Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Book_of_Rules Rule of law of natural law, not positive law.

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Book_of_Rules Rule of law of natural law, not positive law. The problem is 20th century positive law. And that posibive…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 23:02:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660783191551090690

  • Rule of law of natural law, not positive law. The problem is 20th century positi

    Rule of law of natural law, not positive law. The problem is 20th century positive law. And that posibive law was created by Rez, Kelsen, and Dworkin, all of whom were (are) jewish. Before them napoleonic law destroyed the common law of the continent. The postwar British restored parlimentary sovereignty not the sovereignty of the natural law. Only America has the remains of natural law – our constitution. And thankfully the supreme court is trying to restore it.

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 20:12:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660740491506339847

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660734703895302144

  • Not sure how that makes any sense. The kings were limited by traditional law – v

    Not sure how that makes any sense.
    The kings were limited by traditional law – very close to natural law. A traditional law that’s 5k years old.
    The divine right of kings was an attempt to overthrow that natural law, and create totalitarianism.
    Instead under the natural law the king as the right to act outside the law to restore the law.
    That’s what we discovered was necessary.
    And that’s how we discovered we need kings.

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 20:11:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660740083652198401

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660736306274619422

  • JUDAISM PILPUL LAW vs EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC LAW Judaism adopted rule of law in res

    JUDAISM PILPUL LAW vs EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC LAW

    Judaism adopted rule of law in response to greek and roman rule of law. Look it up.

    Jewish law like females seeks agreement, not truth. Like females is asymmetric rather than male symmetric.

    Europeans are the only civilization whose first institution, whose founding institution, is natural law (voluntary contract).

    There are only three means of human coercion.
    And; Only three elites of coercion.
    And; Only only three institutions of coercion.
    And; Every civilization started with a founding institution.
    Where; That founding institution is strongest, the second is weaker, and the third is weakest or a failure.

    THREE COERCIONS
    + Martial: Force-Defense
    = Commercial: Trade-Boycott
    – Social: Inclusion-Exclusion

    THREE INSTITUTIONS
    Martial: Defense-Force State
    Commercial: Reciprocal Trade-Boycott Law
    Social: Inclusionary-Exclusionary Religion

    FIRST (ANCHOR) INSTITUTIONS
    China: State > Philosophy > Failed Law
    India: Mythological Religion > State > Failed law
    MENA: Authoritarian Religion > Religious law > Failed States
    Europe: Strong Law > Weak State > Philosophy.

    SPEED OF INNOVATION ADAPTATION EVOLUTION
    1. Law
    … 2. State
    … … 3. Religion

    Hence Jewish Female, and European Male Cognitive Elites compared to the rest of the world.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 19:08:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660724316650995712

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660720745054347270

  • THE SCIENCE OF MARRIAGE Converted from moral and traditional to operational and

    THE SCIENCE OF MARRIAGE

    Converted from moral and traditional to operational and legal terms, Marriage consists a voluntary contract for the formation of a corporation, for the purpose reciprocal insurance, care, exclusivity of sex, and reproduction, including commonality of… https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1660471302124101632


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 04:42:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660506325414019073

  • COVID: YES, JUSTICE GORSUCH IS RIGHT. During the entire fiasco, I never claimed

    COVID: YES, JUSTICE GORSUCH IS RIGHT.

    During the entire fiasco, I never claimed to know anything other than what the initial genome data said, what the illness and fatality demographic data said, just how much non-science was masqurading as science in pursuit of grant money and… https://twitter.com/AP/status/1659703119855464451


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-20 14:47:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659933871901745153

  • RT @AP: Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch called emergency measures taken durin

    RT @AP: Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch called emergency measures taken during the COVID-19 crisis that killed more than 1 million Ameri…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-19 23:31:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659703343458164736

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: DISPROPORTIONALITY IS CRIMINAL The Law is reciprocity with-in

    RT @ThruTheHayes: DISPROPORTIONALITY IS CRIMINAL

    The Law is reciprocity with-in the bounds of proportionality with-in the limits of infall…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-18 00:29:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658993065254699008

  • Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY,

    Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY, AND NATURALITY? (“to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature”) #law

    1. Commonality: the requirement that the legitimacy of law (findings of the court) is determined by empirical evidence of commonality of judgments across regions.

    2. Concurrency: the requirement for empirical evidence that all legislation be agreed upon by the concurrency of regions, classes, (and now sexes).

    3. Therefore: Commonality and Concurrency limit legislation (contracts of the commons), and law (findings of the court), to that which people have already agreed upon.

    4. Therefore the prohibition on authority, whether by the tyranny of a minority or a majority: the people must be persuaded by a concurrence of regions and classes in legislative contracts and commonality of judgments across regions and classes, such that the legislature that represents them is acting on the will of the people despite their differences.

    5. Settled Law: The legislature and the courts are required to produce ‘settled law’ by the tests of commonality and concurrency, thereby prohibiting authority.

    6. Natural Law (Empirical Science of Settled Law): Natural Law is identified by the evidence of dispute resolutions over time – in the case of Europe, over the course of the five thousand years of our history and traditions back to the discovery of contractual civilization on the pontic steppe. Natural law, or what we call ‘tort’ consists of the universal (militia) reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (you’ve paid for one way or another), limiting us to reciprocity in display word and deed, and voluntary markets for cooperation, and the courts in matters of non cooperation: the resolution of disputes.

    7. Natural Rights (Empirical Science of Rights, Obligations and Inalienations): Natural rights, obligations, and inalienations are those discovered and enumerated that are necessary for the preservation of soverignty and reciprocity in display word and deed. As such we have achieved commonality and concurrency over time, independent of the present moment: as such the criminal never voluntarily abandons his crimes without the threat of force. And as such, the court need no approval for the prosecution of violations of natural rights already determined over centuries by commonality. Men and women constantly invent new crimes over time that attempt to violate the natural law and natural rights.

    8. Transactional Law: Legislation, Regulation, and Law are measures of the concurrency and commonality of the people in a time, place, and context, creating an accounting ledge of rules the people have consented to. … … (a) words are weights and measures of time and place
    … (b) people use terms in the context of time and place.
    … (c) people use terms to express meaning with the available weights and measures provided by those terms.
    … (d) as such the interpretation of a term (meaning) is dependent upon both the context of time and place and the context constructed by the person using it within that context of time and place.
    … (e) therefore words have no meaning independent of the context of time, place, author, and his intent.
    … (f) And laws are interpreted in these contexts.
    … (g) Why? To prevent deception of the court and jury on the one hand and to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature on the other.

    9. Western civilization is just science combined with heroism: the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. No other civilization is scientific. The rest are either philosophical(China) or theological(MENA), mythical(India), or magical(Africa).

    Why isn’t this taught in gradeschool to every single person is obvious: there are those seditious and treasonous among us who seek to impose their authority by circumvention of the demand for commonality and concurrency.

    We call them ‘leftists’. Because all leftism is crime, sedition, and treason against our civilization. That’s what defines leftism: inventions in criminality that have not yet been outlawed by court or legislature.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-16 18:55:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658546773256724499

  • Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY,

    Q: CURT: WHY IS THE COURT RESTORING THE COMMON LAW OF CONCURRENCY, COMMONALITY, AND NATURALITY?
    (“to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature”) #law

    Commonality: the requirement that the legitimacy of law (findings of the court) is determined by empirical evidence of commonality of judgments across regions.
    Concurrency: the requirement for empirical evidence that all legislation be agreed upon by the concurrency of regions, classes, (and now sexes).
    Therefore: Commonality and Concurrency limit legislation (contracts of the commons), and law (findings of the court), to that which people have already agreed upon.
    Therefore the prohibition on authority, whether by the tyranny of a minority or a majority: the people must be persuaded by a concurrence of regions and classes in legislative contracts and commonality of judgments across regions and classes, such that the legislature that represents them is acting on the will of the people despite their differences.
    Settled Law: The legislature and the courts are required to produce ‘settled law’ by the tests of commonality and concurrency, thereby prohibiting authority.
    Natural Law (Empirical Science of Settled Law): Natural Law is identified by the evidence of dispute resolutions over time – in the case of Europe, over the course of the five thousand years of our history and traditions back to the discovery of contractual civilization on the pontic steppe. Natural law, or what we call ‘tort’ consists of the universal (militia) reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (you’ve paid for one way or another), limiting us to reciprocity in display word and deed, and voluntary markets for cooperation, and the courts in matters of non cooperation: the resolution of disputes.
    Natural Rights (Empirical Science of Rights, Obligations and Inalienations): Natural rights, obligations, and inalienations are those discovered and enumerated that are necessary for the preservation of soverignty and reciprocity in display word and deed. As such we have achieved commonality and concurrency over time, independent of the present moment: as such the criminal never voluntarily abandons his crimes without the threat of force. And as such, the court need no approval for the prosecution of violations of natural rights already determined over centuries by commonality. Men and women constantly invent new crimes over time that attempt to violate the natural law and natural rights.
    Transactional Law: Legislation, Regulation, and Law are measures of the concurrency and commonality of the people in a time, place, and context, creating an accounting ledge of rules the people have consented to.
    (a) words are weights and measures of time and place (b) people use terms in the context of time and place. (c) people use terms to express meaning with the available weights and measures provided by those terms.
    (d) as such the interpretation of a term (meaning) is dependent upon both the context of time and place and the context constructed by the person using it within that context of time and place.
    (e) therefore words have no meaning independent of the context of time, place, author, and his intent.
    (f) And laws are interpreted in these contexts.
    (g) Why? To prevent deception of the court and jury on the one hand and to prevent circumvention of the legislature and the people via the legislature on the other.

    Western civilization is just science combined with heroism: the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. No other civilization is scientific. The rest are either philosophical(China) or theological(MENA), mythical(India), or magical(Africa).

    Why isn’t this taught in gradeschool to every single person is obvious: there are those seditious and treasonous among us who seek to impose their authority by circumvention of the demand for commonality and concurrency.

    We call them ‘leftists’. Because all leftism is crime, sedition, and treason against our civilization. That’s what defines leftism: inventions in criminality that have not yet been outlawed by court or legislature.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-16 14:00:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658472499158585344