We gave up on the spectrum of lost boys in 2020. Y’all are mentally unfit and unsalvageable. We just do the science the law and legal activism.
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-31 22:08:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1906830887322320903
Reply addressees: @ooana
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1906819427594621241
Difference between advising, judging, and ruling. The first two yes. THe last, I leave that to kings.
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-24 03:40:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904015539623936425
Reply addressees: @brodie369386032
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904010001049358484
Why do copyrights exist at all? They were invented for the purpose of taxation, not to capture a market for authors.
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-20 17:19:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1902772013963579769
Reply addressees: @ThatNeilMartin
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1902733220275167666
It’s not necessarily that the court is wrong in it’s own reasoning, but that it’s operating on false premises, and not taking into account the corruption.
Therefore the court errs.
Ergo the question is always the same “pointy objects”.
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-18 22:32:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1902126045391941804
Reply addressees: @extra_thousand @bennyjohnson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1902110877706604835
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE COURT CAN ONLY RULE
The will of the people determines enforcement.
Rulings can be followed or ignored. If ignored a…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-08 01:11:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1898179662507135037
RT @charliekirk11: Birthright Citizenship is court created lie. If you’re an illegal and have a baby on American soil, your child is not ma…
Source date (UTC): 2025-03-03 16:46:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1896603055636021639
(At NLI, we have done the work to produce this body of law.)
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-25 15:44:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1894413279726113168
Reply addressees: @COLONIZER_SUP
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1894280221701914673
SEE “holes in the constitution” https://x.com/search?q=%22holes%20in%20the%20constitution%22%20(from%3Acurtdoolittle))&src=typed_query&f=top
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-23 10:38:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1893611273482363311
Reply addressees: @Father_Speaking @smashbaals
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1893463194708123787
RT @ThruTheHayes: FREEDOM OF SPEECH
We require warranty on speech. Free speech was created so individuals could escalate grievances up a h…
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-18 07:40:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1891754618759090234
THE NEED FOR LAW AGAINST RENT SEEKING AND ITS JUSTIFICATION
Producer ←Distance→ Rent Seeker: it’s a sensory distance. In the positiva, we need instrumentation to sense what is beyond our sensory distances. In the negativa, we need instrumentation to distribute sense-perception sufficiently to identify the presence of rents. And that instrumentation consists of understanding of rent seeking, language to describe it, a reduction to a set of principles (tests, rules), the education or habituation necessary to distribute it, and a population with incentive to employ it. That instrumentation must be captured in language, reduced to law, and enabled by court and insured by the jury.
Source date (UTC): 2025-02-16 16:18:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1891160268874604544