Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • There is nothing going on that isnt business as usual for keeping parties’ hands

    There is nothing going on that isnt business as usual for keeping parties’ hands clean. Paying someone for an NDA for many purposes, one in this case that as far as I know isn’t illegal, is just again, how we handle such matters in our legal and justice system. Now, you’re probably just naive and ignorant, but this kind of tedium is a daily occurrence everywhere, so that private matters are kept private, and corporate matters kept insulated from private matters.

    Reply addressees: @crcwilkinson @JesseBWatters @dbongino


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-05 02:04:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643434386530893825

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643432010331963395

  • At the same time? As far as I know that’s still illegal. Serial marriage however

    At the same time? As far as I know that’s still illegal.
    Serial marriage however is legal.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-04 03:40:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643096251192299523

    Reply addressees: @WoodworkerBear

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643095640514367488

  • Via My Good Friend @bryanbrey keeping a pulse on things. IMO it’s just very diff

    Via My Good Friend @bryanbrey keeping a pulse on things.
    IMO it’s just very difficult to see this change if for no other reason than rule of law draws currency, and we put rule of law first more than any other country. https://t.co/LsrszsfOF3


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:27:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643017312461545476

  • JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES (justice vs fairness vs equality vs

    JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
    (justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
    Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.

    The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.

    Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?

    Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.

    Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.

    The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.

    And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132890456064

  • JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES (justice vs fairness vs equality vs

    JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
    (justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
    Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.

    The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.

    Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?

    Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.

    Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.

    The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.

    And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132693213184

  • RT @StevePender: Rights (freedoms of action) are constructed in real time. They

    RT @StevePender: Rights (freedoms of action) are constructed in real time. They are not immovable assets, passively referenced, like a hous…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 08:47:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642810998762479617

  • If I want through your life with a fine tooth comb could I find a means of prose

    If I want through your life with a fine tooth comb could I find a means of prosecuting you? Almost certainly.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 01:10:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642333649495269376

    Reply addressees: @bestistleftist4 @kavadajj @JJ_McCullough

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642330460033302530

  • I am a scholar of the law and the consequences of political abuse of the law. Yo

    I am a scholar of the law and the consequences of political abuse of the law. You are not. You havent the faintest idea of what you are parroting under the pretense you do.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 14:41:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642175274648326144

    Reply addressees: @bestistleftist4 @kavadajj @JJ_McCullough

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642170601275113474

  • 1) It’s not a high crime, and violates the principle of innocence of post-presid

    1) It’s not a high crime, and violates the principle of innocence of post-presidential service.
    2) It’s selective prosecution, for political ends.
    3) It’s another example of using the state for political ends.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-01 00:19:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641958303612764161

    Reply addressees: @bestistleftist4 @kavadajj @JJ_McCullough

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641948913535008770

  • Good thing Joyce Vance White is just a prosecutor, not a judge, nor seated polit

    Good thing Joyce Vance White is just a prosecutor, not a judge, nor seated politician, nor a scholar of law, nor a theorist of jurisprudence. Because the people cannot be de facto sovereign without the arms to do so.

    Instead… What have you done, to create a school system, a family structure, a social structure, a political structure, an economy, a set of norms, belief, and mythos, that is producing so much mental illness, so much division, so much rage, that we see school shooters, or any other individual political violence?

    We know the answer, you know.
    You just can’t face it.
    And you’re the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 21:20:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641551067669307395

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640449328643710997