2022.01.29 Teaching P Law Pt 7 – Incremental Suppression
https://youtu.be/CF_F1TCZwVo
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 19:58:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487515490419359747
Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity
-
2022.01.29 Teaching P Law Pt 7 – Incremental Suppression
-
To some degree, this ‘love of man’ is my ‘religion’. It requires one to have fai
To some degree, this ‘love of man’ is my ‘religion’. It requires one to have faith in man. And that the law of nature and nature’s god is: ‘Evolve through individual sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, truth-before face, duty to commons before self and family.’
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 18:32:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487131608272547841
Reply addressees: @elbanna101
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487130905525334020
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@elbanna101 So IMO it is easy to love all mankind if you can equally trust all to equally share the risk of producing complex networks of cooperation in which none of us siezes an opportunity for gain at others expense – thus decreasing prices, increasing wealth, and increasing commons.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1487130905525334020
-
So IMO it is easy to love all mankind if you can equally trust all to equally sh
So IMO it is easy to love all mankind if you can equally trust all to equally share the risk of producing complex networks of cooperation in which none of us siezes an opportunity for gain at others expense – thus decreasing prices, increasing wealth, and increasing commons.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 18:30:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487130905525334020
Reply addressees: @elbanna101
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487130079775932426
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@elbanna101 … and lastly (e) the result of the applied science, of the rule of empirical law of tort, produces the greatest trust, and the greatest trust and surplus produces greatest possibility of producing commons, and commons reduce costs of living for the poor and the middle.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1487130079775932426
-
2) There are only three means of human coercion (seduction, exchange, force) ->
2) There are only three means of human coercion (seduction, exchange, force) -> three sets of institutions (religion, contract law, state) -> the sequence of institutions determines the hierarchy of influence.
…
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 02:20:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486886775104716808
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486886773846384640
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Yes.
1) ME did not develop trifunctionalism because despite the center of world trade, the supply of a sequence of ‘hill people, desert people, then steppe people’ caused rotation of conqueres of concentrated capital production along the rivers preventing trust formation.
… https://twitter.com/elbanna101/status/1486818087210995717Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1486886773846384640
-
RT @jamesfranko84: This is love of liberty from external extortion, and free wil
RT @jamesfranko84: This is love of liberty from external extortion, and free will within reciprocity. Some say the completion of the scient…
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 02:02:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486882339179438088
-
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @ContraFabianist @curtdoolittle The amazing thing about natur
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @ContraFabianist @curtdoolittle The amazing thing about natural law is as you remove dysfunction it comes naturally to m…
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:16:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486795339751436291
-
WE CANNOT ASSUME IT’S POSSIBLE TO TEACH SCIENTIFIC LAW — “We cannot assume that
WE CANNOT ASSUME IT’S POSSIBLE TO TEACH SCIENTIFIC LAW
— “We cannot assume that the understanding of P, and its teachability will percolate downwards, but that need not be the case for the benefits of the reforms to be detected and pursued across the distribution. It appears that in each case the discovery of the utility of P was made by upper outliers, and primarily teachable to those outliers. But the benefits it produces a means to secure are not constrained to those outliers.” – contrafabian @ContraFabian
Agreed. Science -> Law -> Constittuion -> Policies -> “The Cure”
The people only need to understand the policies and the cure. Some of them may need to understand ‘it’s just the science, and that’s all’. But some of them can’t even undrestand that. So our job is to sell the policy and the science only when necessary or possible.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:16:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696264712675155
-
@Bakalite @Teamsaveamerica Part of moral action is doing the right thing despite
Part of moral action is doing the right thing despite the fact that it’s nearly impossible that anyone else will do the right thing as well. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:50:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696164099429054
-
(Natural Law is just the unification of the sciences into an operational logic o
(Natural Law is just the unification of the sciences into an operational logic of construction and falsification from first principles, and as such the test of rectifiability (truth) under the unification of the sciences. IOW: We prosecute false claims.)
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:48:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486788238371135489
Reply addressees: @mongotooz @xMOLONLABEx @tedcruz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486780960238718983
-
Producing Lawyers and Jurists of the Natural Law (what we do really) is difficul
Producing Lawyers and Jurists of the Natural Law (what we do really) is difficult because the pool of people that we can draw from is limited by minimum IQ and trait Agreeableness and maximum trait Systematizing, resulting in truth before face or comfort, w/ political interest.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:01:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486776386274705408