(NLI – Important)
Something I should articulate explicitly. It might be more important and I haven’t addressed it directly of late: There is a difference between public speech and public suggestion. The first is reciprocal and transparent, the second is irreciprocal and…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 20:41:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881441943290589301
The USA is a Republic. And yes it is not a democracy. And that’s a GOOD thing. And as far as I know the form of government between oligarchy and democracy is republic (rule of law, natural law, aristocratic representatives, with the minority of demonstrably responsible citizens…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 19:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881417509724909574
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881409619446423652
Wikipedia: The word “patriation” was invented in Canada as a back-formation from “repatriation” (returning to one’s country). As the Canadian constitution was originally a British law, it could not “return to” Canada.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-20 15:34:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881364711897452688
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881332879256617284
TONY. THAT’S FALSE. The Executive branch is responsible for enforcement. It is within reasonable judgement to attempt to satisfy the public demand AND protect our national security, and public from manipulation and propaganda by proposing a means of Patriating TikTok for the benefit of it’s small business and consumer users, just as we are Repatriating all strategic industries worldwide.
The deal Trump is proposing is in line with our Institute’s recommendations for increases in public-private ventures so that the insurance the USG provides as insurer of last resort in these cases can reduce the tax burden on the people of the United States through generation of shared income rather than pure irresponsible tax extraction.
Reply addressees: @Scaramucci
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-19 23:54:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881128199939309568
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1881051319458550232
Evasion of responsibility for defense of the private and common. So ‘looking the other way’ is yes, hard to measure. Lawfare to undermine it is however very easy to measure, which is why we have to outlaw it.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-17 19:50:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880341856783069361
Reply addressees: @Father_Speaking
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1880334635676418195
Probably not, without separating the houses as one of the remedies we’ve suggested.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-16 16:49:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879933921032544664
Reply addressees: @WalterIII @AutistocratMS @LukeWeinhagen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879933396039979132
I don’t see it as our enemy – the constitution and government design is phenomenal. I see enemies (the left) occupying our institutions. So the constitution is weak in defense against these enemies.
As such I suspect I understand government as institutions, rules, and procedures, and you see it as people. I see the problem as replacing people and preventing their influence just as we do all other crime.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @LukeWeinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-16 16:37:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879930925305495552
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879929685179773026
RT @mopeng: Sweden is preparing to change the constitution to be able to take away the passports of people who obtained citizenship fraudul…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-15 14:46:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1879540592159658280
Sorry, I should have also answered your question directly: Eminent domain is an ingroup decision and conquest is an outgroup decision. Morality is an ingroup necessity but only an outgroup utility. In other words, universalism is a product of religion – not states.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-09 14:20:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1877359839636078985
Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1877229920914473004
RT @NSDarkHorse: @truckdriverpleb Canadians need a robust US style Constitution, not the watered down “bill of rights” that can be easily t…
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-08 19:54:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1877081421891682665