption of accumulated material, institutional, informational, genetic, and planetary capital will be consumed by the enemy.

  • Useful Idiots for The Enemy: Nap-Addicts

    Useful Idiots for The Enemy: Nap-Addicts https://t.co/HXdwO8SURz

  • Useful Idiots for The Enemy: Nap-Addicts

    Useful Idiots for The Enemy: Nap-Addicts https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/useful-idiots-for-the-enemy-nap-addicts/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:24:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267598006184030210

  • Useful Idiots for The Enemy: Nap-Addicts

    USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS The NAP? Really?

    1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes aggression against what?
      a) define aggression?
      b) against what?
      c) who determines it’s aggression and how?

    2. The litmus test is blackmail. Is blackmail aggression?

    3. What is the minimum scope of property necessary for a polity to survive competition for territory and people? How do you know that?

    4. What is the minimum scope of contributions to the production of commons (defense, common goods and services) sufficient for a polity to survive competition for territory, population, and political control? How do you know that?

    5. Why can’t I proactively defend myself on my terms rather than wait until an opposition individual, group, organization, or state conducts violence, harm, theft, fraud, socialization of losses, free riding, rent seeking, corruption, immigration, conversion, undermining, warfare, conquest?

    Once you realize you’re a useful idiot it will probably make you angry that you were a useful idiot and then you will go thru a period of hating the enemy for baiting you in to useful idiocy, but the fact remains – you are a useful idiot if you bought the NAP instead of rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity where property consists of demonstrated interests. You and your opinion don’t matter. The market determines all of these – not you.

  • Useful Idiots for The Enemy: Nap-Addicts

    USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS The NAP? Really?

    1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes aggression against what?
      a) define aggression?
      b) against what?
      c) who determines it’s aggression and how?

    2. The litmus test is blackmail. Is blackmail aggression?

    3. What is the minimum scope of property necessary for a polity to survive competition for territory and people? How do you know that?

    4. What is the minimum scope of contributions to the production of commons (defense, common goods and services) sufficient for a polity to survive competition for territory, population, and political control? How do you know that?

    5. Why can’t I proactively defend myself on my terms rather than wait until an opposition individual, group, organization, or state conducts violence, harm, theft, fraud, socialization of losses, free riding, rent seeking, corruption, immigration, conversion, undermining, warfare, conquest?

    Once you realize you’re a useful idiot it will probably make you angry that you were a useful idiot and then you will go thru a period of hating the enemy for baiting you in to useful idiocy, but the fact remains – you are a useful idiot if you bought the NAP instead of rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity where property consists of demonstrated interests. You and your opinion don’t matter. The market determines all of these – not you.

  • Propertarianism Is a System of Thought Just Like Aristotelianism

    Propertarianism Is a System of Thought Just Like Aristotelianism https://t.co/KR71092Blf