—I have said repeatedly, fix the law the good will stay the bad will leave, and organizations that are hostile will be shuttered.—
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 00:18:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097289275564048384
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
I have said repeatedly, fix the law the good will stay the bad will leave, and o
—I have said repeatedly, fix the law the good will stay the bad will leave, and organizations that are hostile will be shuttered.—
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 19:18:00 UTC
-
PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW VS CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION VS LEGISLATION VS REGULAT
PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW VS CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION VS LEGISLATION VS REGULATION
Propertarian natural law used to create normative (political) law – but truthfully. Meaning that we must give special dispensation to devout christians to lie about magic nonsense, just as we give special dispensation to the Amish.
But in matters of law, no. Ie: we can re-christianize the public spaces etc, and re-paganize the public spaces, and re-lionize (heroes) the public spaces … if we want. We just must state that christians exchange prohibition on making truth claims about magic nonsense in exchange for free practice of the religion. And once that constitutional trade is made, it cannot be modified.
In practice this is what exists today. Except we cannot outlaw judaism and islam for being counter to natural law. Whereas christianity is only counter to the justification of natural law.
This is why these are problems for smart people.
They are hard problems.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 14:34:00 UTC
-
PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION The law exists so that those with material i
PROPERTARIANISM VS IT’S APPLICATION
The law exists so that those with material interests (power) preserve the value of cooperation by forcing people into, and limiting them to, the market, and denying them non-market means (within the limits of cost and ability).
Propertarianism explains how to use this law (logic) to suppress those forms of parasitism that are currently not, because we lacked a means of doing so. In particular (and I have only come to understand this myself over the past few years) it suppresses baiting into moral hazard, which is the general technique of exploitation that is in use. (including your sophism above).
P it’s purely empirical. “people do this”, “this is why”, “self interest of those with interests”, “where almost all but the marginal cases have interests.”
You can build any political order with P that you want precisely because it is an algorithmic logic (grammar), as long as you do it truthfully.
To falsify P would require you falsify rational choice, reciprocity, and self interest. To state you would prefer to built some other form of government no matter how honest or dishonest, productive or parasitic, would still be explicable in P, and peoples’ behavior under it would still be universally expliable with P, because P is not a philosophy (should) but a science (is). It is the science and logic of what we call the psychological, linguistic, social sciences, and political sciences.
Now you can ‘bitch’ about the fact that I use this logic to advocate for rule of law – the most parsimonious expression of that science – because you like or do not like that particular world (because it would crush ‘creativity in dishonesty’) which means ‘witty people’ have no more utility in their manipulation of others in order to obtain self image, social status, and various forms of influence. But that is the point altogether.
P is simply ‘true’. What you do it it is a matter of your (power-group’s) preferences. I prefer to crush the abrahamic deceits (baiting into moral hazard by sophisms, pseudosciences, supernaturalisms, and deceits) and to use this to save my people from their lies. Maybe you prefer otherwise.
But I am fairly sure that the mainstream will prefer my argument and policy recommendations over the alternatives and this lowers their resistance to its implementation relative to your alternatives.
Again. Please don’t try to be smarter. You aren’t in the first place (even close) and P is quite a superpower – just like reason, empiricism, and science were superpowers before it.
The more I use P, the better I get at it, the more I understand the revolution in human thought and experience that would be brought about is as great as the previous revolutions provided by western thought (reason, empiricism, science).
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 07:47:00 UTC
-
constitution vs legislature
constitution vs legislature
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 19:03:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096847612551065601
Reply addressees: @DataDistribute @CatlinNyaa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096835403145826304
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096835403145826304
-
Under the law itself. We can however create any legislation we desire as long as
Under the law itself. We can however create any legislation we desire as long as we do it truthfully. Do not (dishonestly) confuse the Law (Truth) with legislation (utility). It is hard to be intellectually honest when you don’t know what you’re talking about and won’t learn it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 18:07:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096833559652909056
Reply addressees: @DataDistribute @CatlinNyaa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096824152378359808
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096824152378359808
-
“Nothing in our Law will undermine your Faith, but your Faith cannot be co-ident
—“Nothing in our Law will undermine your Faith, but your Faith cannot be co-identical with our Law”—Nick Dahlheim
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 13:06:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096395415476490245
-
“Nothing in our Law will undermine your Faith, but your Faith cannot be co-ident
—“Nothing in our Law will undermine your Faith, but your Faith cannot be co-identical with our Law”—Nick Dahlheim
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 08:06:00 UTC
-
2) I do not know how to make the law accommodate christianity in the interim. I
2) I do not know how to make the law accommodate christianity in the interim. I cannot find a way in the law to accommodate the lies of christianity without leaving a hole for every other lie to crawl thru.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 03:55:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096256646400172032
Reply addressees: @Septeus7 @DataDistribute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096253308820312064
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096253308820312064
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52565983_10156987229382264_662987130
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52565983_10156987229382264_6629871303773913088_n_10156987229377264.jpg by Eli Harman
Canada’s gun laws aren’t terrible TBH. There are some more restrictive training and permitting requirements than in the states. But the nationwide registry was abolished in 2012 (Quebec has their own.) Some models are banned or restricted. But there are generally workalikes and lookalikes available. There are no transferrable full autos, but the import restrictions aren’t as strict. The real issue is just that there isn’t the same “gun culture” and people’s sense of popular sovereignty is totally invested in democratic processes and institutions (which are easy to corrupt and pervert) and not in the right to revolt, which is stigmatized more and celebrated less, compared to the breakaway colonies… (And the right of self-defense is weaker with basically no provisions for legally carrying or using firearms for that purpose.)Tyler SeguinYeah they REALLY don’t want you using firearms for self defense here.Feb 14, 2019, 7:21 PMVik LiBloody 5-round magazine capacity for rifles…Feb 14, 2019, 8:07 PMDaniel WrightSwitzerland has 45.7Feb 14, 2019, 8:11 PMKay MortonIf someone breaks into my home and threatens my family with their illegally obtained gun, it’s illegal for my husband to use his legalised gun to shoot them in self defense. However, he can knife them. … hmmmFeb 14, 2019, 8:17 PMBill JoslinThe history of Canadian guns laws is interesting (upto ’92)Feb 14, 2019, 9:15 PMPaul TrippMany parts of the world have been relatively free to disarm under the assumption that the American military, kept in check by American civilians, would come save them if their government became too corrupt and oppressive.
They’re gonna learn some hard lessons when that ain’t the case anymore.Feb 14, 2019, 10:18 PMDavid McCarthyDespite all the guns in Yemen(I didn’t know there were that many) the people there are still being starved to death…Feb 14, 2019, 11:41 PMDave Germaniukyou get around that by having “pistol” mags.
https://albertatacticalrifle.com/hikashop-menu-for-categories-listing/product/cid-8379Feb 15, 2019, 7:20 AMby Eli Harman
Canada’s gun laws aren’t terrible TBH. There are some more restrictive training and permitting requirements than in the states. But the nationwide registry was abolished in 2012 (Quebec has their own.) Some models are banned or restricted. But there are generally workalikes and lookalikes available. There are no transferrable full autos, but the import restrictions aren’t as strict. The real issue is just that there isn’t the same “gun culture” and people’s sense of popular sovereignty is totally invested in democratic processes and institutions (which are easy to corrupt and pervert) and not in the right to revolt, which is stigmatized more and celebrated less, compared to the breakaway colonies… (And the right of self-defense is weaker with basically no provisions for legally carrying or using firearms for that purpose.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 17:52:00 UTC