So what if all Immigrants must
(a) buy insurance that they will be financially independent (and the insurer must return them if they fail).
(b) take ‘the oath’ of non-theft.
(c) cannot vote for until the fourth generation (why we should vote at all I don’t know).
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-27 08:55:00 UTC
INTERESTING SET OF DEMANDS
The Restoration of the Constitutional Christian Monarchy with Full Veto Power.
The Restoration of Royal Lands and Church Lands to the Monarchies.
The Reauthorization of the Templars by the Church, and the Transfer of the Vatican Bank to Templar Management.
The Distribution of National liquidity Directly to the People
The Reformation of the Church, and its Charter as natural law, Regionalism, Nationalism tribalism and familialism, in each Branch. As father of each, not father of all. Of paternalism not equality.
The Rewriting of Constitutions with Preambles of Strict Construction, Natural Law and Propertarian Ethics, including the Right of Association and Disassociation, as well as the transformation of the informational commons into common property with universal standing. The end of corporate protection and the extension of liability to all employees involved in any transaction.
The Prohibition of any religion not compatible with natural law as a subversive political movement.
The Elimination of all Sanctuary and Refugee Rights, policies and funding.
The Forcible repatriation of invaders since 1965, or the use of violence to require it.
The failure of states to adequately contain and care for their people as an act of war.
The Closure of the departments of agriculture, education, housing and urban development, welfare, social services, and the direct redistribution of those funds on an income and asset (balance sheet) basis.
The nationalization of Mastercard network, the direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers instead of through reduced interest rates.
The professionalization of banking and credit by extension of the series seven and equivalent test for all signatories. The requirement for holding 20% of debt the requirement for equal losses for state and individual.
The end of Obamacare, and the expansion and deregulation of Medicare, and the preservation of private health care as a two tiered system of expensive research and development by the affluent and commodity distribution of services for the rest.
The Swiss-ification of all european nations into militias and a restoration of the local regimental system by the conversion of the national guard into state-regiments.
The Distribution of Nuclear weapons to european states currently lacking them.
The Requirement that all nations under nato protection purchase energy products in US Dollars – the currency of NATO.
The Demand for a return of Constantinople and the Bosphorus in 25 years and the preparation for an orderly transfer.
(more later)
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-27 03:58:00 UTC
[T]here is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES. But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.
[T]here is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES. But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.
There is very little difference between the negotiated construction of the Pentateuch, or the Bible, and the American Constitution: they were the product of committees constructing the criteria for civil law. This is quite contradictory to the Indo European Tradition in which law EVOLVES.
But these things are constructs of man for the purpose of governing man.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 03:23:00 UTC
—“Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from which all others an be derived; amongst which are natural law, rule of law, and property rights – do we obfuscate gods in that we start with a near-infinite variety the further we go back in time; almost with one distinct God for each miraculously varying pattern; and as we understand more about power structures and humanity, the more we reduce the Godly behaviors into the individual and reduce the amount of gods to believe in, until, finally we have the individual.”— Johannes Meixner
(That is how great minds find patterns of similarity between previously dissimilar concepts. Awesome. )
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 12:46:00 UTC
UK CONTRACT LAW VS US CONTRACT LAW
You know the UK law is structured as terribly front-loaded placing huge burdens on ALL individuals and organizations. It’s like everyone is afraid of losing a dime, and spends a hundred bucks to save every dime. But you know, I know the source of it: (a) British desire to demonstrate signaling through moral high ground (b) continental hatred of entrepreneurship and capitalism.
American law is back-loaded so that if problems arise they can be settled logically in court, placing burdens ONLY on individuals and organizations that have problems.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 08:07:00 UTC
[A]lexander I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct a finished constitutional basis for rule of law. It may be impossible to imagine the means of production of commons that we call government within that rule of law. Because the basis of the rule of law appears to be a universal logical necessity. Yet the basis of government production of commons under rule of law is a mere technology that must adapt to innovations in knowledge. Just as the common law must constantly innovate in order to prohibit newly found means of imposing costs upon others against their will. So from this perspective the hierarch of law is:
Which is a bottom up construction of a constitutional order. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.
[A]lexander I am fairly certain that it is possible if not necessary to construct a finished constitutional basis for rule of law. It may be impossible to imagine the means of production of commons that we call government within that rule of law. Because the basis of the rule of law appears to be a universal logical necessity. Yet the basis of government production of commons under rule of law is a mere technology that must adapt to innovations in knowledge. Just as the common law must constantly innovate in order to prohibit newly found means of imposing costs upon others against their will. So from this perspective the hierarch of law is:
Which is a bottom up construction of a constitutional order. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.
(by Eli Harman)
“Make lying illegal and you’ll outlaw the truth. So what other “LAWS” do you want to make? What other power do you want to give to those who have power?”
[Y]ou misunderstand. My aim isn’t to give power, but to take it, and to hold it. In specific, the power I seek is not that of MAKING laws, but of enforcing those that I DISCOVER to be conductive to human flourishing and cooperation, by such processes as shall prove most conducive to the discovery of such laws, meaning, in large part, distributed processes. But that is not the whole part, because hierarchy and authority have their place too. Some conflicts are not decidable under law, because there may be no objectively “right” or “best” answer. But the role of authority is in pronouncing judgement in such cases, when there is nevertheless some benefit to being on the same page. And in the never-ending clash and conflict between authorities, we must suppose truth, wisdom, and justice to confer some advantages, though not all will embody or exhibit them, and none perfectly.