Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • I’m not sure why this is so difficult for you. Let’s try again. My work consists

    I’m not sure why this is so difficult for you.

    Let’s try again. My work consists of (a) an explanation of the Grammars, (b) the operational grammar (c) reciprocity and (d) testimony within it (e) strict construction of arguments with it. (f) strict construction of law from it.

    Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3

  • It doesn’t provide a means of determining what is not aggressable, and it tolera

    It doesn’t provide a means of determining what is not aggressable, and it tolerates blackmail for example (see my debate with walter block)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-28 02:59:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287945644599054336

    Reply addressees: @joanlarma @JadeBai85455803 @billtalts @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287943094999166976

  • It doesn’t provide a means of determining what is not aggressable, and it tolera

    It doesn’t provide a means of determining what is not aggressable, and it tolerates blackmail for example (see my debate with walter block)

    Reply addressees: @joanlarma @JadeBai85455803 @billtalts @JulieBorowski

  • Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and u

    Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and unavoidably in the fabric of the universe. Do you deny physical and evolutionary laws, and do you grant reciprocity to the enemy, and do you practice a variation of the enemy’s cult and logic?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 21:49:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287867740322017280

    Reply addressees: @Keksistance @oscara7oscargeh

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287861019008741382

  • Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and u

    Really? The Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws are written indelibly and unavoidably in the fabric of the universe. Do you deny physical and evolutionary laws, and do you grant reciprocity to the enemy, and do you practice a variation of the enemy’s cult and logic?

    Reply addressees: @Keksistance @oscara7oscargeh

  • photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_lTr6tULrvg/109741711_339272857470874_47864309782

    photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_lTr6tULrvg/109741711_339272857470874_47864309782

    photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_lTr6tULrvg/109741711_339272857470874_478643097822134118_n_339272854137541.jpg John mark did in no way repudiate propertarianism- just the opposite. He said so in his final post on Patreon that’s still up.

    Instead we both repudiated the dissident right as hopeless chimps – and that our 18 month effort to make those subhuman animals into a political movement couldn’t succeed. Just like every other attempt failed by everyone else.

    No matter what we do, what our goals what our solutions or what our tactics if the chimps don’t get schoolyard brawls to watch vicariously from behind the safety of your basement keyboards they’ll just do all they know how to do – and that’s fling ape feces at everyone who tries.

    So we gave up on them. Too dumb. And so we shift back to policy, patriots, normiecons, 2A, militia, and take advantage of the fact that chimps’ve given us media legitimacy by hating us. Which is the only strategic value they (cowards) can provide. 😉

    And yes I really enjoy disrespecting the mouth breathers. I’d rather pander to the enemy and insult them while appealing to men who shut up, and show up for a war we can win on our terms while the morons hand victory to the enemy playing constantly into their hands, traps, and baiting.

    Which we obviously didn’t. And they were too stupid to get it. 😉

    And yes, John mark videos are on the Propertarian institute channel on YouTube.

    (Secret: John is to P Institute as Pam the CBS Executive was to Craig Ferguson’s Late Night. Marketers are easily hired. But in our case monetization has to pay fir them. At 100k, we only hit 1/2 the necessary market to do that. And the institute can’t get in a position where we are dependent on donors capable of funding that kind of production quality. So when you find out your marketing strategy is largely pulling in the attention of enemies, and only 1% quality people, then it’s a simple business decision: Shift to more substantive content, patriots, 2A, and adults who will spread our policy advice, and distance ourselves from the illiterate sh-t flinging white chimps.

    I feel a lot more relaxed now that we’ve done that. I started an intellectual movement. It’s worked and it’s working. But it will work better when counter signaling the dissident right chimps, addressing adults, and feeding the militias and activists content.

    Right wing Chimps are … tiring.John mark did in no way repudiate propertarianism- just the opposite. He said so in his final post on Patreon that’s still up.

    Instead we both repudiated the dissident right as hopeless chimps – and that our 18 month effort to make those subhuman animals into a political movement couldn’t succeed. Just like every other attempt failed by everyone else.

    No matter what we do, what our goals what our solutions or what our tactics if the chimps don’t get schoolyard brawls to watch vicariously from behind the safety of your basement keyboards they’ll just do all they know how to do – and that’s fling ape feces at everyone who tries.

    So we gave up on them. Too dumb. And so we shift back to policy, patriots, normiecons, 2A, militia, and take advantage of the fact that chimps’ve given us media legitimacy by hating us. Which is the only strategic value they (cowards) can provide. 😉

    And yes I really enjoy disrespecting the mouth breathers. I’d rather pander to the enemy and insult them while appealing to men who shut up, and show up for a war we can win on our terms while the morons hand victory to the enemy playing constantly into their hands, traps, and baiting.

    Which we obviously didn’t. And they were too stupid to get it. 😉

    And yes, John mark videos are on the Propertarian institute channel on YouTube.

    (Secret: John is to P Institute as Pam the CBS Executive was to Craig Ferguson’s Late Night. Marketers are easily hired. But in our case monetization has to pay fir them. At 100k, we only hit 1/2 the necessary market to do that. And the institute can’t get in a position where we are dependent on donors capable of funding that kind of production quality. So when you find out your marketing strategy is largely pulling in the attention of enemies, and only 1% quality people, then it’s a simple business decision: Shift to more substantive content, patriots, 2A, and adults who will spread our policy advice, and distance ourselves from the illiterate sh-t flinging white chimps.

    I feel a lot more relaxed now that we’ve done that. I started an intellectual movement. It’s worked and it’s working. But it will work better when counter signaling the dissident right chimps, addressing adults, and feeding the militias and activists content.

    Right wing Chimps are … tiring.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 14:06:00 UTC

  • “Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestio

    “Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-27 13:29:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287741891761573888

    Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287567292197371905

  • “Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestio

    “Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.

    Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski

  • Quote

    —“Not every individual can practice Reciprocity in display word and deed. Every group can practice Rule of Law by Natural Law by getting rid of the members that can’t.”—Martin Štěpán

  • Quote

    —“Not every individual can practice Reciprocity in display word and deed. Every group can practice Rule of Law by Natural Law by getting rid of the members that can’t.”—Martin Štěpán