DEAR RUSSIANS: TRUST
The only way to institutionally manufacture widespread trust is an incorruptible independent judiciary, the common organic law, property rights to property-en-toto, public registries of property ownership, universal standing in matters of the commons, and the most severe prosecution of perjury.
The world will trust you only when you can trust yourselves.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-07 03:21:00 UTC
[I] think that anyone with knowledge of the intellectual history of law is keenly aware of the church’s problem of breaking up the large family holdings, and the law’s problem of preventing retaliation.
What I think has proven difficult for most people in the conservative and certainly in the libertarian movements, is the recognition that property rights must extend to cover all those impositions that invoke retaliation.
—-“Frost and Harpending argue that Human nature has been domesticated through breeding out violent men by the state. HBD chick & Jayman are arguing that the state replaced clan violence and directed it toward its enemies. It‘s really a question of whether cooperation with strangers on a mass scale occurred before or after the rise of the state. They agree on most things, “Yes, I see the two processes as being complementary. The dissolution of clannishness was both a cause and an effect of the pacification of social relations.”—-Bret Lynn
While we consider the central problem the state, the state is the result of suppressing private impositions while preserving political rents to pay for that suppression.
But the central problem we face if we wish to reduce or eliminate the interference and rent seeking of the state, is to eliminate by way of the common law, using positive assertion of property rights, all actions that produce rents, whether in public or private life.
First we centralize rents to suppress local rents and increase local productivity. Next we eliminate rents in order to suppress political parasitism endemic to all monopoly and all monopoly bureaucracy.
[I] think that anyone with knowledge of the intellectual history of law is keenly aware of the church’s problem of breaking up the large family holdings, and the law’s problem of preventing retaliation.
What I think has proven difficult for most people in the conservative and certainly in the libertarian movements, is the recognition that property rights must extend to cover all those impositions that invoke retaliation.
—-“Frost and Harpending argue that Human nature has been domesticated through breeding out violent men by the state. HBD chick & Jayman are arguing that the state replaced clan violence and directed it toward its enemies. It‘s really a question of whether cooperation with strangers on a mass scale occurred before or after the rise of the state. They agree on most things, “Yes, I see the two processes as being complementary. The dissolution of clannishness was both a cause and an effect of the pacification of social relations.”—-Bret Lynn
While we consider the central problem the state, the state is the result of suppressing private impositions while preserving political rents to pay for that suppression.
But the central problem we face if we wish to reduce or eliminate the interference and rent seeking of the state, is to eliminate by way of the common law, using positive assertion of property rights, all actions that produce rents, whether in public or private life.
First we centralize rents to suppress local rents and increase local productivity. Next we eliminate rents in order to suppress political parasitism endemic to all monopoly and all monopoly bureaucracy.
THE GREAT ERROR AND THE GREAT LIE TO COMPENSATE FOR IT.
(important piece) (solutions) (historical context)
America was designed to restore and preserve the Anglo Saxon rights of Englishman, for Englishman and the occasional Scot.
The constitution is an English document articulating English rights, for English men and their families, justified as necessary using Natural Law thought beneficial for all men.
The source of the declaration constitution and bill of rights was English, Anglo Saxon, Norman, Germanic, Indo-European traditional common law.
Everyone else is a free rider.
The constitution is not a living document open to interpretation but the most modern articulation in law of that ancient aristocratic egalitarian tradition, designed to require strict construction, by formal operations, and near universal assent in order to implement change. It is the most conservative document ever written, depriving the government, the court, and the people of the ability to infringe upon those ancient rights.
The error in Britain and then in the states, was the failure to see government not as a constructor of law, but as a market for the contractual construction of commons between the classes, holding different abilities, knowledge and interests.
And that as the franchise expanded with economic and military participation, the British and Americans failed to add new “houses” for the new states, colonies, classes and genders.
All political, moral, ethical and legal philosophy since the revolutionary period has consisted entirely of a series of convenient lies, justifications, and errors by which to compensate for the failure to extend the classical liberal model to allow citizens to construct a market for contractual commons, maintain separation of law and contract creation, and to convert from ascent by majority rule to dissent via suit in court of law by universal standing.
But the progressive lies are just that. Lies. The constitution is the most strictly constructed, empirically demanding, operationally articulated document in history.
And progressives have sought to destroy it for the better part of two centuries while lauding the power the errors of the British and Americans granted them to do so.
This is the greatest legal deception in human history third only to the forcible introduction of Christianity, and the universal deceit of scriptural monotheism.
Perhaps I should claim Propertarianism was written in metal tablets buried in the ground or handed to me in a burning bush or visited to me in my dreams, rather than the product oaf a life-long search to the problem of political and ethical conflict that has plagued us since 1960.
But no. That would be a violation of those ancient traditions: speak the truth even if it means your death.
All else follows from that expensive payment in exchange for reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 04:39:00 UTC
Truth is Enough to save us. The common law is enough of an institution. Our history is enough for myth – and its true.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 01:00:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629094537269497856
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628728169890058240
IN REPLY TO:
@AliceTeller
It is easy to mock images from castles to anime but we need myths that uplift or we are left to stare at the gutter and call it clean.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628728169890058240
Land, Air, Water, Infrastructure, and Information. We can protect these commons with universal standing under the common law. #NRx #tcot
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 16:49:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628971092229652480
The founders captured Natural Law (property) but lacked current knowledge by which to require strict construction of law.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 07:15:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628826739687485440
Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628820677903036420
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628820677903036420
Which constitution? The one with the second amendment and the fourteenth, or the one without them?
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-05 06:05:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628809018853736448
Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628606475573661696
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/628606475573661696
GENETIC PACIFICATION: THE PROBLEM OF RETALIATION
I think that anyone with knowledge of the intellectual history of law is keenly aware of the church’s problem of breaking up the large family holdings, and the law’s problem of preventing retaliation. What I think has proven difficult for most people in the conservative and certainly in the libertarian movements, is the recognition that property rights must extend to cover all those impositions that invoke retaliation. While we consider the central problem the state, the state is the result of suppressing private impositions while preserving political rents. But the central problem we face if we wish to reduce or elminate the interference and rent seeking of the state, is to eliminate by way of the common law, by positive assertion of property rights, all actions that produce retaliation, whether in public or private life.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-04 04:34:00 UTC
Under Rule of Law, governments cannot make law, only contracts within the law. All else is not Law, but dictate (command). #tlot #tcot #NRx
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 10:39:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627790721727262720