Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-marxist, p

    I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-marxist, pre-postmodern, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the adjudication of differences in material property between the states, where hostile cities converted to city states.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 19:37:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185641029145419776

    Reply addressees: @PaulB76720253 @irenaissancemn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185639782417874945

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185639782417874945

  • “I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmoder

    —“I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmodern, pre-marxist, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the defense of the states, and to the adjudication of differences in material property between the states, and where hostile cities are involuntarily converted to city states, and where all local norm, custom, and tradition is determined by at the local level, and only investment at the state. … And I absolutely positively without question know how to do it – because the alternative for the “Left” is so terrible they will agree rather than risk it. That is why have confidence – I am very slow and deliberate and thorough, but I am very, very, good at what I do. It will take 1/3 of 1% of our males to make it happen, and it will happen quickly. And frankly we will hope the enemy resists – because “—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 15:42:00 UTC

  • PROHIBITING DEMAND FOR THE VIA-POSITIVA STATE The failure of the law of tort to

    PROHIBITING DEMAND FOR THE VIA-POSITIVA STATE

    The failure of the law of tort to keep pace with inventions in parasitism and predation, generates demand for the state to via-positiva impose rules of conduct instead of the law’s via-negativa prohibitions on conduct. This is why jewish-libertarian civs are impossible, and only anglo-rule-of-law civs produce liberty and freedom without via positiva imposition of rule by the state.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 11:01:00 UTC

  • DISAMBIGUATION OF JUDICIAL JUDGEMENTS I have done a little work on disambiguatin

    DISAMBIGUATION OF JUDICIAL JUDGEMENTS

    I have done a little work on disambiguating the charge misdemeanor vs felony (meaningless), but not enough on judgement restitution, personal punishment (prevention), and political punishment(prevention). These subjects are important because the current structure appears illogical to the public, because some crimes are preventable by political punishments (things that are planned) and some crimes are not preventable by political punishments (animal impulse), and some while seemingly more serious, are less likely to be repeated (impulses), while others more likely to be repeated (planned).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 13:15:00 UTC

  • LOANS AGAINST TRUST by Luke Weinhagen Law and contract can be used to subsidize

    LOANS AGAINST TRUST

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Law and contract can be used to subsidize for the absence of specific trust, such as between strangers or untested business partners.

    Both are “loans” against the stored trust in a polity. Enforced and insured by the commons in the form of “WE as a common polity will impose a cost on any party that breaches law or contract”.

    Law and contract only provide incentives for adherence where you can expect positive reciprocity (trust producing – rule of law) or where you can rely on the enforcement mechanisms to compel adherence (trust consuming – rule by law).

    Trust consumption eventually gets us back to “Might makes Right” and brings us back to the question “Why don’t I kill you and take your stuff?” (we descend the foundational rule stack). If trust is not there in some form, no one follow the law or sticks to contracts.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 18:05:00 UTC

  • THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, EQUALITY CLAUSE A look into the thoughts of Tho

    THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, EQUALITY CLAUSE

    A look into the thoughts of Thomas Jefferson

    By JWarren Prescott

    The declaration of independence’ equality clause refers to the equality of self-evident, unalienable (natural) rights among people – it does not mean anything beyond that.

    Natural rights of namely, Life, Liberty and Property. (and those rights derived from these such as self-preservation and defense)

    It does not mean that men and women should earn the same amount for the same work. It does not mean that we should initiate social reforms to assure affirmative action or racial quotas. And, it certainly does not mean that everyone is gonna get (or entitled to) the same opportunities as your neighbor. These are not rights, but they are coercion for resources.

    Jefferson was was very precise with his language and wrote the Declaration of Independence to make the case to england about the philosophical justification for secession and independence. he anticipated the counter argument from the royalist perspective, i.e. the divine right of kings.

    This is why he when to the philosophical basis of rights and that is natural law – in this natural state, there is no distinction of race, class or status. John Locke and Hobbes were influential in Jefferson’s thoughts on this.

    I would also say that Jefferson was shaking with fear as he was writing to the King. England was just about the strongest nation in the world and here is Jefferson assigned the duty to word a document in just the right way to make a logical and reasonable case and not be hung at the post…. Class, race or sex was the furthest thing from his mind.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 13:42:00 UTC

  • THE MEANING OF ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL ”…Created equal …” is an incomplet

    THE MEANING OF ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL

    ”…Created equal …” is an incomplete sentence. In P this would have to be a complete sentence. “…. are created by nature, equal before the laws of nature and the natural law of reciprocity.” It’s just poetic. And they use property or tort rather than reciprocity.

    ” … associated …” doesn’t mean anything. I can gossip and spread a rumor about you, and cause people to associate you with something negative.

    “… aristocracy..” meant and means rule by the best, in other words, meritocracy, demonstrated by military defense, achievement of wealth, and contribution to the political government of the polity.

    Truth will bring meritocracy. If we produce families producing consistent meritocracy over generations we will produce nobility. If we produce a government by people from that nobility, we will produce an aristocracy. If that hierarchy of merit is defended by rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity, by universal standing in matters of the commons, then it is very hard for aristocracy to survive without in fact surviving on meritocracy.

    Same goes for entrepreneurs today. The problem was removing the requirement that one demonstrate meritocracy in order to participate in government., We call this error the universal franchise. But that was a mistake. Furthermore, instead of the aristocracy producing policy and the government acting as a jury, and the bureaucracy enforcing it, we gave the decision to the government and removed the veto of the aristocracy.

    That’s the problem.

    Demonstrated excellence is the only test of merit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-12 11:23:00 UTC

  • WHAT HONEST ANARCHISTS ARE GRASPING FOR: RULE OF LAW Alain Dwight Anarchy is a r

    WHAT HONEST ANARCHISTS ARE GRASPING FOR: RULE OF LAW

    Alain Dwight

    Anarchy is a rhetorical illusion, it doesn’t exist in reality.

    There is no rule without rulers, there are no active nouns (rules) without actors implementing them (rulers). Every method of interaction has rules that are set and enforced by rulers.

    We want rule of law (suppressing free-riding of all forms regardless of rank/class) rather than discretionary rule (cherry picked application), and this is what honest anarchists are grasping for.

    The rest are essentially libertarians peddling the non aggression principle, which amounts to advocacy for discretionary rule because only some impositions of costs are counted while others are ignored.

    Most often, imposing costs by way of invading someone’s territory or subverting their social norms is permitted and so retaliation against such actions is considered “initiating aggression” while the initial imposition is not.

    It’s a great recipe for demanding access to low corruption commons and then calling it aggression if there are any demands or conditions required in terms of sharing the cost to construct and maintain the commons. It’s coerced association – ghetto ethics.

    NAP and anarchism generally permits blackmail too.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 21:50:00 UTC

  • While I understand the intent of the bill, meaning that they can’t be held accou

    While I understand the intent of the bill, meaning that they can’t be held accountable for the domestic use of information in an age of the internet, it is worded so poorly that it does in fact license propaganda by the state.
    Under P-Law this would be prohibited.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 20:36:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182756957758918656

    Reply addressees: @financydrew

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182742281104875521

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1182742281104875521

  • THE LAW CREATES TRUST, AND WE CREATE OBSERVANCE OF IT by Luke Weinhagen “Every m

    THE LAW CREATES TRUST, AND WE CREATE OBSERVANCE OF IT

    by Luke Weinhagen

    “Every man a Sheriff”

    In a high trust group this is not a request, nor a demand, it is a description.

    That is the nuance I’d like to add – that it is our individual willingness to apply the law, and to self-enforce, that is the difference not just the idea (other groups see those very same laws, interpret the same ideas, as weak points to exploit).

    The idea of law, and its individual observance and practice, allows trust to be the prime mover.

    (shifting from passive to active)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-11 16:20:00 UTC