Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • The Consistency of Laws

    Feb 20, 2020, 8:21 PM

    If Natural Law, Physical Law and Gods Law are the same then yes, morals come from God. If morals are not the same as natural and physical law then men have erred in interpreting gods or nature’s law.

    I prefer christians, especially devoted christians over all other people – and the evidentiary reality is christianity ‘works’ to produce better people than all other religions and better than every secular alternative. I just prefer to maintain the separation between law(Truth) and faith(Wisdom) and so theology must defend wisdom claims (the good) not truth claims (the true or false).

    –“​I thought doolittle was anti religion”– Nathan Danner —“​I’m not sure his religious views. These two are bringing religion into propertarianism whether Kurt intended it to be there or not.”—Nate

    I have a job and I do my job. My job is to protect my people from the left’s lies, and another dark age – and part of that job is to discover a way to restore a religion to ‘the religion of the state’. I know it is hard for the faithful to tolerate my work on religion. It’s certainly hard on me. And I request only that while I work on law others work on faith, and hopefully I will someday discover a means of uniting them.

  • The Consistency of Laws

    Feb 20, 2020, 8:21 PM

    If Natural Law, Physical Law and Gods Law are the same then yes, morals come from God. If morals are not the same as natural and physical law then men have erred in interpreting gods or nature’s law.

    I prefer christians, especially devoted christians over all other people – and the evidentiary reality is christianity ‘works’ to produce better people than all other religions and better than every secular alternative. I just prefer to maintain the separation between law(Truth) and faith(Wisdom) and so theology must defend wisdom claims (the good) not truth claims (the true or false).

    –“​I thought doolittle was anti religion”– Nathan Danner —“​I’m not sure his religious views. These two are bringing religion into propertarianism whether Kurt intended it to be there or not.”—Nate

    I have a job and I do my job. My job is to protect my people from the left’s lies, and another dark age – and part of that job is to discover a way to restore a religion to ‘the religion of the state’. I know it is hard for the faithful to tolerate my work on religion. It’s certainly hard on me. And I request only that while I work on law others work on faith, and hopefully I will someday discover a means of uniting them.

  • Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not

    Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not need saving from you (us).

  • Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not

    Constitutions don’t save you (us). They explain the terms by which others do not need saving from you (us).

  • Possibilities Under the Law

    Possibilities Under the Law https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/possibilities-under-the-law/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 22:41:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266499899681636353

  • Possibilities Under the Law

    One cannot legislate belief (thought) One cannot legislate unbelief (thought) One can legislate public speech (display, word, and deed) One can legislate proselytizing (sale and distribution) One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)

  • Possibilities Under the Law

    One cannot legislate belief (thought) One cannot legislate unbelief (thought) One can legislate public speech (display, word, and deed) One can legislate proselytizing (sale and distribution) One can legislate against organized crime (undermining, social construction, addiction)

  • Ignorance by Design

    Ignorance by Design https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/ignorance-by-design/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 22:40:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266499566834155520

  • This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law

    This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/this-century-will-have-to-contend-with-doolittle-on-the-law/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 22:35:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266498534754283520

  • This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law

    Statements are true, or they are not. They are desirable, or they are not. Whether they are desirable or not, has no bearing on whether they are true or not.

    But, disapproving of, denying, or obscuring the true whether desirable or not, says far more about your character, ethics, morals, and mind than stating the true whether it is desirable or not. 😉 This century will have to contend with Doolittle on the law, testimony and the demarcation between testifiable science and not – he completed transitioning the law’s into a science and operational logic – whether it is desirable or not. Just how it is.