Jan 30, 2020, 10:11 PM We can, and do, falsify all human action in court. The question was, could we falsify all human speech in court. The answer is yes. The usual problem is that someone wants an ideology(political) philosophy (secular theological), or theology (supernatural theological) solution – which is impossible. Because Science (truthful testimony) is falsificationary. As far as I know, P is complete. And there are no false or ir-reciprocal statements that can survive its falsification. That fact that people can’t get their noggins around the fact that all science (testimony) like markets (competition) is falsificationary is a common problem. But it stems from a failure to understand that science is falsificationary, then demanding P, like philosophy, ideology, or religion be justificationary. It’s not. So they criticize P for not being a science on the one hand by false presumption science is justificationary, and then complain P isn’t justificationary. Kind of silly really, but you can see where they get it from. Most people are stuck in the error of “Mathiness” because they don’t grasp the constitution of, or limits of, mathematics. Math breaks down in all three directions: the very small, the very large, and the very-human (cognitive): economics. If you need a positive theology, philosophy, ideology, sophism, or pseudoscience, then I understand the via-positiva is necessary for simple minds. But grownups are not afraid of via-negativa (skepticism), because we know all non trivial non tautological propositions are contingent, because we may always or nearly always, discover some novel parsimony that allows us to reorganize our paradigms for greater consistency, correspondence, coherence, completeness and parsimony than before. Edit
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 15:29:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264941618647490563
-
The Enemy Will Be Powerless
Jan 31, 2020, 1:38 PM The enemy will be powerless if we get the constitution through, because it incrementally increase the scope of the law to prohibit every single means by which undermining and baiting into hazard is produced. By radically reforming the financial sector, all those trillions will go into the public coffers every year, and ur people will be out of debt slavery. By radically reforming the university we will have far fewer people getting into household levesls of reproductively preventative debt.
-
The Enemy Will Be Powerless
Jan 31, 2020, 1:38 PM The enemy will be powerless if we get the constitution through, because it incrementally increase the scope of the law to prohibit every single means by which undermining and baiting into hazard is produced. By radically reforming the financial sector, all those trillions will go into the public coffers every year, and ur people will be out of debt slavery. By radically reforming the university we will have far fewer people getting into household levesls of reproductively preventative debt.
-
The Trooper
BACKGROUND: The driver had been ‘stalking’ the Trooper while in pursuit of a speeding car. This put the Trooper in a position of being threatened. When stopped,the driver antagonized the officer. Single Troopers are dependent upon our submission to investigation for their safety. The Trooper verbally escalated so that he did not have to Physically escalate to violence in order to force the driver into submitting to investigation, or to throw the driver ‘into the system’ for failing to submit to investigation. Other countries use groups of police at all times but they are smaller countries with more dense population with fewer drivers, because those countries were not organized for cars like the USA. So either triple the cost of officers or submit to investigation to keep costs down. WHAT”S THE PROBLEM 1) educate the public (a) the police’s role in identifying risky behavior (insurer), and enforcing violations, and intervening in crimes, and resolving disputes, (b) in the citizen’s responsibilities when ‘pulled over’ or ‘questioned’. 2) explain to the public how the officers need to react in each case: (a)instruct to investigate, (b) command if necessary, (c) verbally escalate if necessary, (d) physically escalate if necessary (e) escalate to deadly force of necessary. 3) train officers to ensure that they can only escalate in response not initiate escalation, and that their primary function is (a) obtain control of the environment, and (b) de-escalation (c) investigation in that order. And that escalation is only necessary if they can’t get control of the environment. 4) explain to the public how cops and citizens are human beings, who don’t know each other, thrown into conflict. Be forgiving of one another. Most of what I find when investigating is simply not getting the training I got as a child by the police in how to interact with police and what police were trying to do and why. Explaining incentives is all that’s necessary for ordinary human beings. Most ‘bad’ police behavior is due to initiating the accusatory method ithat causes the citizen to escalate his behavior. Rather than just asking for his or her side of the story. And it’s this ‘cheap’ way of agitating the citizen so that he can put the citizen into the system, rather than de-escalate the situation. In other words, police are habituating the strategy of ‘don’t make me come here or you’ll be in the system’ rather than “I’m here to de-escalate conflict in the citizenry, to reduce your risky behavior, or to intervene in criminal behavior”.
-
The Trooper
BACKGROUND: The driver had been ‘stalking’ the Trooper while in pursuit of a speeding car. This put the Trooper in a position of being threatened. When stopped,the driver antagonized the officer. Single Troopers are dependent upon our submission to investigation for their safety. The Trooper verbally escalated so that he did not have to Physically escalate to violence in order to force the driver into submitting to investigation, or to throw the driver ‘into the system’ for failing to submit to investigation. Other countries use groups of police at all times but they are smaller countries with more dense population with fewer drivers, because those countries were not organized for cars like the USA. So either triple the cost of officers or submit to investigation to keep costs down. WHAT”S THE PROBLEM 1) educate the public (a) the police’s role in identifying risky behavior (insurer), and enforcing violations, and intervening in crimes, and resolving disputes, (b) in the citizen’s responsibilities when ‘pulled over’ or ‘questioned’. 2) explain to the public how the officers need to react in each case: (a)instruct to investigate, (b) command if necessary, (c) verbally escalate if necessary, (d) physically escalate if necessary (e) escalate to deadly force of necessary. 3) train officers to ensure that they can only escalate in response not initiate escalation, and that their primary function is (a) obtain control of the environment, and (b) de-escalation (c) investigation in that order. And that escalation is only necessary if they can’t get control of the environment. 4) explain to the public how cops and citizens are human beings, who don’t know each other, thrown into conflict. Be forgiving of one another. Most of what I find when investigating is simply not getting the training I got as a child by the police in how to interact with police and what police were trying to do and why. Explaining incentives is all that’s necessary for ordinary human beings. Most ‘bad’ police behavior is due to initiating the accusatory method ithat causes the citizen to escalate his behavior. Rather than just asking for his or her side of the story. And it’s this ‘cheap’ way of agitating the citizen so that he can put the citizen into the system, rather than de-escalate the situation. In other words, police are habituating the strategy of ‘don’t make me come here or you’ll be in the system’ rather than “I’m here to de-escalate conflict in the citizenry, to reduce your risky behavior, or to intervene in criminal behavior”.
-
The Anglo Peoples Need …
The Anglo Peoples Need … https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/the-anglo-peoples-need/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 23:07:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264694575261782018
-
The Anglo Peoples Need …
Feb 1, 2020, 7:06 PM THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY by Reece Haynes 5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people. And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary. Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes. And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.
CD: The judicial novelties I’ve found are:
The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.
The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.
The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.
The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.
The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.
The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.
the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time
The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.
The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.
The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.
The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.
The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.
Universal standing in matters of the commons
Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.
The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.
Edit
-
The Anglo Peoples Need …
Feb 1, 2020, 7:06 PM THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY by Reece Haynes 5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people. And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary. Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes. And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.
CD: The judicial novelties I’ve found are:
The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.
The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.
The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.
The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.
The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.
The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.
the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time
The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.
The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.
The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.
The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.
The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.
Universal standing in matters of the commons
Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.
The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.
Edit
-
What It Says Right There in Text…
What It Says Right There in Text… https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/what-it-says-right-there-in-text/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 23:06:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264694227793063940