Smart positioning. NPP vs NAP
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:26:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411436127811158025
Reply addressees: @WesternRenaiss2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411432578867859456
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
Are you sure this is true? Your ethics only prohibit impositions of cost upon in
Are you sure this is true? Your ethics only prohibit impositions of cost upon intersubjectively verifiable property, and that leaves open blackmail and every other kind of soft, hard, and conspiratorial fraud. Are you saying Non Aggression against IVP is superior to Reciprocity?
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:56:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411428606417543175
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411421981514375169
-
I’m happy to debate the non aggression principle as a sophistry and deceit by wh
I’m happy to debate the non aggression principle as a sophistry and deceit by which L’s attempt to leave open the opportunity for parasitism and predation (ghetto ethics), and anarchism by which L’s attempt to evade the cost of producing the institution of property. Sure.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:42:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411425261191585797
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411421750580101121
-
I disagree that it’s moral, or possible, and instead, I claim it’s immoral and i
I disagree that it’s moral, or possible, and instead, I claim it’s immoral and impossible, and that it’s just a fraud (crime) to escape the costs of producing self determination, sovereignty and reciprocity necessary for the institution of property to exist.
Falsify that.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:39:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411424299223822339
Reply addressees: @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411421547290677248
-
of freedom from physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws? (Meaning: Scarcity,
… of freedom from physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws? (Meaning: Scarcity, amorality, self-interest, reciprocity, proportionality, mutation, genetic load, the necessity of natural selection, and necessity of defeating the red queen?) https://t.co/f8EJZwXhA1
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414326234292229
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414322169929728
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
13. Isn’t rothbardianism a false promise of freedom from the physical laws of the universe: the logical, the physical, the behavioral, and the evolutionary? So isn’t rothbardianism simply an evolution of marxism, which is a false promise (Fraud) … https://t.co/PNSjOg6QsI
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414322169929728
-
11. Does argumentation ethics presuppose anything other than a preexisting inter
11. Does argumentation ethics presuppose anything other than a preexisting interest in avoiding violence? (Genghis Khan, nor I,care about your definition of property, ‘rights’ or justice). In other words, why does Hoppe evade the first question of why not kill, rape, conquer?
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414317740793869
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414316130131969
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
10. And, doesn’t every group develop a group evolutionary strategy, a mythology embodying it, ‘logic’ (method) of arguing for and defending it, and a set of norms traditions valuse an institutions using that strategy, mythology, and method? https://t.co/qMujmA5iYj
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414316130131969
-
8. Isn’t evasion by use of non-aggression principles despite human retaliation a
8. Isn’t evasion by use of non-aggression principles despite human retaliation against ALL imposition of costs upon all demonstrated interests whether private, semi-private, or common, an attempt to permit the continuation of fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by loading, …
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414306772684805
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414304889487360
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
7. Are all non-aggression principles means of evading the definition of that which one must be prohibited from aggressing upon?
… https://t.co/aDrzJ6Ii3fOriginal post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414304889487360
-
7. Are all non-aggression principles means of evading the definition of that whi
7. Are all non-aggression principles means of evading the definition of that which one must be prohibited from aggressing upon?
… https://t.co/aDrzJ6Ii3f
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414304889487360
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414300237914117
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. Why does rothbard limit definitions of property that may not be aggressed upon to intersubjectively verifiable property, rather than all demonstrated interests that all humans retaliate against?
… https://t.co/9bUop1sN48Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414300237914117
-
6. Why does rothbard limit definitions of property that may not be aggressed upo
6. Why does rothbard limit definitions of property that may not be aggressed upon to intersubjectively verifiable property, rather than all demonstrated interests that all humans retaliate against?
… https://t.co/9bUop1sN48
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414300237914117
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414296395931650
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5. How are any ‘rights’ brought into existence by human action? Don’t libertarian rights mean demands? In other words, requests for rights without anything to trade in order to obtain such low trust rights? “A Pretense of Intrinsic Value” as exists in female reproduction?
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414296395931650
-
5. How are any ‘rights’ brought into existence by human action? Don’t libertaria
5. How are any ‘rights’ brought into existence by human action? Don’t libertarian rights mean demands? In other words, requests for rights without anything to trade in order to obtain such low trust rights? “A Pretense of Intrinsic Value” as exists in female reproduction?
…
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414296395931650
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414295078969345
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4. How how can order be created such that the institution of property exists rather than mere possession and defense. And given human incentives – man is amoral, isn’t libertarian amorality an expression of man’s amorality? State:Organization of Self Determination by a group.
…Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414295078969345