You mean moralize vs legalize…. sure.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 14:02:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446838439421300746
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446806243151073280
You mean moralize vs legalize…. sure.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 14:02:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446838439421300746
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446806243151073280
This isn’t worth my time. I stay out of the vaxx discussion on purpose because the science is not clear enough to make a judicial argument. Ergo the problem is choice. The herd people are afraid of those who choose differently. Violates social proof. You can’t change them.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-09 03:32:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446679904343445506
Reply addressees: @hoeberian @VeritateIn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446679531167825927
You mean like the constitution and bill of rights?
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 02:34:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446303004437753871
Reply addressees: @BDud70450648
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446301733601390615
Clearly you havent read the federalist papers.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:57:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446293567106846720
Reply addressees: @BDud70450648 @ChrisTh95851422 @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446290616602738689
False equivalency. If a law orders you to operate an extermination camp are you required by law to do so? If you are prosecuted for not doing so is that just?
You confuse command with law. Law requires legitimacy. What determines legitimacy? In your argument it’s force.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:48:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446291341261123595
Reply addressees: @BDud70450648 @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446272723144134657
RT @curtdoolittle: @ChrisTh95851422 @woodruffbets We don’t live in a democracy. We live in a constitutional republic under the common law,uā¦
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:40:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446289388590272516
We don’t live in a democracy. We live in a constitutional republic under the common law,using three layers of democratic processes to elect representatives: the house for property owners, the senate for the states, and the electoral college for the president:To PREVENT democracy.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:40:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446289368180830225
Reply addressees: @ChrisTh95851422 @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446286663999791106
If I had been there on the 6th as requested I would have issued demands from the chamber floor, for the restoration of equal protection under the law, and the restoration of common law interference in family and business. It would’ve been a very different outcome.
Bad organizing.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:06:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446280929513721856
Reply addressees: @WriteLinesInk @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446280075423354902
Or easier. What was Scalia trying to accomplish in his reform of judicial interpretation?
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:02:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446279892639825922
Reply addressees: @OrganLawOffices @SCR1124 @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446279329583935488
Let’s dance.
What kind of law do you practice?
What reforms are necessary at the constitutional level to improve juridical consistency?
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-08 01:02:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446279713333383175
Reply addressees: @OrganLawOffices @SCR1124 @woodruffbets
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1446279329583935488