Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • ( Brother-in-law and I talking about how wiring diagrams (blueprints) and progra

    ( Brother-in-law and I talking about how wiring diagrams (blueprints) and programming software and writing laws all require us to follow the same processes. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-03 08:09:00 UTC

  • 1) Insurers, not government provide superior regulation because insurers are pai

    1) Insurers, not government provide superior regulation because insurers are paid directly to understand what it is that they insure. Government acts as an insurer of last resort – governing the insurers, not the innovators. It’s the middleman-insurer that specializes in the technology, whereas the government merely specializes in fraud and crime prevention by regulating the insurer.

    2) The market is far better than our imaginations at both discoveries, finding opportunities to make use of them, finding means of immorally benefitting from them, and finding means of regulating them. As long as the market, the innovator, the insurer, and the government all do their jobs, we do not need to envision so much as react.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-02 11:46:00 UTC

  • I realize this is hard to understand, but in the simplest example, most cultures

    I realize this is hard to understand, but in the simplest example, most cultures conflate religion and law. Ours maintained the separation. We preserve separation and therefore competition everywhere. Because sovereignty is our founding principle -t hat which makes us westerners. All other virtues of western civlization derive from – are a consequence of – sovereignty. Our separation of church (weak) and state (strong) is just what we think of most frequently. Or our separation of powers. But these separations exist to preserve sovereignty. We merely justify them as good because we intuit the preservation of sovereignty as a good where most other cultures are incapable of producing institutions that can survive competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:37:00 UTC

  • ( evidence is to the contrary. Monarchy + rule of common law has the best record

    ( evidence is to the contrary. Monarchy + rule of common law has the best record )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-23 16:02:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812327413564796928

    Reply addressees: @DeplorableDame @AnnCoulter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015343111696384

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/812015343111696384

  • “If you act like rule of law doesn’t exist, then let me oblige you.”—Josh Jepp

    –“If you act like rule of law doesn’t exist, then let me oblige you.”—Josh Jeppson

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-12 20:32:00 UTC

  • Constitutional Convention? How about Hanging-Trees?

    ON LIBERAL CALLS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: WE HAVE OTHER IDEAS – HANGING TREES FOR THE LIARS. No we are not having a constitutional convention. 1) Liberals have destroyed the constitution’s rule of law by arguing that we can pass whatever laws we want. The 14th amendment alone invalidated the constitution. What damage wasn’t done then was done by the income tax. What wasn’t done then was done by Roosevelt’s threat to stack the supreme court if we didn’t enact social security. If we can pass abortion, gay marriage, and obamacare, and if we have circumvented the amendment and convention process, then rule of law no longer exists. the government exists only out of habit, and simply hasn’t created enough discord to cause a revolution – until now.
    2) So lets just skip yet another leftist lie. There is no united states any longer, because there is no constitution any longer, because there is no rule of law any longer, because the liberals destroyed rule of law in order to destroy the united states by achieving through immigration of the third world against the will of the people in order to destroy the united states by an act of fraud.. 3) So here is what we suggest: the moment you call for a convention you’re declaring war. And we WANT a war. We love war. It is our greatest achievement after truth. We can agree that the undesirable states with the immigrant cities leave the union, freeing us from generations of accumulated debt and expense, and cultural and genetic conquest. Preserving the government. Or we can remove all federal legislation and return it to the states, and dissolve the supreme court, the congress and the presidency, leaving only the Military, the Treasury, and The Insurer of Last Resort, to be managed by a board of the governors. Or we will end the united states and devolve into separate regional polities that reflect regional cultures, and abandon the federal government entirely, returning all powers and functions to the regions or states. Or we can start a civil war, kill as many of each other and the members of the government that we can – and let the chips fall where they may. But what we will NOT do is allow the liberals to use the pretense of rule of law to engineer a conquest of our people, culture, and territories We’ll kill all of you first – and revel in it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Constitutional Convention? How about Hanging-Trees?

    ON LIBERAL CALLS FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION: WE HAVE OTHER IDEAS – HANGING TREES FOR THE LIARS. No we are not having a constitutional convention. 1) Liberals have destroyed the constitution’s rule of law by arguing that we can pass whatever laws we want. The 14th amendment alone invalidated the constitution. What damage wasn’t done then was done by the income tax. What wasn’t done then was done by Roosevelt’s threat to stack the supreme court if we didn’t enact social security. If we can pass abortion, gay marriage, and obamacare, and if we have circumvented the amendment and convention process, then rule of law no longer exists. the government exists only out of habit, and simply hasn’t created enough discord to cause a revolution – until now.
    2) So lets just skip yet another leftist lie. There is no united states any longer, because there is no constitution any longer, because there is no rule of law any longer, because the liberals destroyed rule of law in order to destroy the united states by achieving through immigration of the third world against the will of the people in order to destroy the united states by an act of fraud.. 3) So here is what we suggest: the moment you call for a convention you’re declaring war. And we WANT a war. We love war. It is our greatest achievement after truth. We can agree that the undesirable states with the immigrant cities leave the union, freeing us from generations of accumulated debt and expense, and cultural and genetic conquest. Preserving the government. Or we can remove all federal legislation and return it to the states, and dissolve the supreme court, the congress and the presidency, leaving only the Military, the Treasury, and The Insurer of Last Resort, to be managed by a board of the governors. Or we will end the united states and devolve into separate regional polities that reflect regional cultures, and abandon the federal government entirely, returning all powers and functions to the regions or states. Or we can start a civil war, kill as many of each other and the members of the government that we can – and let the chips fall where they may. But what we will NOT do is allow the liberals to use the pretense of rule of law to engineer a conquest of our people, culture, and territories We’ll kill all of you first – and revel in it. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Hayek identified all the pieces: Information and the Law. But he couldn’t put it

    Hayek identified all the pieces: Information and the Law. But he couldn’t put it all together.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 00:54:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805576013497376768

    Reply addressees: @BarisBayram2045 @FriedrichHayek @JohnDanaher

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805567494211694593

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BarisBayram2045

    “Understanding Hayek’s Knowledge Argument (1):
    Prices as Signals”
    by @JohnDanaher
    https://t.co/cmuFnec7x1
    @FriedrichHayek
    (good-read)

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805567494211694593

  • ANN: Unless we change the constitution, and restore the monarchy…. 😉

    ANN: Unless we change the constitution, and restore the monarchy…. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 19:06:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805488366829600768

    Reply addressees: @AnnCoulter @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803395923233636352

    IN REPLY TO:

    @AnnCoulter

    Tragedy at OSU today: Trump can only serve two terms.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803395923233636352

  • KANT IS NO LONGER CONFOUNDED — ‘What is law?’ may be said to be about as embar

    KANT IS NO LONGER CONFOUNDED

    — ‘What is law?’ may be said to be about as embarrassing to the jurist as the well-know question ‘What is Truth?’ is to the logician.”—Immanuel Kant

    Except with Propertarianism, and Testimonialism, we can answer both those questions ‘perfectly’.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 19:06:00 UTC