Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • MORE ON RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE More feedback. There is nothing wrong with the la

    MORE ON RULE OF LAW IN UKRAINE

    More feedback. There is nothing wrong with the law and everything wrong with the compensation for judges.

    If there are 8000 judges in Ukraine, and the average salary is 500-1000 dollars per month, the only way to fix corruption is to make it undesirable to engage in it, plus to vicious use the journalists and independent prosecutors to police it.

    That cost is roughly 8K average per judge per month or 750M per year. The problem is, that these judges would need to be paid and monitored by a third party of judges from the developed world for a period of 6-8 years.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 06:45:00 UTC

  • The longer I work on the necessity of a judicial priesthood, the longer I study

    The longer I work on the necessity of a judicial priesthood, the longer I study the Templars(bankers), the Inquisition(judges), the closer I come to the model I’m looking for. The problem is always paying for the initial stages. The first phase must produce sufficient confiscation that the men can be fed and armed. Yet wholesale predation on the islamic model (ISIS) is counter-productive.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 11:19:00 UTC

  • You see, I understand that you are not seeking truth but justification of priors

    You see, I understand that you are not seeking truth but justification of priors. I am concerned with law.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 08:39:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717995134353281024

    Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717994308490539008


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717994308490539008

  • The only moral philosophy I know of is the common law, under natural law, under

    The only moral philosophy I know of is the common law, under natural law, under universal standing and rule of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 08:29:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717992740747927552

    Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717992252526706688


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717992252526706688

  • Are you a domesticated slave? Do you pay interest on consumer goods? Is your rep

    Are you a domesticated slave? Do you pay interest on consumer goods? Is your reproduction controlled through law and taxation? You’re a Serf


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 07:03:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717971003050213376

  • One can say that the study of crime and law are the same. One can say that the f

    One can say that the study of crime and law are the same. One can say that the financial system and economics are the same. But they aren’t


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 03:22:00 UTC

  • Conservatism is Empirical. So is Our Group Strategy.

    [C]onservatism is Empirical (critical). SO it is natural for us to patiently let some idea fail, and then outlaw it via the common law once it’s become obvious. We can outlaw the abuse of free speech and return to the oath of truth telling. We can require the warranty of due diligence. We can punish offenders. This behavior is consistent with the preservation of sovereignty by preventing rule.

    It is also consistent with our lack of a written philosophy other than the law, and truth. It is easy to write down trivial methods of producing social order. It is hard to write down indirect methods of social order. We evolved an indirect social order. So just as it was easiest to produce mathematics, harder to produce physics, and harder to produce social science (economics), it was harder to write down the western political model. Physical law, Natural Law, Common law, truth, testimony, jury, judge, property and sovereignty. This is extremely difficult for people to undrestand. Why? Becuase like truth, it is a critical system of operation: we know not what is right, we only discover what is wrong. This is the west. We invented science in all fields because we practiced it in heart, hearth, home, myth, legend, thang, and jury.
  • Conservatism is Empirical. So is Our Group Strategy.

    [C]onservatism is Empirical (critical). SO it is natural for us to patiently let some idea fail, and then outlaw it via the common law once it’s become obvious. We can outlaw the abuse of free speech and return to the oath of truth telling. We can require the warranty of due diligence. We can punish offenders. This behavior is consistent with the preservation of sovereignty by preventing rule.

    It is also consistent with our lack of a written philosophy other than the law, and truth. It is easy to write down trivial methods of producing social order. It is hard to write down indirect methods of social order. We evolved an indirect social order. So just as it was easiest to produce mathematics, harder to produce physics, and harder to produce social science (economics), it was harder to write down the western political model. Physical law, Natural Law, Common law, truth, testimony, jury, judge, property and sovereignty. This is extremely difficult for people to undrestand. Why? Becuase like truth, it is a critical system of operation: we know not what is right, we only discover what is wrong. This is the west. We invented science in all fields because we practiced it in heart, hearth, home, myth, legend, thang, and jury.
  • “Language in law can be used to resolve disputes that would otherwise end in con

    —“Language in law can be used to resolve disputes that would otherwise end in conflict, killing, retaliation etc. Language in the art of storytelling can be used to transfer meaning from individual human experience to common experience.”— PM from a Friend.

    Beautiful.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-06 06:01:00 UTC

  • The duel was outlawed only because we allowed champions (substitutes). This led

    The duel was outlawed only because we allowed champions (substitutes). This led to the evolution of a series of hired murderers. It was this reason that the duel did not survive.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-05 07:37:00 UTC