September 23rd, 2018 12:38 PM
–“Compared to non-sex offenders released from State prisons, released sex offenders were 4 times more likely to be rearrested for a sex crime.”— Feds.PERMANENT EXILE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
September 23rd, 2018 12:06 PM Working on operational reclassification of crimes
September 23rd, 2018 12:06 PM Working on operational reclassification of crimes today. (ack). Crimes are currently organized by severity rather than function, which fails to educate the people in the (simple) constraints upon their behavior. Was fairly easy to restore the right of men to fight and discipline one another for bad manners, and gossip, shaming, and rallying.
-
ON THE DEATH PENALTY Reposted by @[100015734649811:2048:Ryan Williams] —“The p
ON THE DEATH PENALTY
Reposted by @[100015734649811:2048:Ryan Williams]
—“The problem with the modern state is not that it uses the death penalty so much, but rather that it uses it far too little. Property in toto serves as a useful metric for what crimes merit the death penalty. if you use fraud, deceit, or some other non reciprocal criminal means of enriching yourself at the expense of the commons above some arbitrary number, say 5x the average lifetime taxes paid by an average taxpayer, you should face execution.
Under such a scheme, nearly every tech monopolist, the Walton family, Bezos, any of the financial elite, nearly every politician and most high ranking bureaucrats would be liable for death. NYT editors lie in the newspapers and it costs 5x the taxes paid of average worker? Boom. no more problem with lying editors at the NYT.
The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics. Such measures might seem unduly harsh, but they are necessary. Brazil shows why they must be implemented, Singapore shows that they work.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 12:19:00 UTC
-
September 22nd, 2018 12:19 PM ON THE DEATH PENALTY Reposted by @[100015734649811
September 22nd, 2018 12:19 PM ON THE DEATH PENALTY
Reposted by @[100015734649811:2048:Ryan Williams]—“The problem with the modern state is not that it uses the death penalty so much, but rather that it uses it far too little. Property in toto serves as a useful metric for what crimes merit the death penalty. if you use fraud, deceit, or some other non reciprocal criminal means of enriching yourself at the expense of the commons above some arbitrary number, say 5x the average lifetime taxes paid by an average taxpayer, you should face execution. Under such a scheme, nearly every tech monopolist, the Walton family, Bezos, any of the financial elite, nearly every politician and most high ranking bureaucrats would be liable for death. NYT editors lie in the newspapers and it costs 5x the taxes paid of average worker? Boom. no more problem with lying editors at the NYT. The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics. Such measures might seem unduly harsh, but they are necessary. Brazil shows why they must be implemented, Singapore shows that they work.”—-
-
September 22nd, 2018 12:19 PM ON THE DEATH PENALTY Reposted by @[100015734649811
September 22nd, 2018 12:19 PM ON THE DEATH PENALTY
Reposted by @[100015734649811:2048:Ryan Williams]—“The problem with the modern state is not that it uses the death penalty so much, but rather that it uses it far too little. Property in toto serves as a useful metric for what crimes merit the death penalty. if you use fraud, deceit, or some other non reciprocal criminal means of enriching yourself at the expense of the commons above some arbitrary number, say 5x the average lifetime taxes paid by an average taxpayer, you should face execution. Under such a scheme, nearly every tech monopolist, the Walton family, Bezos, any of the financial elite, nearly every politician and most high ranking bureaucrats would be liable for death. NYT editors lie in the newspapers and it costs 5x the taxes paid of average worker? Boom. no more problem with lying editors at the NYT. The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics. Such measures might seem unduly harsh, but they are necessary. Brazil shows why they must be implemented, Singapore shows that they work.”—-
-
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is “already dead to us” National Security
—The International Criminal Court (ICC) is “already dead to us” National Security Adviser John Bolton told the Federalist Society recently. The U.S. will, he said, resist the court “by any means necessary.”
Why would the Trump Administration take such a hard line against “the world’s court of last resort”? Founded in 2002, in the wake of the Rwandan and Yugoslavian genocides and mass rapes, the international body was supposed to try evildoers who would otherwise escape justice due to broken legal systems in failed states.
Opposing the court is not a new position for the U.S. or Ambassador Bolton. The Bush Administration refused to sign the court’s implementing treaty in 2003, contending that it would lead to trials of U.S. soldiers and spies by a politically turbo-charged body located in Europe. At the time, many European leaders opposed President Bush’s war in Iraq and questioned its actions in the war on terror, including rendition and holding prisoners indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay. Ambassador Bolton was even more prescient. He warned, in 1998, when the formation of body was first being debated in Rome, that it would be ineffective, unaccountable and overly political.”—-
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 18:53:00 UTC
-
Ok. I woke up late. It’s noon. And now I have to work on Tort Reform for the res
Ok. I woke up late. It’s noon. And now I have to work on Tort Reform for the rest of the day. which means I’m going to get into another bad mood from contemplating how our people are abused.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 16:11:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043170966954758144
-
Worked on Consumer Protection yesterday and Tort Reform today. And, it made me f
Worked on Consumer Protection yesterday and Tort Reform today. And, it made me furious.
I mean. Our people are brutally abused.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 01:14:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1042945092040966145
-
September 21st, 2018 6:53 PM —The International Criminal Court (ICC) is “alrea
September 21st, 2018 6:53 PM
—The International Criminal Court (ICC) is “already dead to us” National Security Adviser John Bolton told the Federalist Society recently. The U.S. will, he said, resist the court “by any means necessary.” Why would the Trump Administration take such a hard line against “the world’s court of last resort”? Founded in 2002, in the wake of the Rwandan and Yugoslavian genocides and mass rapes, the international body was supposed to try evildoers who would otherwise escape justice due to broken legal systems in failed states. Opposing the court is not a new position for the U.S. or Ambassador Bolton. The Bush Administration refused to sign the court’s implementing treaty in 2003, contending that it would lead to trials of U.S. soldiers and spies by a politically turbo-charged body located in Europe. At the time, many European leaders opposed President Bush’s war in Iraq and questioned its actions in the war on terror, including rendition and holding prisoners indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay. Ambassador Bolton was even more prescient. He warned, in 1998, when the formation of body was first being debated in Rome, that it would be ineffective, unaccountable and overly political.”—-
-
September 21st, 2018 6:53 PM —The International Criminal Court (ICC) is “alrea
September 21st, 2018 6:53 PM
—The International Criminal Court (ICC) is “already dead to us” National Security Adviser John Bolton told the Federalist Society recently. The U.S. will, he said, resist the court “by any means necessary.” Why would the Trump Administration take such a hard line against “the world’s court of last resort”? Founded in 2002, in the wake of the Rwandan and Yugoslavian genocides and mass rapes, the international body was supposed to try evildoers who would otherwise escape justice due to broken legal systems in failed states. Opposing the court is not a new position for the U.S. or Ambassador Bolton. The Bush Administration refused to sign the court’s implementing treaty in 2003, contending that it would lead to trials of U.S. soldiers and spies by a politically turbo-charged body located in Europe. At the time, many European leaders opposed President Bush’s war in Iraq and questioned its actions in the war on terror, including rendition and holding prisoners indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay. Ambassador Bolton was even more prescient. He warned, in 1998, when the formation of body was first being debated in Rome, that it would be ineffective, unaccountable and overly political.”—-