Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • There is no such as eighth amendment in Ukraine, Russia, or in fact, anywhere ot

    There is no such as eighth amendment in Ukraine, Russia, or in fact, anywhere other than the west.
    Please stop behaving as a naive ignorant western privileged nitwit. 😉 They refer to you as the russian equivalent of ‘suckers’ by the way. In islam the refer to you as the arabic equivalent of ‘victims’ because you’re so naive that you’re easily taken advantage of. In fact, you don’t realize it, but they’re also calling you effeminate by implication.
    The world doesn’t care about your naive kindergarden morals. The rest of the world consists of grownups with serious problems and serious scarcity in an environment of low trust.

    Reply addressees: @MrWiggles64


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 18:18:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746235358797238273

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746233504839434686

  • Don’t lie. We all have opinions. Not all of us try to profit from them by repeat

    Don’t lie.
    We all have opinions.
    Not all of us try to profit from them by repeated disregard for the law despite being given every reasonable chance to stop. He wasn’t punished just for his propaganda in support of an enemy murdering citizens, but because despite being given every single chance to stop he continued when he could have just left the country.
    He wasn’t a good person by any measure and trying to excuse his behavior is no different from doing the same for any other criminal.

    Reply addressees: @Nikitas54124726 @TuckerCarlson


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 14:19:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746175042759639040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746146942877663610

  • Why do you think democracy means violating the law?

    Why do you think democracy means violating the law?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 03:12:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746007236843876418

    Reply addressees: @debthecohost @ShreeShindore7 @TuckerCarlson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746006406715629690

  • There is no record of him being tortured. But torture is common in the prison sy

    There is no record of him being tortured. But torture is common in the prison system. Even without torture rhey are in general ‘rough’ with peoople in custody. On the other hand I’m almost certain that as a traitor among an angry ukrainian prisoner population, that neither the guards or the fellow prisoners were interested in keeping him alive and most likely beat him to extort money from him, which is the only use they find in foreign prisoners.

    One prison near Kharkiv is a detention center for women. The Oleksiyivska Correctional Colony No. 25 is a medium security prison. And the City Detention Center (Міський слідчий ізолятор) is for holding individuals in custody. So I don’t know where he was held, but I’d assume CDC. But, given that he tried to cross the border in the southwest he might have been held elsewhere and my knowledge of that region is limited to relationships with the ‘mayors’ of some of the cities in the region.

    https://t.co/UEPQc5BqWg

    Reply addressees: @Oenoan @TuckerCarlson


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 02:27:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745995952010199040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745979088874156074

  • He violated a serious crime in the state, he was not a visitor, nor a reporter,

    He violated a serious crime in the state, he was not a visitor, nor a reporter, but lived in the country, with a family, and residency papers. If they let him go then they send a signal they will let others foreigners go, or that other domestics can get away with it.
    The law has three missions: reparations or punishment, prevention of repetition, and prevention of others from doing the same. They are following standard legal procedure.
    However, after they let him go after the first detention, he persisted in his behavior. So they arrested him and held him in prison, and then again, t his time after a much longer detention, they let him go with just an ankle monitor. Again, he tried to flee justice.
    In effect he did everything possible one should not do, which is flagrantly disgregard the state of war, the law, and especially disregarding the law in a time of crisis giving ‘comfort to the enemy’.
    So you know, he has had a pattern of arrogance and selfishness, that did not end with screwing his kid’s nanny, and running away from his family with her to ukraine. Or the financial games he played in. Or the games he played in hollywood. Or the nonsense he propagandized to young nitwits. If you’re a bad person and full of yourself eventually the world will catch up with you and it did.
    There is no injustice here. Just an arrogant idiot that should have taken his wife back to the states and done his criticism from there, or behaved within the law there.
    Do I wish he’d made it across the bordere? Of course I do. Do i wish he hadn’t died? Of course I do. That’s different from saying there is injustice here. There isn’t. If you are dim enough to repeatedly break the law, and do so with such diregard for the law, despite being given multiple chances, such that you end up in a BRUTAL prison system, among prisoners that want you dead as a traitor, and guards that feel the same, what kind of arrogant idiot are you? How full of yourself do you need to be? And you admire this guy?

    Reply addressees: @ShreeShindore7 @TuckerCarlson


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-13 02:03:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745989970769174528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745984166607380556

  • “ANCHOR BABIES” ARE NOT US CITIZENS? And how we have proposed fixing many other

    “ANCHOR BABIES” ARE NOT US CITIZENS?
    And how we have proposed fixing many other problems

    –“This amendment which I have offered, is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to… https://twitter.com/ryanswalters73/status/1745787550277505406


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-12 21:29:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745920852204408996

  • ISLAMIC LAW HELD BACK THE MIDDLE EAST – BUT THE FAILURE OF WESTERN LAW MADE US V

    ISLAMIC LAW HELD BACK THE MIDDLE EAST – BUT THE FAILURE OF WESTERN LAW MADE US VULNERABLE

    —“During the period of interest, an institution of great importance to Middle Eastern daily life was the holy la w of Islam (shari’a), also known as Islamic law.
    In principle, Islamic law covered all human activity. As a matter of practice, certain spheres of life were governed by rules divorced from religious considerations. In the politica! discourse of the Ottoman Empire (1299-1922) there was even a category of laws known as “ruler’s la w” (kanun), as distinct from Islamic law, and also a third category, customary law (orf), which rested on precedent rather than religious scripture or learning.
    In commerce and finance, two areas in which the Middle East fell conspicuously behind, right up to modern times Islamic law played a key role. People entered into contracts that followed an Islamic template and were enforced through Islamic courts. They apportioned estates according to Islamic inheritance rules. Residents of the region’s great cities obtained services mostly from waqfs, which were trusts formed under Islamic law and supervised by officials with religious training. Almost alllawsuits involving at least one Muslim were litigated by Muslirh judges, under Islamic legal principles.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 19:20:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745526186233507840

  • LAW MATTERS MORE – MUSLIM FAILURE DUE TO MUSLIM LAW –“… [Asking] why the mode

    LAW MATTERS MORE – MUSLIM FAILURE DUE TO MUSLIM LAW
    –“… [Asking] why the modern economy took shape in northwestern Europe and not the eastern Mediterranean, the typical answer would contrast western flexibility with Muslim rigidity. Through the Reformation, the Renaissance, and the Enlightenment, many would say, western Christendom liberated itself from Church dogma and gave free rein to creativity. For its part, the Islamic world failed to free itself from the fetters of religious custom. Islam opposes innovation, it is often claimed, so Muslim social structures resisted adaptation and advancement.”–

    However, it was the religion and the custom that prevented the reformation of hte law – and as I have written extensively, it is the demographics that generate the need for that custom and religoin that in turn generate ignorance and stagnation, that in turn generated the inability to modify the law.

    Islam like Judaism claims monopoly and finality that no other religions and cultures do -and this monopoly and finality is the reason both for the diasporic prosecution of the jews, and the civilizational failures of islam.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 18:45:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745517401267937280

  • It’s rather clear that the law must only via negativa, what not to do. the const

    It’s rather clear that the law must only via negativa, what not to do. the constitution what to do and not to do. And policy what incentives to produce to bring about a good. And that most difficult of challenges, is that one cannot bring about a good directly, only as a…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:24:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745300576882028672

  • ANGLO NATURAL COMMON LAW VS EVERYONE ELSE – (ESPECIALLY YOU KNOW WHO –“Among co

    ANGLO NATURAL COMMON LAW VS EVERYONE ELSE – (ESPECIALLY YOU KNOW WHO

    –“Among contemporary common-law legal practitioners and Anglophone legal philosophers, “natural law” often simply refers to any approach that treats law as necessarily having a connection to morality.
    This meaning is essentially the converse of “legal positivism,” which is often defined, minimally, as the contention that law has no necessary connection with morality.”–

    So there exist those of us who hold to the rule that if it is not moral it is not law as we may not be bound to that which is not moral. And there exist those of us who hold that morality does not exist, or is not relevant to the law, and as such law is whatever they say it is. WHne in practice they mean only that a law must be produced by some pretense of legitimacy, not that it must be moral.

    This is of course, because they have no means of judging what is moral -for reasons I’ve explained exhaustively elsewhere.

    The purpose of my work, is, in part, to produce a science of morality so that we can render attempts at positive law illegal even to propose.

    Cheers
    CD

    PS: In my world it’s smart and moral people vs dim and immoral peole but, hey…. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:03:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745295391082393600