RT @lhpanthermom: @JRobFromMN @tracybeanz …Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the gover…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-07 17:22:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677367385810952214
RT @lhpanthermom: @JRobFromMN @tracybeanz …Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the gover…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-07 17:22:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677367385810952214
Absolutely.
Though in the west religious uniform (dress) is a claim that you have greater loyalty to something else than the polity and the law. This is suitable for empires but not for nations.
This behavior will not disappear in the west.
I fully expect that we will restore the prohibition of religious dress specifically for that reason. And Subtle jewelry will be the only tolerable dress signal of personal fealty to a religion.
Because there are no ‘world religions’ any longer – that false promise was a hypothesis of the enlightenment that has failed like the others.
Religion is inseparable from gene pool and civilization. They are means of intergenerational transfer of groups strategy. In this sense they are rebellions against the polity.
Given that the west’s political system is the scientific, empirical, natural law of cooperation, and religious traditions are protected for the purpose of our children, the weak, and the old, there is no room for ‘hostiles’.
There is presently room because of the Jewish leftist program of degeneracy. But this will end over the next two decades as well.
Reply addressees: @DerekofMercia @WerrellBradley @Good_Old_Blakey @right_side1
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-07 16:55:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677360614933504013
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677356357391904768
No the scotus is returning control to the states in order to prevent another civil war. The government has lost almost all legitimacy the court still has some, and even the military is losing legitimacy. The only solution is devolution of the federal government over social…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-04 23:22:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676370849920696320
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674490391171837954
I prefer not to debate any ideology because it will always result in me call them ignorant, stupid or childish. 🙁 Instead I’d prefer to discuss legal strategies and if necessary revolutionary strategies.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-04 20:05:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676321296043368448
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676320330959278083
RT @LPNational: “Hate speech” is just the new branding on a very old idea.
All government efforts to curtail or hinder your speech are unc…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-01 22:58:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675277773802205185
You are just looking at the prism from a different direction setting a different priority to fulfill your agenda, because you understand one view of the prism. My job is law: decidability.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-01 19:17:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675222007166689282
Reply addressees: @CrispinFitheler @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675212134886838272
Yes, it refers to houses for the classes such as:
State: Monarchy (President, Prime Minister)
Regions: Nobility (Senate)
Business: Burghers (Upper House)
Workers,: Church (Middle House)
Women, Dependents: Church (Lower House)
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-01 19:14:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675221473743568896
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @CrispinFitheler @FarajRashi93307
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675214870604845056
Nope. Covenants are just constrained enough that if you behave badly neighbors can sue you. So between housing prices and covenants behavior can be stricly regulated. But not dependent on race or religion.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-01 01:26:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674952680559525888
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674942014977105922
Denying housing based on race is illegal, enforced, highly frowned upon.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-01 00:41:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674941365459865606
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @Nefertiiti
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674937359798882304
I’m not sure I understand your question in the context. I suspect you’re trying to make some kind of moral equivalency when I only make economic and legal judgments.
If they’re sterile they don’t reproduce.
Unfortunately, they are probably, the woman almost certainly, a dead weight on society. But they’re doing no harm if … they do no harm. We insure one another against acts of nature (sterility). We do not insure one another against acts of self interest that impose a cost on the commons, and especially when it impacts children, and especially when that impact can render them a dead weight sunk cost, with zero reproductive potential.
Reply addressees: @DA2PIQ @ZCQXCV @DonKnowles3 @JessVonMiqobutt @JessicaInsanity @RyanShead
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 21:40:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674895632664784896
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674874849649627144