https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9kNBO7_Y3o&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3bZfNy636AkLcvNfNOynY708CFUwMerGH8wzJDid6PK_IBdzDFuNzfrFw
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Inalienable Rights are Inalienable 😉
Inalienable Rights are Inalienable 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/inalienable-rights-are-inalienable/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 15:08:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234858141969526789
-
Inalienable Rights are Inalienable 😉
—“Regarding: “Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.” How is this done? Watched John Mark’s recent video with Curt and the topic came up, but it’s not quite sinking in yet. My best guess is it means I am obligated to defend those rights with words, actions, arms, etc., for myself (and perhaps others), otherwise it is a crime.”—Jack Scarbrough
Correct. None may speak or act to remove them, nor may you by speaking or not, acting or not, surrender them.
-
Inalienable Rights are Inalienable 😉
—“Regarding: “Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.” How is this done? Watched John Mark’s recent video with Curt and the topic came up, but it’s not quite sinking in yet. My best guess is it means I am obligated to defend those rights with words, actions, arms, etc., for myself (and perhaps others), otherwise it is a crime.”—Jack Scarbrough
Correct. None may speak or act to remove them, nor may you by speaking or not, acting or not, surrender them.
-
The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity
The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/the-p-constitution-is-for-usa-european-civ-and-humanity/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 14:21:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234846368843411456
-
The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity
—“Is the Propertarian Constitution, only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—
[A] general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as: – The Complaint: The reason for the reformation. – Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system. – The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations) – The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit. – The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts – The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.
-
The P-Constitution is for USA, European Civ, and Humanity
—“Is the Propertarian Constitution, only for the United States of America or all of North America and Europe?”—
[A] general constitution, with customizations for the american reformation. It is for any country in western civilization (Or any civilization) – presuming customizations. The political structure – means of producing acts – will vary most depending upon the tastes of the population. And the possible choices are listed. We tend to think government is the subject we should focus on, but it’s really the law, then the economy, then the government. Hopefully our constitution corrects this problem and refocuses us on the law and economics – even though our concept of economics is balance sheet rather than income statement driven so includes culture etc. It’s structured as: – The Complaint: The reason for the reformation. – Strategy: the ‘tradition’ of european peoples that explains the entire social system. – The Law: the law that expresses that tradition (definitions, the law, rights and obligations) – The Constitution: the constitution proper, that describes the function of every institution political, social, and familial. It’s possible each country(kingdom), or federation(empire) might want to modify these as they see fit. – The Acts: Actions that are specific to the american experiment. Every country or group of countries would replace these and add their own acts – The Restitutions: the “restitutions and punishments for crimes against our people”: Every country would replace and add their own restitutions and punishments.
-
RULE OF LAW’S CHAIN OF COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES
RULE OF LAW’S CHAIN OF COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES https://propertarianism.com/2020/03/03/rule-of-laws-chain-of-cognitive-consequences/
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-03 13:44:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234836960327405568
-
RULE OF LAW’S CHAIN OF COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES
by James Dmitro Makienko [R]ule of law fixes all male-cognitives (regardless of the present level of their civilization or their background). Which enables them to fix female-cognitives through patriarchy. By giving them a framework to direct their female cognition toward raising children, stay faithful to their husbands and keeping a family unit and healthy community (gives male-cognitives something worthy of defending, fighting and if necessary dying for). This is why traditional religion can work as this framework – as it gives female cognitives a weekly ritual with someone continuously telling them how to behave (like an orthodox priest – the one in my church actually loves studying aristotle and plato, you can have a good philosophy discussion with him after service). As long as male-cognitives keep a close watch over the weekly ritual to ensure it is not used for undermining of commons by female-cognitives, and law, logic and reason remain superior. === 1) James is very talented, developing fast, and this is great stuff. 2) I am increasingly convinced that Orthodoxy works precisely because it didn’t try to fake a bridge. It’s like: … i) Orthodox = God, without interference in the state. … ii) Catholicsm = Churchanity: god and jesus plus interference in the state. … iii) Evangelical=Jesus and ignoring the state. … iv) Secular Christians = Ritual Loyalty to Christians and maybe ‘deism’
-
RULE OF LAW’S CHAIN OF COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES
by James Dmitro Makienko [R]ule of law fixes all male-cognitives (regardless of the present level of their civilization or their background). Which enables them to fix female-cognitives through patriarchy. By giving them a framework to direct their female cognition toward raising children, stay faithful to their husbands and keeping a family unit and healthy community (gives male-cognitives something worthy of defending, fighting and if necessary dying for). This is why traditional religion can work as this framework – as it gives female cognitives a weekly ritual with someone continuously telling them how to behave (like an orthodox priest – the one in my church actually loves studying aristotle and plato, you can have a good philosophy discussion with him after service). As long as male-cognitives keep a close watch over the weekly ritual to ensure it is not used for undermining of commons by female-cognitives, and law, logic and reason remain superior. === 1) James is very talented, developing fast, and this is great stuff. 2) I am increasingly convinced that Orthodoxy works precisely because it didn’t try to fake a bridge. It’s like: … i) Orthodox = God, without interference in the state. … ii) Catholicsm = Churchanity: god and jesus plus interference in the state. … iii) Evangelical=Jesus and ignoring the state. … iv) Secular Christians = Ritual Loyalty to Christians and maybe ‘deism’