WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
—“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 23:09:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059945842256343040
—“Does anyone have rights outside of what the observer fails to or chooses not to challenge?”—Anne Summers
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 18:11:00 UTC
WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
—“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 18:08:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45461930_10156760583642264_1311258179803283456_n_10156760583637264.jpg NO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS. WE ENACT NEGATIVE RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEM.Martin ŠtěpánAnimals are welcome to create rights for themselves, provided they can create a militia to protect them. I’m not too eager to say the same about AI, still a bit worried about phenotypical replacement.Nov 6, 2018, 4:33 PMWilliam J MullenThat “you can’t hurt them or kill them unless…” implies that they possess negative rights. Because they have no such rights, we can kill them with impunity, except to the extent that they are property and protected by the property rights of their owners.Nov 6, 2018, 4:34 PMCurt DoolittleThey can’t possess anything. we constrain each other, not them.Nov 6, 2018, 4:49 PMCurt Doolittlehence the importance of operational language and avoiding the verb to be, since it is literally impossible for a child, ai, pet, or domesticated animal to enter into a voluntary contract.Nov 6, 2018, 4:49 PMDaniel PerazaDoes this applies to females too,curt?Nov 6, 2018, 5:21 PMAnne SummersDoes anyone have rights outside of what the observer fails to or chooses not to challenge?Nov 6, 2018, 5:49 PMCurt Doolittleoh stop… lolzNov 6, 2018, 6:10 PMMarra McKinneyShouldn’t we protect endangered animals such as elephants and tigers from being killed by kneegroes and street shitting Indians? Tigers have killed plenty of Indians which I encourage.
I would rather have less subhumans and more animal diversity ie large mammals on land and ocean.
Diversity in wildlife is the only diversity I’d like to keep.Nov 6, 2018, 7:58 PMMatt TempleNature recognizes no rights. Rights are a purely human concept. Therefor animals have no rights.Nov 7, 2018, 4:32 AMNO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS. WE ENACT NEGATIVE RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEM.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 16:25:00 UTC
—“Does anyone have rights outside of what the observer fails to or chooses not to challenge?”—Anne Summers
WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
—“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—
—“Does anyone have rights outside of what the observer fails to or chooses not to challenge?”—Anne Summers
WHAT’S POSSE COMITATUS?
—“The purpose of the act is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel.”—
—-“Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference with facts (fits the world around the individual). Scientific law of Tort models the social world. With this knowledge, the polity asserts its good in the name of the state, and the individuals assert their will to power within those limits for fear of punishment.”—Nick “Rosenthal”
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 07:50:00 UTC
—“Have you read Robert D. Kaplan’s “warrior politics” legitimizing the doctrine of preemptive strikes….?”—
[L]egitimacy is a nonsense word. It means precisely nothing. The application of military violence is not a moral but practical question. We tell weak women and men it is moral – to quiet their inner child. As I posted earlier, both Sun Tzu, and Machiavelli wrote treatise to re-educate us to be hunters and warriors once we have fallen under the ‘moral spell’ of urban life. I read most of Kaplan’s writings, but this one was unnecessary. It’s obvious. An attempt to educate the overly domesticated polity no longer capable of rational choice.