Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • EITHER WAY WE HAVE TO OUTLAW SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION BY FALSE PROMISE (worth repeati

    EITHER WAY WE HAVE TO OUTLAW SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION BY FALSE PROMISE

    (worth repeating)

    —So if (((the))) war on western-sensemaking: our realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, testimony, commons, and eugenics, is a continuation of their ancient world rebellion against the masculine empires, and an involuntary rebellion against evolution-eugenics.

    This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.

    Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:28:00 UTC

  • Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use

    Which is the purpose of my work on the law: to end the repeatedly successful use of abrahamic technique at destroying civilizations from within by false promise, baiting into hazard, selling to vulnerable women and the underclasses, and reversing east and west eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-21 12:03:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568559953338369

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1252568114656677889


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthRespecter @JonHaidt @berggruenInst This means if it’s genetic, as it is in our women,it’s irreparable, and separation is the only possibility. If it’s purely cultural (doesn’t appear to be) then it’s a matter of separating from their culture. Either way we have to outlaw it by requiring truthful reciprocal speech.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1252568114656677889

  • Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. T

    Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. The female intuition doesn’t scale. We have institutions and rule of law of tort for a reason – it scales, at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, keeping natural selection.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:57:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251615773195411457

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @berggruenInst

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251476099743338496

  • You are trying desperately Jonathan, but while you discovered the description of

    You are trying desperately Jonathan, but while you discovered the description of the problem, you haven’t discovered we already had the optimum in european rule of law, monarch as a judge of last resort, parliament, property qual., under one family one vote: market eugenics.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-18 20:55:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251615430432772098

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1251504086001823744

  • I mean truth-before-face, rule of law, jury and testimony, independent judiciary

    I mean truth-before-face, rule of law, jury and testimony, independent judiciary, science, medicine, industry, and technology you pimple-dicked sheep beg, borrow and steal from us. … We did more in 400 years in the ancient world and 400 years in the modern than you did in 3000.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 14:46:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250435267086839809

    Reply addressees: @healingbyhenry @sunkiisss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250420702995308547

  • I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders, the british constitution,

    I’m a revolutionary. In the tradition of the founders, the british constitution, the common law, the european development of rule of law of common law, the germanic law, and the western indo european law of the ancients and their predecessors.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 13:33:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250417079200735233

    Reply addressees: @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250416077844119553


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @readomain @MattPirkowski @ThruTheHayes Here, in the USA, taking care of an ailing parent rather than putting her in a home, he shows up to fight in virginia, educates others one how our civilization was undermined, writes a reformation of the constitution to restore and preserve it, works within the law – until then.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1250416077844119553

  • BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND

    BUT I’M NOT CREATING A POPULAR POLITICAL MOVEMENT I’M CREATING A REVOLUTION AND A BODY OF LAW

    (and frankly y’all got nobody else at all other than me with anything to offer.)

    —“Curt: Don’t you realize that what you are trying to do is start a political movement? P must be a political movement if it’s ever going to get off the ground. You can talk all you want about it being the final conclusion to logic and science. You know what? That and $4 will get you a cup from Starbucks. I would personally like to see some P principles in our constitution. But it ain’t gonna happen if you don’t build constituencies. And the number one group that could be in your corner is conservative Christians. But that isn’t going to happen because you are too dogmatic about the folly of Christianity. I am offering you some advice. Delete all negative references to Christianity in your writings. Stop telling Christians they are foolish, failures, weak, arrogant, disobedient and wasting their time believing in the fake man in the sky. You are trying to build a political movement (herd) whether you choose to admit it or not. Who is going to be followers of the P movement? Marxists? Socialists? Antifa? The leftist academic elitists? The deep state? The parasitic democrats dependent on government transfer payments, single mothers, millions of recent immigrants, the AOC & Bernie millennials? No. It’s Euro Americans of which a huge number are Christian. And you’re going to piss them off. You are NOT going to gain any traction by alienating what should be your core constituency. You can be self-righteous in your P dogma and lose. Or you can try to win by forging alliances with those who can help you move forward. Choose wisely.”— Herod Bedford

    Go to my twitter page. What does the pinned tweet say?

    Here. I’m going to post it below for you.

    My response is that instead you stop making excuses for the truth in order to burying your head in the sand using faith as an excuse. You can never have a theocracy. You can only have trifunctionalism, or you can disappear from this earth.

    Truth and Law vs Wisdom and Faith.

    I’m not looking for a majority, any more than were the founders. I’m looking for 1% or less of the population that will fight to restore the constitution and our civilization without pandering to anyone, whether christian, or fascist, or marxist-socialist-postmodernist-feminist, or anything in between – we are made from rule of law and christianity, fascism, liberalism, and leftism are all privileged cults of fantasy that are possible because the few – the very few – were willing to pick up, carry arms, sally forth, and fight to preserve them despite cowards like you.

    Either your civilization and its operating system of law comes first, or you are an enemy of our people. If your faith is before your people, or you are the enemy of our people. if it comes before our law, our people, and our civilization then you are the enemy of your people. Your privilege of faith is due to our civilization, and our law, and the truth within our law that you deny in order to maintain your faith.

    Christian self congratulatory delusions are only possible, as is judaism, because real men fight for the law to have the freedom to provide you with that self indulgence.

    The few strong, reciprocal, and brave, do not need the approval of the many weak, irreciprocal, and cowardly.

    So grow up, man up, shut up, and fight for our law.

    Because the survival of your faith is predicated on it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-15 10:11:00 UTC

  • Which is what I do. I update the written constitution of adams, jefferson, and t

    Which is what I do. I update the written constitution of adams, jefferson, and the founters, which was an update of the unwritten constitution of britain, which was an update of the unwritten law of anglo saxons, which was an update of the germanic common law.  … Rule of Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 21:29:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250174384049991684

    Reply addressees: @jim_rutt @_Indirection

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250170009885855745

  • enumerate those rights and define sufficient food, and enumerate what they are r

    enumerate those rights and define sufficient food, and enumerate what they are required to do in exchange and you have a constitution. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:53:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250089699819094016

    Reply addressees: @eruditenights

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249776466365009927

  • NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE. In this constitution, all rights and obligations un

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/OUR NEW CONSTITUTION ON DEFENSE.

    In this constitution, all rights and obligations under all conditions are enumerated in “Article III – Rights and Obligations” – and it is this article and it’s structure that improves upon the bill of rights by organizing and consolidating rights so that they are all but impossible to violate. The failure to enumerate rights using this formal structure is why they were so easy to circumvent.

    The right and obligation for defense is under “Section IV – Reciprocity in Defense”.

    The primary work effort missing from this Article is the changes in rights and obligations under war or windfall. This will be an innovation in articulating the law where it hasn’t been articulated before. But that shouldn’t interfere with your discussion.

    https://propertarianism.com/revolution/constitution/rights-obligations/Updated Apr 13, 2020, 11:03 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-13 11:03:00 UTC