Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • THE NECESSITY AND PERPETUITY OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND WHY IT CANNOT AND WILL

    THE NECESSITY AND PERPETUITY OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND WHY IT CANNOT AND WILL NEVER CHANGE
    Just to educate you out of your ignorance. By design and for the good of all we live in a concurrent majority constitution and government, not majority constitution and government. We do not live in a democracy but a republic under concurrency and commonality. And the reason you don’t know this is that you were intentionally indoctrinated so that in your ignorance you would assist in undermining it.

    The Science of The American Constitution:

    1. NATURAL LAW: (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, tort)
    The Institution of the Natural Law
    1. The constitution, bill of rights, declaration, federalist papers, Blackstone’s commentaries, and history of the common law, the common germanic law, and the ancestral european law (west indo european)

    2. COMMONALITY: Across classes and regions in what not to do. Empiricism in discovery of prohibitions.
    The institutions of commonality:
    2. The hierarchy of courts

    3. CONCURRENCY: ACROSS CLASSES AND REGIONS in what we should do, and not a majority independent of classes and regions (tyranny of the majority). Empiricism in the discovery of agreements on the production of commons.
    The Institutions of Concurrency
    3.1. The House(proxy for the people) for concurrency in the population
    3.2. The Senate(proxy for governor) for concurrency in the states.
    3.3. The Electoral College for Concurrency of the states in the selection of the president (proxy for nobility)

    This system was designed to give the people as whole and the governors individually on behalf of the states, and the jury of the electoral college on behalf of that governor and that state, to ensure that there was the maximum competition and maxium commonality across every faction in order to continue the common law tradition that we may impose nothing that is not decided first by commonality or concurrency. In other words, the people, in regions and classes must agree.

    This entire system was designed specifically to PREVENT the horrors you seek to spread in your ignorance and arrogance.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @9898guitar @RadioTodd13


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-26 17:38:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706725028299984896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706678898073939991

  • WHY DO WE HAVE MARRIAGE LICENSES? AND WHAT IS A MARRIAGE FOR THAT MATTER? (Histo

    WHY DO WE HAVE MARRIAGE LICENSES? AND WHAT IS A MARRIAGE FOR THAT MATTER?
    (Historically, for the same reason we have title companies for our homes and automobiles, and insurers to protect those assets. Today to destroy our civilization from within?)

    TERMINOLOGY
    (a) License is just a term that the state can use, but that’s not its purpose. Most of the time, states use the term “Marriage Certificate” which allows third parties to verify the marriage exists and committments by both parties are enforcible.

    HISTORICALLY
    (a) Marriage was a contract between the sexes on one hand, and public marriage a committment by the people and the polity to insure the marriage by **non interference in the marriage**. Essentially a property right of both parties.

    (b) To protect the common good, the church then the government or both enforced the contract between the parties, and between that party and the public. The broadest funciton of the state is ‘insurer of last resort’. Much of what governments do act as an insurer. Regulation is by and large an act of insurance of the people gainst harm.

    (c) The state In it’s role as an insurer against harms by others, and with marriage crimes being common in history, including bigamy, undermining a marriage, and divorce, states had an interest in suppressing marriage crimes. So laws regulating divorce and the distribution of assets (usually children and what you brought into the marriage for the woman, and what he accumulated during marriage for the man (if anything).)

    (d) Given that families were one’s primary economic and survival insurer, and especially the insurer of the offspring, such that single mothers and abandoned children didn not brecome a hazard to local society, historically speaking **marriage was a union between families not just individuals**.

    (e) As such, as populations and mobility increased, notices were published usually in the churches (the “Bans”) to prevent bigamy and to ask the community if there were objections. (We still ask for objections in our traditional wedding vows today.)

    (f) In the USA where religion was inconsistent, and cross-religious marriage common, marriage licenses evolved because the state officials could conduct marriage instead of just the church. So in practice – a marriage license is a **record of a contract** that the state can enforce, and prevention of false claims that attempted to make the state enforce.

    (g) In the USA, the marriage license was expanded from preventing bigamy and limiting divorce crimes, and next used to prohibit interracial marriages, and later, once awareness of blood type incompatibility and its affect on children, and later to assist in shared credit and state benefits.

    THEREFORE
    1. Does the state have a role in enforcement of a contract and in defense of the asset of the marriage?
    … (Yes, certainly).
    2. Does the state have a role in determining how marriage may be used for circumventing law, abridging cultural norms and traditions, or other impositions of costs upon the community given that the family is the first of the formal institutions of any polity?
    … (Probably)
    3. Does the state have a role in determining if other than a man and a woman can engage in marriage? No historical evidence. No necessity. Same can be accomplished by private contract, including exchange of powers of attorney.
    … (Questionably.)
    4. Does the state have a role in ending the prohibition on the interference in a marriage; or enacting no fault divorce, forcing common property, or alimony, or child support?
    … (Absolutely not)

    The Progressive Administrative, Managerial State, in league with the left, and the feminists, have destroyed the institution of marriage, the family as insurer, and the public’s defense of that institution and contract – and with it the first and most necessar instituion of behavioral, social, cultural, economic, and political constructoin.

    Just as the left said it would – and did.
    So, what is the difference between war against life and physical capital without, versus war against behavioral and institutional capital within?

    There isn’t any other than the rate of destruction.
    It’s still war.

    Cheers
    Curt

    Reply addressees: @Xeranx @Eliendssss @return_of_rome @schizarella


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-25 21:45:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706424678523293696

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706304616265117798

  • Well done. Yes. This is one of the solutions we’re recommending. Also, senators

    Well done. Yes. This is one of the solutions we’re recommending.
    Also, senators should be appointed by governors again instead of directly elected. That as a tragic mistake. It separated the federal government from the states, when the entire purpose of the senate was to provide a house for governors of the states, but compensating for the fact that travel was impossible for governors, but possible for house memebers (the people).

    Reply addressees: @Chargerfryar @BasedLawyer


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 22:31:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706073836720926720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1706048966301978719

  • I operate from the premise that competent people can live among us if their mali

    I operate from the premise that competent people can live among us if their malincenties are curbed by law and counter-incenties to prosecute their tendencies to sedition whether feminine, class, or cultural.
    This is my job, conflict prevention.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-24 15:50:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705972934764838979

  • It’s easier for americans to start the reforms, and then push them into europe –

    It’s easier for americans to start the reforms, and then push them into europe – simply because there are so many of us, and more importantly, our constitution only needs minor changes because it’s scientific – unile european constitutions which are fanciful by comparison.
    Though, given the public must become angry, the rate of suffering will escalate in europe faster than the USA. So, given that these reforms require stress to act upon, even if given the rise of the right in europe because of immigration (unwanted), it’s really quite hard to predict where it will happen first.
    I mean, I didn’t forsee the degree of exasperation of the french – who are in the wost position. I”m surprised germany hasn’t had more trouble than we’ve seen.
    France always has been and remains the enemy of europe, and I’m primarily concerned that the poles and the germans take up responsibility for europe.

    Reply addressees: @RemttidAcul


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 18:19:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705648177330716672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705646073753043108

  • THE COMING MASS REVOCATION, DENATURALIZATION, AND REPATRIATION CITIZENSHIP While

    THE COMING MASS REVOCATION, DENATURALIZATION, AND REPATRIATION

    CITIZENSHIP
    While residency and citizenship have historically been two separate terms, for two separate classes. Meaning that residents are subject to via negativa legal defense, but only citizens are privilegd to participate in via positiva legislation and administration.

    Under modern mass democracy we have merged these two terms, granting everyone the franchise whether contributing to it, invested in it, responsible for maintaining it – and even granted it to those unfit for it, hostile to it, and aggressively seeking to undermine it. And worse, we have ended the use of houses of government as a market between the classes, and then worse, we have not created a house of labor or women when those classes have hostile interests to the productive, and territorial leadership classes. We have created a race to the bottom that has destroyed every attempt at democracy in history.

    So at present, Citizenship, meaning, permission to reside in a territory, being insured by the insurer of last resort – the state, contributing taxes and receiving benefits, is and always has been revokable – denaturalization into statelessness, just as defense by the people and the state has been revokable – a designation of outlaw.

    REVOKATION
    Historically, we removed the muslims from spain. We removed the jews repeatedly from most countries. We deported one another en masse during the era of nation state formation. All governments have relocated hostile, problematic, unfit, people around the world throughout history. More recently, the Dominicans revoked citizenship and removed the Hatians. We have departed kingdoms and territories (not countries) we had colonized, after forming them into countries.

    CRISIS
    It is almost absolutely positively certain that this process will repeat as soon as the anglo american unification of the planet during the age of sail, the industrial revolution, and the world wars that ended the age of agrarian empires – attempting to usher in the modern age of nation states, and the rules based interanational order that’s dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty and disease. That order should have ended in 92, instad of celebrating the false victory and claims of end of history. Instead the enemy pulled out all the stops starting with the obama presidency, his invitation of a very selct and biased group of economists to the white house, and by doing nothing at all to prevent the rise of opposition abroad, while encouraging it at home – just as his church of hatred of white civilization had preached. He followed their scripture.

    The age of debt expansion ends with the age of population expansion. The age of hyperconsumption and redistribution ends at the same time. And with it the tolerance for those unfit for western civilization and it’s institutions of ‘whiteness’ – a term which is a hostile slur for our civilization’s institutions and traditions that indoctrinate and require each person bear the maximum possible responsiblity for both private and common – thus forcing all of us to insure everything in the high trust civilization or be deprived of our rights within it.

    PREDICTIONS
    I have an enviable record of prediction, and it’s not as if the movement we began in the early nineties, escalating in the early oughts, is other than expanding rapidly in the public consciousness as our experiment with the pretense of the end of scarcity and equality between sexes classes and peoples continues to hit the wall of the exhaustion of the few economic generations of temporarhy privilege created by industrialization and the anglo american unification of the world in trade – ending the age of agrarian empires and their monopoly on trade and trade routes.

    I have had a very difficult time with prediction over the past few years as acceleration and crisis drowns the data in noise impossible to peer through. I was very far off with China, who, I didn’t believe could survive this long. I was too optimistic about russia and had greater confidence that we would finally unite rusian resources with german technology – mostly so that Russia, demographically, and economically, could simply survive.

    I had expected a narrow Hillary election victory – and an administration fully completing the transformation to political Leninism (Hillary’s a Leninist are are most Democrats today) to cause a revolution that would spiral – and it was the proper timing for it to occur with the least harm – well before we encounter the 2025-2030(5?) coincidence of cycles that will without question create some sort of catastrophic reorganization.

    While Trump was correct on his international and economic policy (as well as immigration) and correctly restructured geostrategy and sought to repatriate and restore the american working and middle classes, (and while he was clearly not expecting to win, or he would have spent a year putting together a team willing to push through policy), he actually took wind out of the sails of the fomenting revolution, and caused the radical left and their allies in the democratic party, credentialist (deep) state, academy, and media, to double down an accelerate with the activist terrorism of BLM and Antifa. But covid gave them the excuse to destroy the economy and end trump’s achievement. Which, as I predicted and tried (at personal harm) to popularize and defend against, they then used to suppress all public political discourse as thorougly as the soviets then and the Chinese now. Again, label it as you want, but in technical terms it’s Leninism.

    So, while it takes a greate deal of general knowledge to predict long term trends and the intersection of cycles, it’s impossible to predict timing – almost entirely because it’s impossible to judge the rate of adaptation of the population to the circumstances at hand to the deterministic outcome that they’re heading into against their wishes or their understanding – and their overwhelming desire to bury heads in the sand instead.

    So since there are so many of us in the business of predicting these cycles now that for those of us with knowledge of the subject, our date ranges are converging.

    And some should take comfort in that we are, at least the anglosphere is, as naval rather than ‘world island’ powers, most insulated from the coming crisis. And in america we will profit from it.

    That said we will ether devolve as I have recommended and worked toward, into a federation that the founders intended, with common rule of law between states, and minimum rights within, yet total local control over social economic and cultural life – or we will war untili more than ten million – maybe many more – are dead. And while that is happening all the pent up wants and fantasies of those less moral than we, will be expressed as wars of aggression and predation upon one another, and the world costs of everything will reach levels that cause starvation to return as certainly and as thorougly as the black plague.

    So you know, I kinda want to fix this problem peacefully before any of that has a chance to happen.

    And we can’t do it until the public needs far less of a lever to motivate them to understand and willingly accept the necessary change” that the usa isn’t and never was a country, but a federation of countries, (states), agreeing to the same terms, so that we could capture this contient for our mutual gain despite our differences in wants and needs and ambitions.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 18:05:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705644507084050432

  • The Coming Asset Forfeiture and Restitution for The Enemy’s Crimes. 1) If one vi

    The Coming Asset Forfeiture and Restitution for The Enemy’s Crimes.
    1) If one violates the principle of the common law, neither legislation, regulation, or code, must exist for the crime to be prosecuted.
    2) Most crimes of the present crisis are violations of the natural, common, concurrent law, even if not prohibited in legislation regulation or code.
    3) Asset Forfeiture does not require intent by the owners of the assets to engage in a crime, only that the assets were used or gained in the process of that crime.
    4) This will be the largest reorganization and redistribution since the Roman Reforms, and will forever prohibit a repetition of these crimes.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 16:34:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705621782831468544

  • The law we produce is like all science that satisfies the test surviving as test

    The law we produce is like all science that satisfies the test surviving as testimony is just true. What we do with the truth is prevent people from lying. So within not lying they can negotiate whatever they want. We do not say what to do, only what you will be punished in one…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-23 00:29:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705378817077108825

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705376626400440747

  • The constitution has survived better than every other government in western civi

    The constitution has survived better than every other government in western civilization. And the current Supreme Court is trying to restore it.
    There are about eight holes in the constitution that if repaired, would mean that it would be far harder to undermine what we consider our morals and group strategy than it has been in this century.
    We’ve (our organization) done the work to plug those holes.
    But we must, like every previous revolution, force those changes in to a government that is suckling our our lifeblood for it’s own self interest and our expense.

    Reply addressees: @PresentWitness_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-22 03:17:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705058650803294208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705001382200414323

  • Yes. Well done. Among our Institute’s reforms is personal liability for legislat

    Yes. Well done.
    Among our Institute’s reforms is personal liability for legislation – at least in so far as it is non false and does not violate the natural law or the constitution, or our rights, obligations, and inalienations, directly or indirectly.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-20 18:07:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704557853262950517

    Reply addressees: @Brian_Barwinski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704543497657729241