The best way is to enact laws
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 16:43:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355919631005995009
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355915009675689992
The best way is to enact laws
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 16:43:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355919631005995009
Reply addressees: @EPoe187
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355915009675689992
You will look terrifying in robes – especially if you’re carrying a book of the law in one hand, and an axe instead of a gavel in the other. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 00:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355681251059970048
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355680844355162113
Rule of Law:
…..Moral Markets -> Mixed Economy <- Moral Govt.
….Private Property —> Commons <—– Resources
Arbitrary Rule:
……….Capitalism <——————> Marxism
No Common Property <——-> No Private Property
Rent Seeking <— Black Markets —> Corruption
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 21:53:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355635371376259075
I WANT TO RESTORE AND COMPLETE THE CONSTITUTION – AS SCIENCE
CAUTION: My work tries to RESTORE the constitution to its intentions of an alliance of states under a weak federation, in the thousand-year history of the holy roman empire, an the successful Germanic and English model of a rule of law of the natural common law, an independent judiciary, and houses of government as a market for commons.
What I do is legal in the United States. (for now). What’s illegal is planning, organizing, and committing crimes. I have a long-standing policy of separating activism from action. And I have a long-standing policy of stating that we only act as one, not as individuals or small groups. It’s counter-productive.
The only way to avoid violence is to organize on a scale that the chance of violence by either side is untenable for both sides. So if you have ‘designs’ that conflict with this strategy, then do not contact me regarding it. I don’t want to know. And I consider it harmful. Ok?
When we DO ask you to show up, DO show up. And show up ready to play Gandhi until we have no choice but to go viking.
That is the only path to the moral high ground. There is NO OTHER PATH no matter how horrific you see the present injustices, crimes, and war of genocide against our people.
The way we win is to demand the same protections for political identity as we do for religious, racial, and sex identity – and to have an honest discussion over the future and policies – and to go our own ways.
Until we can’t do that because they have demonstrated their criminality in open discourse.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 19:06:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105646234860089390
Drama queen. He’s thinking long term. Without the filibuster, the Senate is done. (a) Senate never should have been converted to directly elected instead of state appointed, and (b) always should have required 2/3 vote. The senate’s function is to prevent the folly of the people.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-29 22:54:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355288131059249162
Reply addressees: @drvolts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355250062222262273
And as I have said since the beginning, my project is to produce that ‘bible’, and embed it in a constitution and use the natural incentives of markets to exterminate competition. This is possible b/c European civ (alone) fully reflects the formal, physical, natural, & evo laws.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 15:33:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354452533889159171
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354452130392907777
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthQuest11 As I have said since the beginning, (a) absence of our own ‘bible’ of western civ(Law) (b) tolerance for thought-competition under self-determination and trifunctionalism (c) roman failure to exterminate supernatural christianity (d) remnants superstition, (e) make us vulnerable.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1354452130392907777
As I have said since the beginning, (a) absence of our own ‘bible’ of western civ(Law) (b) tolerance for thought-competition under self-determination and trifunctionalism (c) roman failure to exterminate supernatural christianity (d) remnants superstition, (e) make us vulnerable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 15:32:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354452130392907777
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354451524907388932
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TruthQuest11 The objective of marxism was underclass (labor) rule by revolutionary overthrow of meritocracy. Lenin understood this must be done by gaining political power. Then by violence against meritocratic peoples. When the underclass failed, Gramsci demanded the destruction of culture.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1354451524907388932
Well done. 😉
That said, the difference is that incentives cause people to move themselves. 😉 Law is the means of human operation at scale, and human engineering by consequence. Not because I wish it so but because that is the evidence. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 02:37:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353894685593497600
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @FedorLives @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353891131378069505
That part of the conversation is either unstated or talking past me. The net is, as a judgment of law, the question is one of volition, not one of reciprocity or testimony.
Not my job. Or the court’s. Politics is for you folks.
You choose. You pay the price or reap the rewards.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 02:13:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353888755615215617
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @FedorLives @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353881710761488384
OK but these are socio-political questions not genetic and evolutionary questions. I know my job. 😉 I do law: true, necessary, contingent, impossible, and undecidable. This isn’t then a question of science but of politics – not a question of Law(reciprocity testifiability).
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 02:11:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353888136737263618
Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @FedorLives @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353882528298500097