Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • I ran the company, and the institute, and I was an advocate of rule of law and s

    I ran the company, and the institute, and I was an advocate of rule of law and stayed on message that the justice department was the impediment to curing their problems. “if you have Sheriffs or Militia and judges you can fix everything”. So some activists promoted me. And once I was on national TV for a long interview the first time it just kept rolling. The reason? An American with money who comes to UA to start a business is somehow more legitimate because it’s sort of evidence of the goodness of UA people and their promise. I think more important was that I didn’t charge money for judges to talk to me about reform. They had to buy me coffee πŸ˜‰ and I ended up spending about two or three hours a week with judges.

    This is why I know a great deal about the internals of Ukraine. Hanging with judges who WEREN’T corrupt. πŸ˜‰

    (Other stuff I could add but I won’t here in public.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 19:54:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633194471461474311

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633187143148519425

  • And Blackstone (no relation) wrote The Commentaries. πŸ˜‰

    And Blackstone (no relation) wrote The Commentaries. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 00:35:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632902850798911490

    Reply addressees: @ToddQuick8080 @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632898992790204417

  • That is false. I am pretty conficent I know the history of the common law back t

    That is false.
    I am pretty conficent I know the history of the common law back through it’s pre roman origins.
    – The defamations of libel and slander.
    – The oath
    – Military reporting.
    – The crime of perjury,

    Free speech was an EXCEPTION added to the constitution because they…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:46:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632799864412045313

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632797868196261889

  • LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE: (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, sta

    LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE:
    (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, states that your intention doesn’t matter. In a crime (a severe tort or trespass) your intention may matter or not.
    but;
    (b) The question is what shall we prohibit trespass against? What is the scope of our demonstrated interests?
    and;
    (c) Westerners alone, developed military reporting, testimonial (empirical) truth, and truth-before-face, in confession, commons, and court. Truth before face regardless of cost to self image, reputation, the competence or dominance hierarchy, is a DUTY. That duty is the reason the west developed jury, democracy (jury), thang and sentate debate (jury), and the reason, empiricism, and science, that almost alone dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, and poverty.
    And;
    (d) Truth before face is horoic, a contribution to the commons (a tax, sacrifice), and a status symbol for men, who demonstrate they are willing to risk conflict for the common good. But it is an risk for women and effeminate men, because they seek to avoid conflict at a cost to the common good. Ergo men ‘adult’ the sexes, ad women “infantilize” the sexes, in any and all matters of the commons. The cognitive difference between men and women is male systematizing over time seeking responsibiity and capital even by risk for status, vs female empathizing in time seeking evasion of responsibilty and capital accumulation in favor of huperconsumption at low risk. Hence female irresponsibility for the commons, hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
    But;
    (e) The introduction of women into the voting pool without either training women to avoid their evasion of responsibility for the commons, or placing a requrement for demonstrated competency in matters of the commons, opened teh door for postwar ‘feminization and infantilization’ of the institutional, political, economic, educational, social, familial, informational, and familial commons. Thereby destroying truth before face, realism, naturalism, empiricism, testimony, law, social norms and traditions, and the family as the first system of intergenerational production. And it’s unconsious, involuntary, instinct. And it resulted in the same as it has in every other past condition including the feminization of the french court, the christian destruction of the classical world, and the fall of spartans and their civilization.
    Therefore;
    (f) We must fight in war, we must forgoe crime, we must pay taxes, we must adhere to the natural law (law proper), and we must speak the truth before face regardless of cost, or we cannot have rule of law, jury, democracy, the high trust society, the economic, innovative, adaptive, evolutionary gains of the west that evolved faster than the rest whenever possible in the bronze (indo european), iron (mediterranean) and steel (atlantic) ages. And with that evolution we ended 2000 years of stagnation, poverty, disease and suffering, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming of ignorance, superstition poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
    Therefore;
    (g) the biological differences between classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races is as significant as the difference betwen the sexes. And for the same reasons: i) the degree of neotenic evolution of the race ii) the degree of genetic load in the classes iii) the asymmetry of classes between races and ethnicities iv) and the necessity of and the tendency for sexes, classes, ethnicities, civiliizations, and races to rely on kin preference and kin selection simply because they have more INTERESTS IN COMMON than those otherwise. As such given that the most scarce resource is cooperation, and that indifference between individuals and groups is a NECESSARY behavioral economy that cannot be evaded.
    (h) So this creates a conflict between the needs of our cooperation in particular commons, and the needs of our cooperation by general trade.
    ie: Separation is the only possible solution.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 16:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632785273774915585

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632747665321791488

  • LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE: (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, sta

    LET’S SCIENCE SCOTT’S ISSUE:
    (a) Tort, (or tresspass), the basis of all law, states that your intention doesn’t matter. In a crime (a severe tort or trespass) your intention may matter or not.
    but;
    (b) The question is what shall we prohibit trespass against? What is the scope of our demonstrated interests?
    and;
    (c) Westerners alone, developed military reporting, testimonial (empirical) truth, and truth-before-face, in confession, commons, and court. Truth before face regardless of cost to self image, reputation, the competence or dominance hierarchy, is a DUTY. That duty is the reason the west developed jury, democracy (jury), thang and sentate debate (jury), and the reason, empiricism, and science, that almost alone dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, and poverty.
    And;
    (d) Truth before face is horoic, a contribution to the commons (a tax, sacrifice), and a status symbol for men, who demonstrate they are willing to risk conflict for the common good. But it is an risk for women and effeminate men, because they seek to avoid conflict at a cost to the common good. Ergo men ‘adult’ the sexes, ad women “infantilize” the sexes, in any and all matters of the commons. The cognitive difference between men and women is male systematizing over time seeking responsibiity and capital even by risk for status, vs female empathizing in time seeking evasion of responsibilty and capital accumulation in favor of huperconsumption at low risk. Hence female irresponsibility for the commons, hyperconsumption, and hypergamy.
    But;
    (e) The introduction of women into the voting pool without either training women to avoid their evasion of responsibility for the commons, or placing a requrement for demonstrated competency in matters of the commons, opened teh door for postwar ‘feminization and infantilization’ of the institutional, political, economic, educational, social, familial, informational, and familial commons. Thereby destroying truth before face, realism, naturalism, empiricism, testimony, law, social norms and traditions, and the family as the first system of intergenerational production. And it’s unconsious, involuntary, instinct. And it resulted in the same as it has in every other past condition including the feminization of the french court, the christian destruction of the classical world, and the fall of spartans and their civilization.
    Therefore;
    (f) We must fight in war, we must forgoe crime, we must pay taxes, we must adhere to the natural law (law proper), and we must speak the truth before face regardless of cost, or we cannot have rule of law, jury, democracy, the high trust society, the economic, innovative, adaptive, evolutionary gains of the west that evolved faster than the rest whenever possible in the bronze (indo european), iron (mediterranean) and steel (atlantic) ages. And with that evolution we ended 2000 years of stagnation, poverty, disease and suffering, and dragged mankind kicking and screaming of ignorance, superstition poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death.
    Therefore;
    (g) the biological differences between classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races is as significant as the difference betwen the sexes. And for the same reasons: i) the degree of neotenic evolution of the race ii) the degree of genetic load in the classes iii) the asymmetry of classes between races and ethnicities iv) and the necessity of and the tendency for sexes, classes, ethnicities, civiliizations, and races to rely on kin preference and kin selection simply because they have more INTERESTS IN COMMON than those otherwise. As such given that the most scarce resource is cooperation, and that indifference between individuals and groups is a NECESSARY behavioral economy that cannot be evaded.
    (h) So this creates a conflict between the needs of our cooperation in particular commons, and the needs of our cooperation by general trade.
    ie: Separation is the only possible solution.
    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 16:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632785273389035526

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632747665321791488

  • RT @curtdoolittle: “Curt: Does the law protect us against canceling?” (a) Yes it

    RT @curtdoolittle: “Curt: Does the law protect us against canceling?”
    (a) Yes it did. And it needs to be re-established. (See attached text…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 14:21:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632748360535887880

  • ARTICLE IS CLICKBAIT TRUTH: The law demands bloggers who are paid to produce pol

    ARTICLE IS CLICKBAIT
    TRUTH: The law demands bloggers who are paid to produce political content disclose the payments.
    OPINION: The Libertarian in me says we shouldn’t care about the funding problem and if we do we can fix that. Judge of the Common Law in me says that it’s an extension of policy we already apply everywhere else so if we haven’t reversed previous legislation then this one is consistent?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 22:57:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631790953697615875

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631771785153720322

  • If every group is separate then the rule of law is the same for all, but each st

    If every group is separate then the rule of law is the same for all, but each state produces different policies.
    My whole point is separation into ‘a thousand nations’ allied militarily in federations, is the only way to give everyone what they need.
    I’m not sure how that’s not clear.

    Now, as y’all said today, it’s not clear that giving the left their own states isn’t abandoning responsibility for people who don’t know better. So is it immoral to suggest separation instead of conquest and domestication? In essence, separation is analogous to throwing the kids lost kids into a vast orphanage instead of finishing school, and letting them suffer.

    Maybe that’s the moral proposition instead.

    If it is, then I haven’t got there yet. Mostly because my understanding of genetics, is that you don’t want them in the gene pool because those genes are really really bad and might take hundreds of years to pacify.

    WHat I do know is that I want to do my work and I don’t want to put up with arrogant, opinionated, annoying, rude people that poison the well of discourse while I do it – regardless of what side they’re on. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 23:17:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631433538728783874

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631431389265395714

  • I’m not sure I feel secure in answering this question in public, lol. I wrote so

    I’m not sure I feel secure in answering this question in public, lol. I wrote something explanatory and deleted it for safety. though it’s not complicated. You draw the line at marginal difference. Describing marginal difference requires detail I don’t want to get into.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 20:18:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631026233075957763

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00 @FlashGorgone

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631020132742107141

  • (You are wrong. If you have monarchy be glad you do. The alternative is endless

    (You are wrong. If you have monarchy be glad you do. The alternative is endless political decay. Rule of law by the natural law, common law, and concurrency, requires the monarchy as a judge of last resort. And requires the aristocracy to set a standard that prevents degeneracy (though in the UK it’s maybe too little too late).)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-28 03:57:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630416807076020224

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630129208264650756