Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

Dating Mating And Marriage

Men aren’t scared. Women always project female emotions where men don’t have them. Instead, it’s that “the market for affection” has failed, and costs and risks of interacting with women are such that no effort at discovering a ‘coincidence of wants’ is worth the investment.

Men grasp that women live ‘within time’ and men live ‘across time’. That women seek consumption at lowest investment, and men seek capitalization at lowest investment. As such women demonstrate devotion in time but not loyalty over time, while men my vary devotion in time, they will maintain loyalty over time.

Men understand that most women are looking for entertainment (consumption) rather than investment in the production of a family. And even then, women will nearly always leave, and take have the men’s investments.

Then women can still pursue a new relationship by selling sex, affection and care, but men are no longer able to sell exclusivity of attention and investment to another woman.

And worse, it means men are impoverished in later age because women have thus not only extracted the capital material relationship, and caretaking capital that men produced, but prevented them from creating new capital.

Men understand that this system can’t continue because the rate of marital and reproductive collapse, and with it, men’s incentive to accumulate capital for themselves and for the polity, means the end of our political system, our economy, our various social security, and very likely our cohesion as a single territory.

Men are going to continue to go this direction ‘until market demand forces women to bring a different product to market’.

We are seeing the breakdown of the magical thinking of the feminists at the moment, just as we saw the breakdown of the marxist in the past. It may take a while to work through the population but it will do so.

Unfortunately, we are at the point where the combination of feminism and the collapse of reproduction, women’s advocacy of massive immigration and diversity, and the end of the developing world being technologically and economically behind, and are about to enter what appears to be a depression that will last a few decades, including a new technology that will largely affect women in administrivia roles.

So, I’m a little worried that just like the Italians, Germans, Russians, and Chinese, we’ll be beyond the point of demographic cultural economic and political recovery by the time that women’s behavior adapts to the new circumstances.

So as Machiavelli, the Romans, and the Spartans have warned us, inclusion of women in politics, like universal enfranchisement, simply poisons the well of responsibility upon which all civilizations depend for their persistence.

I think there is a solution to the problem of including women, and that’s simply the equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behavior as that of men. (Which is what our traditional western ethics sought and achieved.)

And from that perspective, the problem is fixable.

It’s just a question of whether we’re too late, or on time. 😉

Cheers
CD

MEN AREN’T SCARED – THEY’RE JUST RATIONAL
Men aren’t scared. Women always project female emotions where men don’t have them. It’s that “the market for affection” has failed, and costs and risks of interacting with women are such that no effort at discovering a ‘coincidence of wants’ is worth the investment.

Men grasp that women live ‘within time’ and men live ‘across time’. That women seek consumption at lowest investment, and men seek capitalization at lowest investment. As such women demonstrate devotion in time but not loyalty over time, while men my vary devotion in time, they will maintain loyalty over time.

Men understand that most women are looking for entertainment (consumption) rather than investment in the production of a family. And even then, women will nearly always leave, and take have the men’s investments.

Then women can still pursue a new relationship by selling sex, affection and care, but men are no longer able to sell exclusivity of attention and investment to another woman.

And worse, it means men are impoverished in later age because women have thus not only extracted the capital material relationship, and caretaking capital that men produced, but prevented them from creating new capital.

Men understand that this system can’t continue because the rate of marital and reproductive collapse, and with it, men’s incentive to accumulate capital for themselves and for the polity, means the end of our political system, our economy, our various social security, and very likely our cohesion as a single territory.

Men are going to continue to go this direction ‘until market demand forces women to bring a different product to market’.

We are seeing the breakdown of the magical thinking of the feminists at the moment, just as we saw the breakdown of the marxist in the past. It may take a while to work through the population but it will do so.

Unfortunately, we are at the point where the combination of feminism and the collapse of reproduction, women’s advocacy of massive immigration and diversity, and the end of the developing world being technologically and economically behind, and are about to enter what appears to be a depression that will last a few decades, including a new technology that will largely affect women in administrivia roles.

So, I’m a little worried that just like the Italians, Germans, Russians, and Chinese, we’ll be beyond the point of demographic cultural economic and political recovery by the time that women’s behavior adapts to the new circumstances.

So as Machiavelli, the Romans, and the Spartans have warned us, inclusion of women in politics, like universal enfranchisement, simply poisons the well of responsibility upon which all civilizations depend for their persistence.

I think there is a solution to the problem of including women, and that’s simply the equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behavior as that of men. (Which is what our traditional western ethics sought and achieved.)

And from that perspective, the problem is fixable. It’s just a question of whether we’re too late, or on time. 😉

Cheers
CD

Reply addressees: @WallStreetSilv