Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547936697 Timestamp) “One Law. Zero Tolerance.”

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547914974 Timestamp) A LAW DEGREE MIGHT HINDER YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF PROPERTARIANISM by Daniel Roland Anderson (law) Depending on one’s academic and personal background, a law degree does significantly more harm than good when it comes to understanding Curt’s work. (Math, Engineering, and Philosophy majors can help. English Lit, Sociology, and Political Science will hinder.) Mostly, a law degree hurts, because one learns to conflate legislation and regulation with actual law—which you won’t learn in law school at all. And the version of Common Law schools teach (pilpul) will definitely do more harm than good because reciprocity has no role in the process, unless learning how to circumvent, distort, denigrate, and subvert reciprocity counts as a “role.” Law schools excel at this. Also, Dunning-Kruger will be an issue for most law school grads. The situation is actually worse than I’m making out, but I’m spending some time with a friend who grew up working in the fields with me, so I’m in a good mood. This kid just turned 32 and intuitively grasps the basics of Curt’s work very, very quickly. He graduated high school with a 1.7 GPA, played a little college football and then never held an 8-5 job—opting instead for work where results determined income 100%. He’s trained people and started businesses and is raising a family. He has a real law degree. 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547906664 Timestamp) —“I have a law degree and i still don’t understand.”–Shane Mark If it wasn’t excruciatingly difficult, someone would have done it before me. Instead, a host of intellectuals during the late 19th through mid 20th tried and failed. But since that time we’ve had computer science (existential) instead of mathematics (ideal), and cognitive science (existential) instead of psychology (pseudoscience), and economics (real) instead of sociology (pseudoscience). There are lots of shoulders of giants to stand upon in the late 20th and early 21st when I’m working. It’s possible to create strictly constructed law on one hand that is testable by computer software, and a chain of dependency that is testable by computer, and to provide the law, prosecutors, lawyers, judges, and the jury with a set of tests for truthful speech – which cannot be performed by computer. Law of tort is quite good really. Legislation and regulation are reasonably good in the anglo (common law) tradition. We just need these tools, universal standing in matters of the commons, thereby ending disintermediation by the state, and providing a via negativa means of competition (court) in addition to the via-positiva means of competition (markets). Now, increase the definition and scope of property (see property-in-toto) to the full suite of things that people act to invest in producing whether by expenditure of forgone opportunity, or expenditure of time, effort, or resources, (including manners, ethics, morals, norms, commons, capital et all) and it is very hard for special interests (and usurpers) to survive. And even more so, nearly impossible to seek rents (more on that another time.)

    • Eradicate false and ir-reciprocal commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational speech in the commons.
    • Restore libel and slander.
    • Prohibit baiting into moral hazard in the law.
    • Replace copyright with creative commons.
    • Eliminate consumer interest (yes, really, and it’s not hard).
    • Privatize (contract out) all bureaucratic functions.
    • Replace private pensions with public (they aren’t possible anyway in current and future economies)…. meaning adopt the singapore model of ‘involuntarily buying insurance to protect your peers from your late age poverty’.

    Much, more detail, but all of it is rather ordinary. I can’t write twenty pages here but just take it for granted that I’ve worked through these ideas in painful detail. We can depoliticize, de-propagandize, eliminate fraud and deceit in every aspect of public life, restore the civic society, halve the time people must work to pay off homes, drastically reduce the cost of education, and dozens of other great improvements and all it will do is end parasitism by the political, bureaucratic, and financial classes.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548086782 Timestamp) DECONFLATION OF THE LAW Legislation consists of assigning rights, obligations, procedures, restitutions, and punishments, and regulation consists of the same to enforce legislation. There is but one law and it is reciprocity. The FINDINGS OF LAW in the common law constitute application of reciprocity to disputes, and the recording of those findings as advice to all subsequent jurists. 6 – The Law (reciprocity) 4 – Findings of Law (application) 3 – Regulation (enforcement) 2 – Legislation (political command) 1 – Command. (authoritarian command) Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548081728 Timestamp) Um. Wait. A Constitution – formal expression. A Law – of all formal expressions. A ‘Religion” – History, Ritual, Oath, Festival, and debt to ancestors.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548086782 Timestamp) DECONFLATION OF THE LAW Legislation consists of assigning rights, obligations, procedures, restitutions, and punishments, and regulation consists of the same to enforce legislation. There is but one law and it is reciprocity. The FINDINGS OF LAW in the common law constitute application of reciprocity to disputes, and the recording of those findings as advice to all subsequent jurists. 6 – The Law (reciprocity) 4 – Findings of Law (application) 3 – Regulation (enforcement) 2 – Legislation (political command) 1 – Command. (authoritarian command) Cheers

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548081728 Timestamp) Um. Wait. A Constitution – formal expression. A Law – of all formal expressions. A ‘Religion” – History, Ritual, Oath, Festival, and debt to ancestors.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548132106 Timestamp) —“The idea of applying the scientific method to law is so foreign to this toxic political climate, the ideologues will undoubtedly try and burn you as a heretic for this.”— Kevin Wu

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1548132106 Timestamp) —“The idea of applying the scientific method to law is so foreign to this toxic political climate, the ideologues will undoubtedly try and burn you as a heretic for this.”— Kevin Wu

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549036184 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN LAW AND THE NEW “ABORTION STANDARD” The purpose of the proposed law is to restore euthanasia to babies under the pretense of calling it ‘abortion’. This prevents having to take euthanasia through the court system. Hence operational language. This abuse of the law, would not be possible under Propertarian Law.