Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • English version (a) the law is a largely unpleasant occupation and there are 300

    English version
    (a) the law is a largely unpleasant occupation and there are 300 people in America for every lawyer, which is why it’s becoming a middle-class income occupation. And many of these people are not very good at their jobs.
    (b) Law schools still teach philosophy, not science, and worse they almost never teach the difference between natural and positive law as science vs justification for the centralization of authority over people without their consent. They certainly don’t teach natural law, commonality, and concurrency as an empirical science of cooperation – or that the constitution, declaration, bill of rights, federalist papersm and Blackstone’s Commentaries are as close to the scientific method of government every established by man.
    (c) Case law in the common law is fine but without the natural, common, concurrent science of decidability then they are fabricating legitimacy that has led to our current crisis. Likewise the bill of rights is incomplete, and was stated as such, but this has been used to supplant the natural and common law history and it’s empirical basis.
    (d) So law schools have been teaching seditious activism since the mid-sixties and now all the law schools (except some of Chicago) are captured by those teaching revolutionaries to undermine that science, and the constitution that was constructed from it, and the miracles that have been produced by the English invention of the modern rule of law state, codified in the american constitution – albiet with six or eight holes in it that the truck of deceit drove through with ease.

    Reply addressees: @SarkyRecaps @scrumble_eggs @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 19:32:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699143506302828544

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699126889057587694

  • You should try writing a constitution. It’s horrific work

    You should try writing a constitution.
    It’s horrific work.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 18:01:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699120623421632700

    Reply addressees: @EddyRobinson @scrumble_eggs @bortisbased @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699118790834069676

  • (worth repeating) The court is in a period of reversing legal activism (lawfare)

    (worth repeating)
    The court is in a period of reversing legal activism (lawfare) in an effort to restore the legislative process and legitimacy of legislature and court, and this includes restoring the common law prohibition on conspiracy to interfere with marriage, employment,…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 17:30:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699112899761877224

  • WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? Let me help you: The Declaration, Constitution, Bill of Rig

    WHAT IS NATURAL LAW?
    Let me help you: The Declaration, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Federalist Papers, and the legal doctrine of the age, Blackstone’s Commentary, are all statements of natural law. As was Acquinas’ synthesis, Aristotle’s ambition, and the founding of western civilization on the steppe as voluntary contractualism between cattle raiders who united horse, bronze, and wheel.

    What is natural law? The science of cooperation: The universal empirical evidence that cooperation requires self-determination by self-determined means, by tests of Sovereignty in demonstrated interests, Reciprocity in display word and deed, Duty(rights, obligations, inalienations) of insurance of that self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity, including truth, excellence, and beauty, limiting us to markets for voluntary cooperation in the private sector, in the public sector, and the resolution of disputes, by these requirements, before a jury of our peers. The outcome being the most rapid innovation, adaptation and evolution of all civilizations invented by man.

    Of course, we distill this down to tests of ‘tort’. (Trespass). Which is, as always, the foundation of the natural, common, concurrent law. Meaning: Natural (empirical science), by evidence of the results of adversarial competition achieving common(consensus across classes and regions in the negative) and concurrent (consensus across classes and regions in the positive), rules (laws), by the prohibition on authority. In other words, the west invented science by the invention of its law as the first science.

    Oh ye poor ignorant peasants indoctrinated into postwar pseudoscience and sophistry and ignorant of that which made your luxury of ignorance possible.

    All preachers of the truth must suffer the slings and arrows of ignorance of the peasantry before he can save them from themselves. 😉

    Duty calls. 😉

    Reply addressees: @SteveTownsend0 @crhealy72 @scrumble_eggs @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 17:12:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699108224102752256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699095843259789380

  • No, Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to prevent people from interfering with freedom of

    No, Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to prevent people from interfering with freedom of speech. Filing a lawsuit for conspiracy to destroy the value of a business by coercion of (threat to) its customers, in order to impose limits on freedom of speech is a rather simple argument. You do not realize that you are projecting your morals as law where such a law does not exist.

    Maybe you should leave grownup conversation to grownups.

    Here is the dummy version:
    –“Hate speech in the United States cannot be directly regulated by the government due to the fundamental right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution. While “hate speech” is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected speech under the First Amendment. In a Supreme Court case on the issue, Matal v. Tam (2017), the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no “hate speech” exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment and that the U.S. government may not discriminate against speech on the basis of the speaker’s viewpoint.”–

    Reply addressees: @LexerD1986 @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 04:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698914642095976448

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698913062319772074

  • Positive law,, and the entire positive law movement, by Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin, Ha

    Positive law,, and the entire positive law movement, by Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin, Hartt, like physics, psychology, sociology, and polotical theory, is yet another admission of failure. Not only did the Church fail to transition to modernity and double down, but Legal theory failed to transition to modernity, just as the marxist sequence failed to transition to modernity, and just as economics became lost in mathiness and failed to transitin to modernity.
    The reasons for this transitino are complex and we can blame many fields for their influence.
    But the fundamental problem is the failure of law as a social economic and political science to understand itself

    We have solved this problem.
    And the profundity of our solution is even more profound than the darwinian revolution.
    Yet, unlike the darwinian revolution, it isn’t communicable by a single simple idea that will readily anchor the reader ,listener, or audience any more than the behavior of electron orbitals will assist in understanding of sentience.
    So we have a harder job than darwin.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 14:55:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698349068378918912

  • RT @Outsideness: “So: Proud Boys, milling around in the Capitol grounds: 15- and

    RT @Outsideness: “So: Proud Boys, milling around in the Capitol grounds: 15- and 17-year sentences. Black Lives Matter, trashing and burnin…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-02 22:56:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698107650955767928

  • Pretty much. (well done) IMO requires courts, nobility, and monarchy to compensa

    Pretty much. (well done)
    IMO requires courts, nobility, and monarchy
    to compensate for professional bureaucracy.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-02 17:56:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698032136752594948

    Reply addressees: @Dontcar25448459 @EdwardSpruit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698015179152265601

  • RT @justinamash: End civil asset forfeiture

    RT @justinamash: End civil asset forfeiture.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 07:38:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697514335826858068

  • RT @ContraFabianist: Human rights elevate the individual as the primary unit of

    RT @ContraFabianist: Human rights elevate the individual as the primary unit of moral decidability. By elevating the individual, the human…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-31 07:52:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697155331162567013