October 23rd, 2018 3:56 PM THE CHALLENGE OF ACTING AS PROSECUTOR
—I may seem like kind of an asshole but my REAL problem is generally not going hard enough. I give people too much benefit of the doubt. I give them too many chances. As a result. They hurt others.”— Ely Harman
—“People confuse you being right with you being an asshole.”— Alba Rising
[W]e don’t need prosecutors to be nice. We need them to produce justice: Restitution, Correction, and Prevention.
October 23rd, 2018 3:27 PM ORIGINS OF MILITIA OBLIGATIONThe origins of military obligation in England and can be traced to the ‘common burdens’ of the Anglo-Saxon period, among which was service in the fyrd, or army. [T]here is evidence that such an obligation existed in the Kingdom of Kent by the end of the 7th century, Mercia in the 8th century and Wessex in the 9th century, and the Burghal Hidage of 911â919 indicates that over 27,000 men could have been raised in the defence of 30 West Saxon boroughs. In the late 10th century, areas began to be divided into ‘hundreds’ as units for the fyrd. The obligation to serve was placed on landholders, and the Domesday Book indicates that individuals were expected to serve for approximately 60 days. The Norman conquest of England in 1066 brought with it a feudal system which also contained an element of military obligation in the form of the feudal host. This system supplemented rather than replaced the fyrd, which continued to be deployed until at least the beginning of the 12th century. The Assize of Arms of 1181 combined the two systems by dividing the free population into four categories according to wealth and prescribing the weapons each was to maintain. The first category corresponded to the feudal host, the next two corresponded to the old fyrd and the last to a general levy. The Statute of Winchester in 1285 introduced two more non-feudal categories to impose a general military obligation on all able-bodied males, including non-free, between the ages of 15 and 60, and updated the prescribed weaponry in the light of developments in warfare at the time.[2][3] Because it was not practical to call out every man, King Edward I introduced a system whereby local gentry were authorised to conduct commissions of array to select those who would actually be called for military service
October 23rd, 2018 3:27 PM ORIGINS OF MILITIA OBLIGATIONThe origins of military obligation in England and can be traced to the ‘common burdens’ of the Anglo-Saxon period, among which was service in the fyrd, or army. [T]here is evidence that such an obligation existed in the Kingdom of Kent by the end of the 7th century, Mercia in the 8th century and Wessex in the 9th century, and the Burghal Hidage of 911â919 indicates that over 27,000 men could have been raised in the defence of 30 West Saxon boroughs. In the late 10th century, areas began to be divided into ‘hundreds’ as units for the fyrd. The obligation to serve was placed on landholders, and the Domesday Book indicates that individuals were expected to serve for approximately 60 days. The Norman conquest of England in 1066 brought with it a feudal system which also contained an element of military obligation in the form of the feudal host. This system supplemented rather than replaced the fyrd, which continued to be deployed until at least the beginning of the 12th century. The Assize of Arms of 1181 combined the two systems by dividing the free population into four categories according to wealth and prescribing the weapons each was to maintain. The first category corresponded to the feudal host, the next two corresponded to the old fyrd and the last to a general levy. The Statute of Winchester in 1285 introduced two more non-feudal categories to impose a general military obligation on all able-bodied males, including non-free, between the ages of 15 and 60, and updated the prescribed weaponry in the light of developments in warfare at the time.[2][3] Because it was not practical to call out every man, King Edward I introduced a system whereby local gentry were authorised to conduct commissions of array to select those who would actually be called for military service
THE CHALLENGE OF ACTING AS PROSECUTOR
—I may seem like kind of an asshole but my REAL problem is generally not going hard enough. I give people too much benefit of the doubt. I give them too many chances. As a result. They hurt others.”— Ely Harman
—“People confuse you being right with you being an asshole.”— Alba Rising
We don’t need prosecutors to be nice. We need them to produce justice: Restitution, Correction, and Prevention.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 15:56:00 UTC
ORIGINS OF MILITIA OBLIGATION
***The origins of military obligation in England and can be traced to the ‘common burdens’ of the Anglo-Saxon period, among which was service in the fyrd, or army.***
There is evidence that such an obligation existed in the Kingdom of Kent by the end of the 7th century, Mercia in the 8th century and Wessex in the 9th century, and the Burghal Hidage of 911–919 indicates that over 27,000 men could have been raised in the defence of 30 West Saxon boroughs. In the late 10th century, areas began to be divided into ‘hundreds’ as units for the fyrd. The obligation to serve was placed on landholders, and the Domesday Book indicates that individuals were expected to serve for approximately 60 days.
The Norman conquest of England in 1066 brought with it a feudal system which also contained an element of military obligation in the form of the feudal host. This system supplemented rather than replaced the fyrd, which continued to be deployed until at least the beginning of the 12th century. The Assize of Arms of 1181 combined the two systems by dividing the free population into four categories according to wealth and prescribing the weapons each was to maintain. The first category corresponded to the feudal host, the next two corresponded to the old fyrd and the last to a general levy. The Statute of Winchester in 1285 introduced two more non-feudal categories to impose a general military obligation on all able-bodied males, including non-free, between the ages of 15 and 60, and updated the prescribed weaponry in the light of developments in warfare at the time.[2][3]
Because it was not practical to call out every man, King Edward I introduced a system whereby local gentry were authorised to conduct commissions of array to select those who would actually be called for military service
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 15:27:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44737078_10156728338182264_4914342588430942208_n_10156728338177264.jpg THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.James SantagataStar Chamber.Oct 23, 2018, 2:58 PMJoffre CrossThat does look to be a rather exceptional branch for the purpose at handOct 23, 2018, 3:02 PMCorbus AureliusLiterally lesson learned.Oct 23, 2018, 3:08 PMCurt Doolittle( That’s the best response to any post. thanks. Some people ‘get’ the idea I’m putting across, and some don’t. Happiest when you (they) do. ) -hugsOct 23, 2018, 3:11 PMCorbus AureliusCurt Doolittle And thank you for all your effort and creativity. I become a bit more nuanced in my ability to explain positions I think are valuable every post you make.Oct 23, 2018, 3:31 PMMicah PezdirtzMight be worth discussing the extrajudicial function of the MSM in prosecuting noncompliance with the given narrative through shame, obstinance, violence, vandalism, etcOct 23, 2018, 3:56 PMCurt Doolittleok. now THAT is smart. You wanna take a cut at it? no?Oct 23, 2018, 3:56 PMMicah PezdirtzI might enjoy stumbling through itOct 23, 2018, 3:57 PMMicah PezdirtzJournalists (and so called comedians, actors, celebrities) utilize praise and blame to implant positive and negative sentiments in those who lack agency and cannot determine the validity of the claims. E.g. “Orange man bad” or “let the refugees in”.
Their audience then either pushes directly for formal legal action, or indirectly for acceptance of new (typically inverted) social norms.
(Sorry I don’t have the time to elaborate more, my attention is limited at work)Oct 23, 2018, 4:11 PMMicah PezdirtzThe point being non legal entities decide (judge) what behavior to accept or reject(verdict), and how to respond (sentence) without reference to legal process or precident. Their oligarchical process aims for the most totalitarian, profitable outcome as possible and it does so at direct cost to our commonsOct 23, 2018, 4:21 PMSkogi Brevikgood afternoon, daily reminder that the available data on lynchings indicate that the current justice system “targets” blacks more than “racist” former slave owning southerners did per capita and that, if this is oppression, freed slaves being lynched were less oppressed than blacks are now.Oct 23, 2018, 5:03 PMSolomon VolodymyrIf you want to see the definition of failure to prevent feuds, check out Albania…Oct 23, 2018, 6:04 PMBrett StevensEverything from the French Revolution is toxic.Oct 24, 2018, 10:17 AMTHE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 14:57:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44737078_10156728338182264_4914342588430942208_n_10156728338177264.jpg THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.James SantagataStar Chamber.Oct 23, 2018 2:58pmJoffre CrossThat does look to be a rather exceptional branch for the purpose at handOct 23, 2018 3:02pmCorbus AureliusLiterally lesson learned.Oct 23, 2018 3:08pmCurt Doolittle( That’s the best response to any post. thanks. Some people ‘get’ the idea I’m putting across, and some don’t. Happiest when you (they) do. ) -hugsOct 23, 2018 3:11pmCorbus Aurelius@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] And thank you for all your effort and creativity. I become a bit more nuanced in my ability to explain positions I think are valuable every post you make.Oct 23, 2018 3:31pmMicah PezdirtzMight be worth discussing the extrajudicial function of the MSM in prosecuting noncompliance with the given narrative through shame, obstinance, violence, vandalism, etcOct 23, 2018 3:56pmCurt Doolittleok. now THAT is smart. You wanna take a cut at it? no?Oct 23, 2018 3:56pmMicah PezdirtzI might enjoy stumbling through itOct 23, 2018 3:57pmMicah PezdirtzJournalists (and so called comedians, actors, celebrities) utilize praise and blame to implant positive and negative sentiments in those who lack agency and cannot determine the validity of the claims. E.g. “Orange man bad” or “let the refugees in”.
Their audience then either pushes directly for formal legal action, or indirectly for acceptance of new (typically inverted) social norms.
(Sorry I don’t have the time to elaborate more, my attention is limited at work)Oct 23, 2018 4:11pmMicah PezdirtzThe point being non legal entities decide (judge) what behavior to accept or reject(verdict), and how to respond (sentence) without reference to legal process or precident. Their oligarchical process aims for the most totalitarian, profitable outcome as possible and it does so at direct cost to our commonsOct 23, 2018 4:21pmSkogi Brevikgood afternoon, daily reminder that the available data on lynchings indicate that the current justice system “targets” blacks more than “racist” former slave owning southerners did per capita and that, if this is oppression, freed slaves being lynched were less oppressed than blacks are now.Oct 23, 2018 5:03pmSolomon VolodymyrIf you want to see the definition of failure to prevent feuds, check out Albania…Oct 23, 2018 6:04pmBrett StevensEverything from the French Revolution is toxic.Oct 24, 2018 10:17amTHE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History
The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)
—“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—
In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds).
The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-23 14:57:00 UTC
—“We live under discretionary law disguised as legislature (rule by law) oppose to rule of law (iterative and incremental approaching asymptotic perfect reciprocity)”— Bill Joslin
(perfect <3 )
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 14:35:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054380796042248192
—“We live under discretionary law disguised as legislature (rule by law) oppose to rule of law (iterative and incremental approaching asymptotic perfect reciprocity)”— Bill Joslin
(perfect ♥ )
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 10:35:00 UTC
PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT
—“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 09:49:00 UTC