Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • EVERY MAN A SHERIFF But to make every man a sheriff, I must give every man a boo

    EVERY MAN A SHERIFF

    But to make every man a sheriff, I must give every man a book of law.

    Do you see?

    🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-01 05:36:00 UTC

  • It’s Either Rights of Association or Slavery

    [F]reedom requires: 1 – Right of Entrance / Exit. 2 – Right of Association / Disassociation. 3 – Right of Trade / Boycott If you cannot exit, determine, association and disassociation, choose whom to trade and whom to boycott, then you are a slave. Period.

  • It’s Either Rights of Association or Slavery

    [F]reedom requires: 1 – Right of Entrance / Exit. 2 – Right of Association / Disassociation. 3 – Right of Trade / Boycott If you cannot exit, determine, association and disassociation, choose whom to trade and whom to boycott, then you are a slave. Period.

  • Laws Prohibit Involuntary Transfer. Contracts Exchange Rights.

    [I]n writing a new constitution, we can easily deprive the government(producers of commons) and the judiciary(adjudication of law) of the ability to make law. The only laws that can possibly exist are those that prohibit a means of free riding (parasitism/imposing costs). And those laws must be found (discovered), theorized. Conversely, all positive rights can only possibly exist as contractual provisions in matters of exchange. The justness of contracts is something that we know how to do, and have done throughout our history.

    Now we can, each of us, either negotiate directly, or grant to some person, or some party, the right to negotiate contracts on our behalf. And to be bound by the contract that they negotiate. But in no case can I make a contract (a negotiation) that is unlawful – imposes involuntary transfers, or externalizes involuntary transfers. Nor can I engage in deceit in such contracts, by means of verbal obscurantism (non-operational language, or in violation of strict construction, or its quantitative equivalent laundering and pooling (money).

  • Laws Prohibit Involuntary Transfer. Contracts Exchange Rights.

    [I]n writing a new constitution, we can easily deprive the government(producers of commons) and the judiciary(adjudication of law) of the ability to make law. The only laws that can possibly exist are those that prohibit a means of free riding (parasitism/imposing costs). And those laws must be found (discovered), theorized. Conversely, all positive rights can only possibly exist as contractual provisions in matters of exchange. The justness of contracts is something that we know how to do, and have done throughout our history.

    Now we can, each of us, either negotiate directly, or grant to some person, or some party, the right to negotiate contracts on our behalf. And to be bound by the contract that they negotiate. But in no case can I make a contract (a negotiation) that is unlawful – imposes involuntary transfers, or externalizes involuntary transfers. Nor can I engage in deceit in such contracts, by means of verbal obscurantism (non-operational language, or in violation of strict construction, or its quantitative equivalent laundering and pooling (money).

  • LAWS PROHIBIT INVOLUNTARY TRANSFER – CONTRACTS EXCHANGE RIGHTS. In writing a new

    LAWS PROHIBIT INVOLUNTARY TRANSFER – CONTRACTS EXCHANGE RIGHTS.

    In writing a new constitution, we can easily deprive the government(producers of commons) and the judiciary(adjudication of law) of the ability to make law. The only laws that can possibly exist are those that prohibit a means of free riding (parasitism/imposing costs). And those laws must be found (discovered), theorized.

    Conversely, all positive rights can only possibly exist as contractual provisions in matters of exchange. The justness of contracts is something that we know how to do, and have done throughout our history.

    Now we can, each of us, either negotiate directly, or grant to some person, or some party, the right to negotiate contracts on our behalf. And to be bound by the contract that they negotiate.

    But in no case can I make a contract (a negotiation) that is unlawful – imposes involuntary transfers, or externalizes involuntary transfers. Nor can I engage in deceit in such contracts, by means of verbal obscurantism (non-operational language, or in violation of strict construction, or its quantitative equivalent laundering and pooling (money).

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-28 07:36:00 UTC

  • The Meaning of “Incremental Suppression”

    (organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).

    11329943_844618748949499_3787539329878715636_n

    [T]he logic of the Incremental Suppression of Free Riding via the evolution of the Common Law.

    1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.

    2) Cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.

    3) Cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.

    4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment) – they protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.

    5) Rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).

    6) Prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.

    7) Prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.

    8) Community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.

    9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)

    10) High trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.

    11) As a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.

    [A]ristocracy, Egalitarianism, Morality, Nomocracy, Meritocracy, Science, and Eugenic Evolution are mutually dependent.

    The diagram shows the incremental suppression of parasitism starting from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.

    Only the west succeeded in developing the norm of truth. And without truth telling we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.

    Truth matters above all else. Pseudoscience is just Babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes. And this new emperor is naked also.

    Truth is enough to rescue the west.  Truth is enough.


  • The Meaning of “Incremental Suppression”

    The Meaning of “Incremental Suppression”

    (organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).

    11329943_844618748949499_3787539329878715636_n

    [T]he logic of the Incremental Suppression of Free Riding via the evolution of the Common Law.

    1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.

    2) Cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.

    3) Cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.

    4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment) – they protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.

    5) Rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).

    6) Prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.

    7) Prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.

    8) Community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.

    9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)

    10) High trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.

    11) As a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.

    [A]ristocracy, Egalitarianism, Morality, Nomocracy, Meritocracy, Science, and Eugenic Evolution are mutually dependent.

    The diagram shows the incremental suppression of parasitism starting from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.

    Only the west succeeded in developing the norm of truth. And without truth telling we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.

    Truth matters above all else. Pseudoscience is just Babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes. And this new emperor is naked also.

    Truth is enough to rescue the west.  Truth is enough.


  • IF IT CAN”T BE EMBODIED IN LAW, IT IS MEANINGLESS. I don’t write continental phi

    IF IT CAN”T BE EMBODIED IN LAW, IT IS MEANINGLESS.

    I don’t write continental philosophy. I write analytic philosophy. And I can state Propertarianism as law. THat’s the problem I have with NRx. It’s good as a language. It’s good at educating. But it doesn’t provide a solution to post-agrarian polities, and it can’t be embodied in law. I still feel that Propertarianism is part of the reactionary movement, even if I don’t really have much to do with Moldbuggery.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-22 08:56:00 UTC

  • GUNS: TIME FOR REFORM, BUT NOT OF GUNS (feminist ideology trigger warning) THE D

    GUNS: TIME FOR REFORM, BUT NOT OF GUNS

    (feminist ideology trigger warning)

    THE DEFINITIVE ANSWER

    It certainly means that people taking brain altering chemicals should be required to put them in storage for the duration. So far, it looks like the primary difference between American ‘shooters’ and others, is that an absurd amount of Americans are taking various brain altering chemicals for various forms of depression. And that they have this depression and are taking those chemicals for the simple reason that American culture produces intolerable loneliness in exchange for extraordinary levels of personal consumption.

    – The Absolute Nuclear Family creates the potential for loneliness.

    – Internal Migration of people to capital rather than capital to people creates loneliness.

    – Normatively diverse schools create conflict in youth.

    – Normative diversity creates conflict in life.

    – Access to political power under capitalism rewards normative diversity, cultural diversity and genetic diversity, and conflict.

    Blame: Socialists, Economists: the prioritization of monetary consumption over familial insurance, and Feminists: the prioritization of feminism over family bonds and insurance.

    Women are the world’s consumers, and they created consumerism because they cannot resist the nesting impulse, any more than an addict can resist his fix. And women prefer permissive motherhood rather than normative constraint motherhood, because it is much more work to raise your child to be a competitive, productive and cooperative member of society than it is to not train your child to be so.

    Labor was a trivial problem. Women were the reason for the decline of western civilization.

    It’s painful. It’s impolitic. But it’s true. Period.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-06-20 06:15:00 UTC