When someone other than Scalia (god rest his soul) tries to argue with me about the law.
“Is there no one else?!!”
Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 20:35:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330973224918786049
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
When someone other than Scalia (god rest his soul) tries to argue with me about
-
You will have a problem understanding me because I teach formal logic of juridic
You will have a problem understanding me because I teach formal logic of juridical science. I do not teach contemporary proceduralism, which consists of legal pseudoscience operating under the sophistry of positive law – in violation of 5000 years of european (eugenic) tradition.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 20:32:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330972598356893701
Reply addressees: @lawconflicts @josephfcox
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330970171209605122
-
A crime is a violation of demonstrated interests that is ensured by the state.A
A crime is a violation of demonstrated interests that is ensured by the state.A tort is a crime of demonstrated interset the resolution of which is insured by the state.The variation between polities is the demarcation between the scope of demonstrated interests insured each way.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 20:30:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330972094151200769
Reply addressees: @lawconflicts @josephfcox
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330970171209605122
-
It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW. There is only one law pos
It’s not a question of think. It’s a question of KNOW.
There is only one law possible, that is tort (trespass). All else is either contract under it, agent contract (legislation) under it, or edict of general case (edict) or edict of a specific case (regulation) outside of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 20:26:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330970881011625985
Reply addressees: @lawconflicts @josephfcox
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330969709651652611
-
This ancient Law was undermined by the enlightenment dispute over free speech. a
This ancient Law was undermined by the enlightenment dispute over free speech. at some point free speech and tolerance for it, overtook the limiting of free speech to the truthful and political. It spread into business (snake oil) then into politics, and then into public speech. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1330959554897727495
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 19:42:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330959995081527296
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1330959554897727495
-
The Left’s technique(Crime) which we call doxing is a violation of our tradition
The Left’s technique(Crime) which we call doxing is a violation of our traditional law wherein we are limited to the two markets: the via negativa of the court, or the via positiva of the market – and prohibited from interference in reputation(defamation), business, or marriage.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 19:41:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330959554897727495
-
Historically polities, states, federations, and empires have excluded certain gr
Historically polities, states, federations, and empires have excluded certain groups from government, from occupations, from property ownership, and even increased taxes on them because of the higher cost of policing them.
Ex: Imposing ‘silence’ prohibiting their public speech.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-23 18:07:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330936096553902082
-
Wrong interpretation. Convert blue cities into free city states, drop the house,
Wrong interpretation. Convert blue cities into free city states, drop the house, convert senate to governors, who hire a professional prime minister and cabinet. Devolve all but treasury, insurer, court, defense to the states, limit federal to trade, defense, insurance. HRE v2.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-22 23:33:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330655600657788935
Reply addressees: @after_theaction @HbdNrx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330652819528032257
-
Well, under rule of law we need a mechanism for non-arbitrarily prosecuting fals
Well, under rule of law we need a mechanism for non-arbitrarily prosecuting falsehoods, false promises, sedition, and treason. P-Law gives us non-arbitrary formal criteria and law. Why? Our civ is just Science all the way down. It’s not open to opinion, relativism, or exceptions. https://twitter.com/William68332190/status/1330570847166361600
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-22 18:04:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330572927914438658
https://twitter.com/William68332190/status/1330570847166361600
-
Under P-Law propaganda is an act of war. Falsehoods, False promise (fraud), Defa
Under P-Law propaganda is an act of war. Falsehoods, False promise (fraud), Defamation, Conspiracy, Sedition, and Treason are testable propositions and there is no room for ‘wiggling’ out of it.
P-Law is pretty fascist – if you’re a criminal. 😉 It’s inspiring if you’re normal.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-22 17:26:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1330563308454367235