Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Are “digital States” Real? Do They Enjoy Any Sovereignty Like Real Countries? Where Does The European Union Gdpr Come In?

    (Thanks for asking.)

    It is very hard for people raised in the current era of cultural, political, legal, and economic pseudoscience, to grasp the very simple reality that all forms of property from your body and mind, to your children and mates, to your home and assets, to your political rights, to your country’s territory, and all the patterns of behavior that you count on and benefit from every day, exist because of violence, and violence alone.

    Violence and violence alone determines control of yourself, your relations, and anything and everything else. All our organizations and institutions are but proxies for that violence. And only those capable of applying violence to preserve the order are ever in control of that order. And it takes very few people willing to use violence to end that order and replace it with another.

    So, a State exists as a State for two very simple reasons: some group of people possesses sufficient violence to prevent other people from having it. And other states prefer those people control that State rather than an alternative group of people.

    That’s it. In other words, States preserve other States – usually out of self interest: the preservation of the balance of powers in the region. During the agrarian era of the past, and during the current era where oil regions are so enabling of primitive peoples, we see Iraq->Kuwait and Iran->Syria, and Russia->Crimea (Black Sea deposits) ,and China->South China Sea.

    The same goes for digital anything: digital states, digital title registries, digital currency. They exist only so long as the states in which the servers exist, the people who manage them, the means of transforming the digital to the material, the people who use them, allow them to exist.

    I’ve written about this for years, but my understanding of history tells me that the digital currency experiment is merely performing private funding of research and development for the next era of state credit when the current postwar order deterministically fails.

    There is no escape from violence, or paying the cost of violence, in the form of the organization of violence, we call the State.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-digital-states-real-Do-they-enjoy-any-sovereignty-like-real-countries-Where-does-the-European-Union-GDPR-come-in

  • That doesn’t change the fact that the only criteria was age and birth, and that

    That doesn’t change the fact that the only criteria was age and birth, and that regardless of who made it into office the houses must agree for action to pass. By design, and what still differentiates american and continental law: our constitution doesn’t permit prior restraint.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 21:14:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975843013825122307

    Reply addressees: @realisticjules @CatoInstitute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975842115711356928


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975842115711356928

  • FALSE. No they are not designed as such. They are designed so that even if they

    FALSE. No they are not designed as such. They are designed so that even if they obtain power, they cannot wield it without the cooperation of the competing houses. Period. THERE IS NO PRIOR CONSTRAINT IN GOVERNMENT OR LAW.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:36:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975833383061413888

    Reply addressees: @CatoInstitute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975828519723859968


    IN REPLY TO:

    @CatoInstitute

    Political institutions in America are designed to prevent populists and demagogue from ascending to the presidency. So, why didn’t they stop Trump? https://t.co/HpAyYYYNWR https://t.co/BlpAfSX1bQ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975828519723859968

  • PENSIONS: The only people in any polity that should receive pensions are soldier

    PENSIONS: The only people in any polity that should receive pensions are soldiers, policemen, and judges, for the simple reason that it is the cheapest means of suppressing corruption among the people who are at the highest risk. Enforcement Pensions=Insurance against corruption.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:33:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975832752200265734

    Reply addressees: @AnnCoulter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975768835218288646


    IN REPLY TO:

    @AnnCoulter

    Why do government employees receive pensions at all? Who gets a pension in the private sector? https://t.co/8nqu3LPFLy

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975768835218288646

  • The laboring, working, and entrepreneurial classes need only understand that con

    The laboring, working, and entrepreneurial classes need only understand that constitution, and the processes of decision articulated therein. And the result of that law will be once again, a moral society in which good men and families prosper and parasites cannot.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 13:27:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975725391460659200

  • But the Constitution as it was written was a first attempt at formal articulatio

    But the Constitution as it was written was a first attempt at formal articulation of the natural law of reciprocity and the market political order for market civilization: rule of law. We can complete that project and write a constitution strictly constructed under reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 13:25:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975725024505155584

  • Constitutional Revolution

    Look: Truth, Formal Logic, Formal Language, and Law are Via-Negativas, and are not going to be as popular or as accessible as story, parable, analogy, and essay.Natural Law, Programming, and Math are not accessible.I’m never going to be popular for my formal work.Not my audience. If you understand my work it’s that I’m advocating for the best interest of the common laboring, craftsman and middle class and their families. And not for the priestly, intellectual, bureaucratic, or dependent class. That’s the end result of moral law: Producers vs Parasites. And so the conundrum is, that my formal work is in the interest of a class not necessarily able to access that work at a technical level, only DEMAND IT BE IMPLEMENTED. I cannot ‘dumb it down’ any more than we can dumb down calculus, programming, or strictly constructed law. But the Constitution as it was written was a first attempt at formal articulation of the natural law of reciprocity and the market political order for market civilization: rule of law. We can complete that project and write a constitution strictly constructed under reciprocity. The laboring, working, and entrepreneurial classes need only understand that constitution, and the processes of decision articulated therein. And the result of that law will be once again, a moral society in which good men and families prosper and parasites cannot. But to bring about a moral order requires the organized use of violence to alter the status quo -at high personal cost to those men who are willing and able to demand that change.Revolution is necessary for the preservation of our prosperity. There was never a better time for it.
  • CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION Look: Truth, Formal Logic, Formal Language, and Law ar

    CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION

    Look: Truth, Formal Logic, Formal Language, and Law are Via-Negativas, and are not going to be as popular or as accessible as story, parable, analogy, and essay.Natural Law, Programming, and Math are not accessible.I’m never going to be popular for my formal work.Not my audience.

    If you understand my work it’s that I’m advocating for the best interest of the common laboring, craftsman and middle class and their families. And not for the priestly, intellectual, bureaucratic, or dependent class. That’s the end result of moral law: Producers vs Parasites.

    And so the conundrum is, that my formal work is in the interest of a class not necessarily able to access that work at a technical level, only DEMAND IT BE IMPLEMENTED. I cannot ‘dumb it down’ any more than we can dumb down calculus, programming, or strictly constructed law.

    But the Constitution as it was written was a first attempt at formal articulation of the natural law of reciprocity and the market political order for market civilization: rule of law. We can complete that project and write a constitution strictly constructed under reciprocity.

    The laboring, working, and entrepreneurial classes need only understand that constitution, and the processes of decision articulated therein. And the result of that law will be once again, a moral society in which good men and families prosper and parasites cannot.

    But to bring about a moral order requires the organized use of violence to alter the status quo -at high personal cost to those men who are willing and able to demand that change.Revolution is necessary for the preservation of our prosperity. There was never a better time for it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 09:33:00 UTC

  • Constitutional Revolution

    Look: Truth, Formal Logic, Formal Language, and Law are Via-Negativas, and are not going to be as popular or as accessible as story, parable, analogy, and essay.Natural Law, Programming, and Math are not accessible.I’m never going to be popular for my formal work.Not my audience. If you understand my work it’s that I’m advocating for the best interest of the common laboring, craftsman and middle class and their families. And not for the priestly, intellectual, bureaucratic, or dependent class. That’s the end result of moral law: Producers vs Parasites. And so the conundrum is, that my formal work is in the interest of a class not necessarily able to access that work at a technical level, only DEMAND IT BE IMPLEMENTED. I cannot ‘dumb it down’ any more than we can dumb down calculus, programming, or strictly constructed law. But the Constitution as it was written was a first attempt at formal articulation of the natural law of reciprocity and the market political order for market civilization: rule of law. We can complete that project and write a constitution strictly constructed under reciprocity. The laboring, working, and entrepreneurial classes need only understand that constitution, and the processes of decision articulated therein. And the result of that law will be once again, a moral society in which good men and families prosper and parasites cannot. But to bring about a moral order requires the organized use of violence to alter the status quo -at high personal cost to those men who are willing and able to demand that change.Revolution is necessary for the preservation of our prosperity. There was never a better time for it.
  • Yes and I am educating you about the meaning of rule of law by the test of recip

    Yes and I am educating you about the meaning of rule of law by the test of reciprocity that prevents rule by discretion. Yet these very people destroyed rule of law by intentionally selecting cases to fund and prosecute in order to undermine it. (really).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 21:35:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975485908152668161

    Reply addressees: @Communism_Kills

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975483633782882311


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975483633782882311