(FB 1550432062 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW VS CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION VS LEGISLATION VS REGULATION Propertarian natural law used to create normative (political) law – but truthfully. Meaning that we must give special dispensation to devout christians to lie about magic nonsense, just as we give special dispensation to the Amish. But in matters of law, no. Ie: we can re-christianize the public spaces etc, and re-paganize the public spaces, and re-lionize (heroes) the public spaces … if we want. We just must state that christians exchange prohibition on making truth claims about magic nonsense in exchange for free practice of the religion. And once that constitutional trade is made, it cannot be modified. In practice this is what exists today. Except we cannot outlaw judaism and islam for being counter to natural law. Whereas christianity is only counter to the justification of natural law. This is why these are problems for smart people. They are hard problems.
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550460544 Timestamp) CAN IT BE DONE? —“…can be done?”— I”m positive. But that’s because we can unite people behind law and policy not ideology, philosophy, or religion, giving everyone a win but no one a monopoly. All win and nobody loses. Because People follow incentives. People online have an incentive to signal. Online is a video game of signaling – not the political market. Policy will unite the clans so to speak out of common interest. Because common interest in progress is better than defeat in pursuit of monopoly
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550449107 Timestamp) —I have said repeatedly, fix the law the good will stay the bad will leave, and organizations that are hostile will be shuttered.—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550460544 Timestamp) CAN IT BE DONE? —“…can be done?”— I”m positive. But that’s because we can unite people behind law and policy not ideology, philosophy, or religion, giving everyone a win but no one a monopoly. All win and nobody loses. Because People follow incentives. People online have an incentive to signal. Online is a video game of signaling – not the political market. Policy will unite the clans so to speak out of common interest. Because common interest in progress is better than defeat in pursuit of monopoly
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550449107 Timestamp) —I have said repeatedly, fix the law the good will stay the bad will leave, and organizations that are hostile will be shuttered.—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550525318 Timestamp) —“What’s the Prop position on Bogging”?— This is the option of the court. The unofficial position is “Hell yeah!”.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550525318 Timestamp) —“What’s the Prop position on Bogging”?— This is the option of the court. The unofficial position is “Hell yeah!”.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550686043 Timestamp) No man has any rights over any other, except in the group’s righthing of a wrong before the jury. “The Rights of Anglo Saxons”. A man has duty to a landholder (sovereign), in exchange for land and service. This is the meaning of ‘sovereignty’. It is not ‘individualism’. It is SOVEREIGNTY.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550674797 Timestamp) TRICKS IN MATH, TEXT …. AND LAW by JWarren Prescott My wife and I have had this conversation several times. Being both electrical engineers we are used to not just regular college level maths, but engineering maths. The first thing we say when we see these internet âmath problemsâ is they are written either wrongly or purposefully to confuse. Many times there may be two answers due to this obfuscation and ideally, this is supposed to lead someone to say, âWait, what is really being asked here? What actual or physical problem is trying to be solved?â Because if all you have is a disembodied equation with no practical application and the parameters are ill defined, then there is no perceived difference between deception and incompetence. Think about this and how our current legal system is written.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550686043 Timestamp) No man has any rights over any other, except in the group’s righthing of a wrong before the jury. “The Rights of Anglo Saxons”. A man has duty to a landholder (sovereign), in exchange for land and service. This is the meaning of ‘sovereignty’. It is not ‘individualism’. It is SOVEREIGNTY.