RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @scottdomianus Law is via-negativa. But it’s signals are not limited to the negative.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-29 00:21:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1443007936306061312
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @scottdomianus Law is via-negativa. But it’s signals are not limited to the negative.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-29 00:21:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1443007936306061312
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @scottdomianus I think this would suggest that Law signals the benefits of reciprocity to the submargin…
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-29 00:20:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1443007647658164229
Why was the pre-war british model + the P-constitution the optimum political model? https://t.co/0O86RHDnNk

Source date (UTC): 2021-09-28 17:38:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1442906691146633218
Clip: All that matters is the constitution
https://youtu.be/_NUlytHKidE
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-27 20:58:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1442594571372933123
17% of burglaries, arsons, and car thefts are cleared.
45% of violent crimes lead to arrest and prosecution.
Among violent crimes?
.. 61% of homicides (Though 70% of those prosecutions lead to a conviction.)
.. 53% of aggravated assault
.. 34% of rape.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-26 20:02:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1442217936387645443
I am (we are) hoping to do so, yes. And I agree with you. But then, as I’ve stated elsewhere, they are able to weasel and waffle and ‘pilpul’ because of the holes left in the constitution by the founders who did not fully incorporate blackstone into the constitution.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-22 23:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440823419797340161
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440822926794625027
Ok, so you’re right here.
Should be warrantied and liable as warrantable and reversible or restitutable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 18:28:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440019996617359361
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439964915805130752
The point is that we need a checklist that can be used in court, and that we cannot leave open the necessity of ‘correct’ deduction where it creates a ‘hole’ for misinterpretation (abuse).
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 14:55:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439966575449321481
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439965888128684035
It’s called evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 14:52:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439965745165836297
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439965256042745863
Just my first draft of it all as one statement. But you can claim you warranty something that is not possible to warranty, and claim liability for something that you cannot pay restitution for. So it should be restitutable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 14:51:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439965561325334535
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439964915805130752