Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • Besides, what do you think I’ve spent the past decade doing philosophy so that I

    Besides, what do you think I’ve spent the past decade doing philosophy so that I could repair reform the american constitution, our rights under it, our government, and our way of life.

    Because I knew what was coming.
    I’m not running away from it.
    I’m running toward it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 00:41:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178469775841906688

    Reply addressees: @FischerKing64 @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178469103130030091

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @FischerKing64 @realDonaldTrump You know, it just so happens to be legal in the USA to do what I do, you just can’t conspire to act. I don’t. Look it up.

    That said, I promise they know who I am. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1178469103130030091

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @FischerKing64 @realDonaldTrump You know, it just so happens to be legal in the USA to do what I do, you just can’t conspire to act. I don’t. Look it up.

    That said, I promise they know who I am. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1178469103130030091

  • You know, it just so happens to be legal in the USA to do what I do, you just ca

    You know, it just so happens to be legal in the USA to do what I do, you just can’t conspire to act. I don’t. Look it up.

    That said, I promise they know who I am. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-30 00:38:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178469103130030091

    Reply addressees: @FischerKing64 @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178468407420653568

    IN REPLY TO:

    @FischerKing64

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump If youโ€™re not on an FBI list yet, you will be soon. I would focus on the philosophy if I were you.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178468407420653568

  • THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION The issue in the first

    THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

    The issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=474942073102688&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 15:26:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178330121171820544

  • THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION The issue in the first

    THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

    The issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be the exception of christianity. I’m just recording that this exception, like the first one, is necessary, but will lead to the same problems, without a continuation of the reformation of christianity. We have at least Religious, Fascist, Traditional, Constitutional, Ratio-economic, and Scientific ‘factions’ that we must satisfy in order to form a more perfect union. Mine must sacrifice tolerance for christian abrahamism, the fascists must tolerate monarchy via negativa instead of a strong man via positiva, and the christians must tolerate the protestantization of christianity as a folk religion, the ongoing decline (3rd Worlding) of the catholic church, and our inability to restore churches to control of family law and education because of their doctrine, in exchange for defense by the state, advocacy by the state, and competition between theological, moral, rational, and scientific practices of christianity and our ancient germanic and slavic religions of nature and the hearth. In exchange we all get restoration of our nation state(s), and the permanent destruction of the second abrahamic attack on western civilization – all civilization for that matter, by a monopoly religion of the state.

    HIERARCHY OF LAWS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (TRUTH)

    … > Physical Laws

    … … > Heathen (Pagan) Law of War

    … … … > Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity

    … … … … > Christian Law Of Investment in Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:26:00 UTC

  • THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION The issue in the first

    THE OUTSTANDING ISSUE OF THE SECOND AMERICAN CONSTITUTION

    The issue in the first american constitution was the exception of slavery. The issue in the second american constitution will be the exception of christianity. I’m just recording that this exception, like the first one, is necessary, but will lead to the same problems, without a continuation of the reformation of christianity. We have at least Religious, Fascist, Traditional, Constitutional, Ratio-economic, and Scientific ‘factions’ that we must satisfy in order to form a more perfect union. Mine must sacrifice tolerance for christian abrahamism, the fascists must tolerate monarchy via negativa instead of a strong man via positiva, and the christians must tolerate the protestantization of christianity as a folk religion, the ongoing decline (3rd Worlding) of the catholic church, and our inability to restore churches to control of family law and education because of their doctrine, in exchange for defense by the state, advocacy by the state, and competition between theological, moral, rational, and scientific practices of christianity and our ancient germanic and slavic religions of nature and the hearth. In exchange we all get restoration of our nation state(s), and the permanent destruction of the second abrahamic attack on western civilization – all civilization for that matter, by a monopoly religion of the state.

    HIERARCHY OF LAWS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION (TRUTH)

    … > Physical Laws

    … … > Heathen (Pagan) Law of War

    … … … > Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity

    … … … … > Christian Law Of Investment in Cooperation

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-29 11:25:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIANISM AS MISNOMER by Alain Dwight A lot of libertarianism is a misnomer

    LIBERTARIANISM AS MISNOMER

    by Alain Dwight

    A lot of libertarianism is a misnomer.. no rule of law, no stable production of liberty. The problem is focusing on the outcome and not the requirements is a convenient means of deception.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 09:50:00 UTC

  • That’s because of weaknesses in the law that are readily fixed. If you are under

    That’s because of weaknesses in the law that are readily fixed. If you are undermined by cunning then the law is sh-t. What you mean is that people can abuse the law as its currently constructed. I can fix that (and have). It’s not that complicated in retrospect.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 01:41:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177760294367584256

    Reply addressees: @mikk_er

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177533379190935552

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable โ€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177533379190935552

  • PROPERTARIANS (RULE OF LAW) One brick at a time we build the intellectual fortre

    PROPERTARIANS (RULE OF LAW)

    One brick at a time we build the intellectual fortress of our civilization. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 16:04:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177614889038299136

  • PROPERTARIANS (RULE OF LAW) One brick at a time we build the intellectual fortre

    PROPERTARIANS (RULE OF LAW)

    One brick at a time we build the intellectual fortress of our civilization. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 12:03:00 UTC

  • LAW: PROPERTY MUST INCLUDE ANYTHING PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DEFEND WITH VIOLENCE b

    LAW: PROPERTY MUST INCLUDE ANYTHING PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO DEFEND WITH VIOLENCE

    by Martin ล tฤ›pรกn

    —“First, it is important to note that โ€œpropertyโ€ (at least according to libertarians) is a strictly normative or legal concept. It is intended to provide a social framework by which violent conflict may be avoided, and to serve as the philosophical benchmark for adjudication if and when such violent conflict does occur.”—

    Which is really all you need to know. If this is the purpose of legally recognizing property, it logically follows that we have to recognize anything that people are willing to defend with violence so that they can defend it in court instead.

    So anything that follows after this and claims some kind of property isn’t genuine or legitimate and doesn’t actually consider willingness to use violence is inconsistent with the paragraph above and mere rationalization.

    I still like C Chase and see he means well but he could have asked any of us before critiquing, if not Curt directly – there’s plenty of others ready to answer.

    (referring to a straw man critique by chris chase)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-27 11:26:00 UTC