Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • “An interesting figure from Richard Hanania’s recent book “Origins of Woke.” Mor

    –“An interesting figure from Richard Hanania’s recent book “Origins of Woke.” More evidence that woke is downstream from law. It seems we could make use of figures using this template as well.”– Via Staff (from elsewhere)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-26 16:16:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717575975855177733

  • RT @NatLawInstitute: @BOB37702515 @curtdoolittle Culture, including religion, is

    RT @NatLawInstitute: @BOB37702515 @curtdoolittle Culture, including religion, is downstream from law. Always has been.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 17:17:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717228817620599078

  • Sorry Shane, I ‘might have missed the intent of your original question because i

    Sorry Shane, I ‘might have missed the intent of your original question because it was late and I was tired.

    I interpreted the term settlement in the legal sense of a resolution of differences.

    I think you mean settlement in the sense of homesteading.

    A settler is a general term for anyone. A homesteader satisfies legal criteria to invest in improving the capital value of the territory. So a settler is a higher standard of ‘demonstrated improvement in the asset’ than is a settler which just means you’re in the area for one reason or another.

    So the objective critiera is improvement of the territory by putting it to use for the betterment of the self directly and THE COMMONS INDIRECTLY.

    So i’m trying to discover a term that isn’t so fungible and easily misinterpreted, that, like homesteading implies the demand for capital improvement, but is more general rather than an analogy.

    EXPLANATION
    Both “settler” and “homesteader” refer to individuals who move to a new area to establish a residence, but the terms are used in different contexts and carry distinct legal and historical implications.

    Settler:
    General Term: “Settler” is a broader term that applies to anyone who relocates to a new area, often one that is relatively uninhabited or less developed, with the intent of establishing a permanent residence. Settlers can be part of larger colonization efforts, or they may be individuals or families seeking new opportunities.

    Land Ownership: The land that settlers occupy might be purchased, granted by a government, or sometimes seized from native populations. The land could also be part of a larger national or imperial strategy.

    Economic Activity: Settlers are not confined to any specific economic activity; they may engage in farming, trade, or any other livelihood.

    Legal Framework: Land acquisition by settlers is usually governed by the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which the land is located. This could range from formal land deeds to customary or traditional rights.

    Historical Context: The term is often used to describe individuals who were part of larger movements of population expansion, such as European settlers in the Americas, Africa, and Australia.

    Homesteader:
    Specific Term: “Homesteader” often refers specifically to individuals or families who acquire land through homesteading laws. In the United States, this is most famously represented by the Homestead Act of 1862.

    Land Ownership: Homesteaders usually acquire land by meeting certain conditions set by the government, such as building a dwelling and cultivating the land for a specified period. After meeting these conditions, they gain legal title to the property.

    Economic Activity: Homesteading often involves subsistence farming, at least initially. The primary purpose is usually agricultural development of the land.

    Legal Framework: Homesteading is typically regulated by specific laws that outline the conditions under which land can be claimed and ownership established.

    Historical Context: The term is often associated with westward expansion in the United States during the 19th and early 20th centuries, but it also applies in other contexts where similar land-grant systems exist.

    Comparison:
    Scope: All homesteaders are settlers, but not all settlers are homesteaders.

    Land Acquisition: Homesteaders usually acquire land through specific legal frameworks that require them to fulfill certain conditions. Settlers may acquire land through a variety of means.

    Intent: Both aim to establish a permanent residence, but homesteaders usually have more specific legal and agricultural obligations to meet.

    Economic Activity: Homesteaders are usually more focused on agricultural development, at least initially, while settlers have a broader range of economic activities.

    By understanding these distinctions, one gains a clearer conceptual grasp of land acquisition and settlement practices, particularly in contexts where legal and historical factors play a significant role.

    Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 17:09:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717226923498049536

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717212596841894232

  • determining ownership

    determining ownership.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 12:13:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717152507468624287

    Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717145045193687435

  • Well we have explored that avenue but it’s not possible. That doesn’t mean we ca

    Well we have explored that avenue but it’s not possible. That doesn’t mean we can’t have a law that is equally as thorough and enforcible in the suppression of undesirable behavior by undesirables. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:46:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716994582204834088

    Reply addressees: @entelechhhy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716977687334428808

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @samuelcpaiva @OMTyme2Shine @jacksonhinklle You’re confusing

    RT @curtdoolittle: @samuelcpaiva @OMTyme2Shine @jacksonhinklle You’re confusing the priority of democracy with the priorty of rule of law.…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 21:56:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716936615598387550

  • You’re confusing the priority of democracy with the priorty of rule of law. Amer

    You’re confusing the priority of democracy with the priorty of rule of law. American propagandists drank the anti-communist cool aid, and forgot that democracy is the reward for rule of law. It isn’t the means of producing rule of law. Democratically elected parasites and despots…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 21:12:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716925560243229059

    Reply addressees: @samuelcpaiva @OMTyme2Shine @jacksonhinklle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716919473809326151

  • We have (I have, our organization has) done the work to equally constrain female

    We have (I have, our organization has) done the work to equally constrain female antisocial behavior as we have male antisocial behavior. It’s law. It will work. And it applies to all whether male or female. The problem we face is that women have less control over their impulses than do men. So women need social proof and social reinforcement to ensure that women follow the ‘good women’ rather than the ‘mean girls’ so to speak.

    Reply addressees: @boxkicker2191 @BOB37702515


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 15:14:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716835537342832640

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716833032848527786

  • (Irony) I tried to file a motion in court today via their eFile system (electron

    (Irony)
    I tried to file a motion in court today via their eFile system (electronically). And when I tried to pay for it, the credit card company flipped the fraud bit on my card.

    Apparently credit card companies don’t trust the court system either. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-23 17:26:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716506407669801198

  • (humor) Visited the court today. Talked to the ladies (clerks). Said that when t

    (humor)
    Visited the court today. Talked to the ladies (clerks). Said that when they didn’t take the box of muffins I brought for them last week, that I gave them to the tech’s at the Hospital’s clinic down the road – and got hugs for it. The head clerk (who’s English) said they don’t do hugs. It’s not legal for them to give hugs. So (shaking her head) no hugs. So I told the three of them that I loved them anyway even if they wouldn’t take my muffins and give out hugs. 😉

    Small town life is awesome. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-23 17:22:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716505389666070528