Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING —“Curt, First of all, I’l

    A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING

    —“Curt, First of all, I’ll correct a point you make that is actually mistaken. It’s commonly made by leftists in connection with the First Amendment: …”The rule of law does not protect the people other than it limits the state, under the courts, to actions permitted in the constitution…”… No, it also obliges the state to protect its citizens from infringement of rights posed by others.

    … Two, the constitution is not absolutist. It is not law that encodes in itself as law indelibility. That being said, although I am not a constitutional law expert, I believe that it does enshrine a set of principles that cannot be controverted by subseq…See More

    —“…rule of law…obliges the state..”—-

    Does it?

    Read the constitution and find that. You wont. And its very interesting that you wont. The inference is in the preamble, and in the second paragraph of the declaration. Why? under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law.

    We bear the burden.

    We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule. The rule the left has sought to restore. By circumventing the constitution via the weakness in it: the supreme court’s ability to make law.

    “Every man a citizen, a sheriff, a warrior, a sovereign”.

    We are not continental serfs, or obliged britons. We are americans – and the state but a service like any other we consume. and if that is no longer the case, then we are equally permitted under our declaration and constitution to replace this government which restores our rule and revokes rule from that government-become-ruler.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 17:00:00 UTC

  • You tagged Brendan Hegarty photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47381804_

    You tagged Brendan Hegarty photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47381804_10156819107357264_319603024894885888_o_10156819107352264.jpg “WE’RE JUST LOOKING FOR ANOTHER MAGNA CARTA MOMENT”William L. BengeJefferson et al concur.Dec 2, 2018, 2:46 PMMegan K. UsuiAnyone see this Magna Carta film:

    https://m.imdb.com/title/tt1233301/Dec 3, 2018, 3:54 PM”WE’RE JUST LOOKING FOR ANOTHER MAGNA CARTA MOMENT”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 14:06:00 UTC

  • You tagged Brendan Hegarty photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47381804_

    You tagged Brendan Hegarty photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47381804_10156819107357264_319603024894885888_o_10156819107352264.jpg “WE’RE JUST LOOKING FOR ANOTHER MAGNA CARTA MOMENT”Kevin WuCurt, I think it’s time you got a bunch of barons together and held monarch hostage until he complies.Dec 2, 2018, 2:08 PMCurt DoolittleI like that idea. lolzDec 2, 2018, 2:08 PMWilliam L. BengeJefferson et al concur.Dec 2, 2018, 2:46 PMMegan K. UsuiAnyone see this Magna Carta film:

    https://m.imdb.com/title/tt1233301/Dec 3, 2018, 3:54 PM”WE’RE JUST LOOKING FOR ANOTHER MAGNA CARTA MOMENT”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 14:06:00 UTC

  • ANGLO CIVILIZATION HAS PERSISTED FOR A VERY LONG TIME BY MODERN STANDARDS: CONST

    ANGLO CIVILIZATION HAS PERSISTED FOR A VERY LONG TIME BY MODERN STANDARDS: CONSTANT REVISION AND RESTORATION

    You can’t control a constitutional convention. It’s a random number generator which is why no one will tolerate it.

    Forcing Surrender to a set of demands for a set of constitutional changes on the other hand has a consistent record of success in anglo saxon civilization.

    It’s what we do.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 13:50:00 UTC

  • THE COMMONS OF NOMOCRACY by Bill Joslin Nomocracy (Rule of Law) is a Commons. Th

    THE COMMONS OF NOMOCRACY

    by Bill Joslin

    Nomocracy (Rule of Law) is a Commons. The forms of rule, outlined by Aristotle, describe the cycle of competition to gain a monopoly over the commons (to seize control of it).

    Nomocracy exists as a commons.

    [Nomocracy, under everyman a Sheriff (contract and criminal law separated from legislative and regulatory institutions), exists as a commons, where all contribute via participation in lawful behaviour, as well as execution of the law and all who do so reap the benefits – a type of property.)]

    An end to the many *-ocracies (forms of rule which monopolize law) could end civilizational cycles.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 10:48:00 UTC

  • PIRATE CODE IS VERY CLOSE TO OUR ANCIENT LAW

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_codeTHE PIRATE CODE IS VERY CLOSE TO OUR ANCIENT LAW

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_code

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-28 12:46:00 UTC

  • (worth repeating) —As members of cults we are always in conflict over the lega

    (worth repeating)

    —As members of cults we are always in conflict over the legal systems under them, since those legal systems are arbitrary means of advocating different group evolutionary strategies of cooperation – all of which, under religion, despite their early utility, evolved to be more hinderance than good.

    As member of the Love of Man, of our Peoples, In nation-states, producing commons suitable to our needs, we are not enemies but allies in a division of labor producing the transcendence of man.

    If there is a better religion than that I do not know what it is.

    But it is the one I am proposing.

    A religion of the love and transcendence of man into gods, not into the subjects of priests and politicians, investors and industrialists.—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-25 20:11:00 UTC

  • LAW CHANGES HUMAN BEHAVIOUR FIRST. SOCIAL SHAMING SECOND, REWARD THIRD. by Bill

    LAW CHANGES HUMAN BEHAVIOUR FIRST. SOCIAL SHAMING SECOND, REWARD THIRD.

    by Bill Joslin

    Law changes human behaviour first. Social shaming second, reward third.

    Subsumed in a world of business people who manage by leaning on the crutch of “incentives”(bonuses, commissions etc) I’m often aghast at how blind they are to the strength of disincentives in average workers.

    People, when under stress, will gladly take on opportunity costs to avoid pain (lose that bonus to avoid the continual abuse of a shitty client).

    We’re wired to avoid costs and mitigate risk almost to the point of death. When disincentives are suppressed (when we’re trained to behave properly), incentives come into play.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-22 13:05:00 UTC

  • The only measure is zero tolerance

    The only measure is zero tolerance.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 15:55:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1064185385125912576

  • PETERSON IS AN INDIVIDUALIST NOT SOVEREIGNTARIAN (a) Individual Sovereignty = In

    PETERSON IS AN INDIVIDUALIST NOT SOVEREIGNTARIAN

    (a) Individual Sovereignty = Individualism in LAW (in fact) not in ‘sentiment’ or ‘moralism’. Because only individuals can act.

    (b) The purpose of policy is the service of the INTERGENERATIONAL FAMILY, and NOT the individual.

    This is the hole in Classical Liberalism, Liberalism and LIbertarianism, for the simple reason that “one man one vote’ meant ‘one family with property one vote’ or ‘one business man one vote’ or ‘one familial corporation one vote’, and not ‘ one individual without demonstrated ability to produce one vote’.

    The priority of western civilization was and if it is to survive, must consist, in the combination of individual normative heroism, individual legal sovereignty, and the policy that gives all possible advantages to each individual intergenerational family, in its production of individual sovereigns.

    The word “individualism” masks this difference.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 12:13:00 UTC