RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle We can’t make enough of us without the Law.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-10 18:32:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579540269472808960
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
Law is either scientific, or it’s not. If it’s not scientific, it’s not law. If
Law is either scientific, or it’s not. If it’s not scientific, it’s not law. If it’s not law, then it’s either command, error, deceit, fraud, sedition, or treason
The positive law revolution of Bentham, Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin, and Rawls, is a fraud for the purpose of sedition.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-10 16:29:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579509484518416389
-
The reason you want a rule-of-law, of the natural law, constitutional, monarchy,
The reason you want a rule-of-law, of the natural law, constitutional, monarchy, is that they are above the law in the restoration of the law, but have no power otherwise other than assent or veto. This is, surprisingly, the optimum end point of the checks and balances on power.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 20:54:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579213795372961792
-
b/c the common law of tort is the empirical record of our discovery of the tests
b/c the common law of tort is the empirical record of our discovery of the tests of the natural law of cooperation, that results in the division of labor, that in turn results in our prosperity, by returns on time, then we should be taught the common law as logic of morality.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 23:33:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578891440683294720
Reply addressees: @Max_Stoic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578701751506681857
-
The reality is that the Decidability necessary to produce Judicial Neutrality is
The reality is that the Decidability necessary to produce Judicial Neutrality is possible, and I work on it (and solved it). So as a result I’m anti-false-narrative, sex-ist, class-ist, culture-ist, and civilization-ist: because those are the origins of our false narratives. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1578889004660903936
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 23:26:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578889663716425728
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1578889004660903936
-
“The most recent wave of law and economics, began with Ronald Coase’s 1960 artic
-“The most recent wave of law and economics, began with Ronald Coase’s 1960 article “The Problem of Social Cost”- the most cited article in legal scholarship. It gained its reputation among legal academicians with the publication of Richard Posner’s Economic Analysis of Law.”-
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-06 12:42:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578002812205662209
-
THere is no value in multi-polarity between rule of law, despotism, and imperial
THere is no value in multi-polarity between rule of law, despotism, and imperialism. Federations are multi-polar (competitive) in that they offer differen solutoins. But they are incapable of FORCING different solutions.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-06 11:46:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577988596883230722
Reply addressees: @Gidikim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577984096038522880
-
No. Democracy doesn’t matter. Rule of law does. For rule of law to work, the wor
No. Democracy doesn’t matter. Rule of law does. For rule of law to work, the world badly needs to destroy both woke, and RU, CN, IR, imperialism.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-06 11:44:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577988076877627393
Reply addressees: @Gidikim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577984379342790656
-
So we have Kagan, Sotomayor and now Brown that are unfit for the #SupremeCourt.
So we have Kagan, Sotomayor and now Brown that are unfit for the #SupremeCourt. At least with Ginsburg, Oconnor, and Breyer, they were just wrong. They weren’t intellectually incompetent.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 22:01:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577781007691956225
-
RT @TexasDonna12: @chuckwoolery She’s not qualified to be on the Supreme Court!
RT @TexasDonna12: @chuckwoolery She’s not qualified to be on the Supreme Court!
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-05 20:47:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1577762416397615105