[I] have no problem defending or ruling other peoples. These are both moral and costly. I have a problem with governing other people. And profiting from it. Why? Because defense and rule of law are universal truths. Governing: producing commons, are preferences and strategies. I consider that none of even the most enlightened people’s business. And worse, beyond their capacity.
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Prison is insufficiently objectionable and a stigma. But terribly effective at c
Prison is insufficiently objectionable and a stigma. But terribly effective at containing young males.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-29 08:19:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670879642803400704
Reply addressees: @ShadFloss @HenkPoley @conradhackett
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670807043142508544
IN REPLY TO:
@ShadFloss
@HenkPoley @curtdoolittle @conradhackett but we know mass incarceration is a direct result of legislation particularly from the 80s and 90s
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670807043142508544
-
There is a great deal in statist law that exists to justify the courts ignorance
There is a great deal in statist law that exists to justify the courts ignorance.
Much of which is a burden on moral men simply because judges do not specialise.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-27 10:28:00 UTC
-
GOVERNMENT VS RULE There is a very great difference between government and rule.
GOVERNMENT VS RULE
There is a very great difference between government and rule.
Rule: the adjudication of differences in matters of dispute by non-discretionary rules. It is a purely prohibitionary (negative) responsibility.
Government: The means of decision making by which groups select a limited set of commons to invest in with scarce resources given the unlimited demand for commons.
I am not sure all peoples can easily generate judges capable of rule by rule of law. Although wth sufficient training it appears largely possible.
I do not think other peoples should participate in the selection of a commons for a people, only in the prevention of privatization of commons, or the socialization of losses into commons.
In this sense, colonialism is very different from adjudication. And my feeling is that most nations would benefit from hiring judges. And most would benefit from not being colonized.
Rule of law works over time. Law is a science. The production of commons is an extension of the family. It can only grow with the people themselves.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-26 03:11:00 UTC
-
The Only Thing That Melts Is Rule of Law #libertarian #conservative #NRx #AltRig
The Only Thing That Melts Is Rule of Law #libertarian #conservative #NRx #AltRight https://t.co/INsTFpZIec
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-25 16:02:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/669546614088933376
-
Only Thing That Melts Is Rule of Law #libertarian #conservative #NRx #AltRight
http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/669546614088933376/photo/1/large?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=669546614088933376The Only Thing That Melts Is Rule of Law #libertarian #conservative #NRx #AltRight https://t.co/INsTFpZIec
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-25 11:02:00 UTC
-
THE MELTING POT THAT ISN’T (worth repeating) — “The only thing that melts in o
THE MELTING POT THAT ISN’T
(worth repeating)
— “The only thing that melts in our non-existent melting pot, is rule of law. Everything else is just an expression of the ongoing battle between our genes that we call gender, class, race, and religious competition.”—
😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-25 10:42:00 UTC
-
To Eliminate The Predatory State, Eliminate Demand For The Predatory State
[E]liminate demand for the state and we shall have no moral cause for the state. Law must evolve as fast as a polity. The common law can. To eliminate the arbitrary discretion of authority, eliminate demand for arbitrary discretion by using the common law and property. Any conflict that cannot be resolved under the common law of property rights creates demand for authority’s arbitrary discretion. Polylogism, polylegalism, polyculturalism, polytheism, polytribalism: political conflict, economic conflict, undecidability of conflicts.
-
To Eliminate The Predatory State, Eliminate Demand For The Predatory State
[E]liminate demand for the state and we shall have no moral cause for the state. Law must evolve as fast as a polity. The common law can. To eliminate the arbitrary discretion of authority, eliminate demand for arbitrary discretion by using the common law and property. Any conflict that cannot be resolved under the common law of property rights creates demand for authority’s arbitrary discretion. Polylogism, polylegalism, polyculturalism, polytheism, polytribalism: political conflict, economic conflict, undecidability of conflicts.
-
7) Rule of Law. Strict Construction. Textualism. Property-en-toto. Informational
7) Rule of Law. Strict Construction. Textualism. Property-en-toto. Informational commons. Universal standing. Class Houses. Market Gov’t.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-21 09:14:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667994373787918336