The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval, (O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R)allying, (S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing, (U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent. This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. FULL LIST (D)enial … (D)isapproval … … (O)utrage … … … (S)haming, … … … … (M)oralizing, … … … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … … … (R)allying … … … … … … … … (G)ossiping … … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing For the purpose of: … … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction. And and preserving: … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability) … … (S)elf Image … … … (S)tatus … … … … (F)ree Riding … … … … … (R)ent Seeking … … … … … … (C)oruption … … … … … … … (P)arasitism … … … … … … … … (P)redation With their act of: … … … … … … … … … … (F)raud. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. DIAGNOSIS So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts. ADDICTION Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover. —Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
What Does Gsrrm Stand For?” (Full Version)
The Female (herd) competitive strategy of circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (D)enial, (D)isapproval, (O)utrage, (G) ossiping, (R)allying, (S)haming, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing, (U)ndermining, to cause (R)eputation destruction, Ostracization, or Death and solving for (F)ace, consensus, or consent. This feminine strategy is in contrast with Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. FULL LIST (D)enial … (D)isapproval … … (O)utrage … … … (S)haming, … … … … (M)oralizing, … … … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … … … (R)allying … … … … … … … … (G)ossiping … … … … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing For the purpose of: … … … … … … … … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction. And and preserving: … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of Truth (Decidability) … … (S)elf Image … … … (S)tatus … … … … (F)ree Riding … … … … … (R)ent Seeking … … … … … … (C)oruption … … … … … … … (P)arasitism … … … … … … … … (P)redation With their act of: … … … … … … … … … … (F)raud. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of disapproving of, denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. DIAGNOSIS So discovering the lie is rather easy. It’s crime they commit, the fraud that the liars engage in, which provides them with the incentive to lie. This isn’t very difficult since the benefits of abrahamic deceit are all psychological comforts. ADDICTION Unfortunately, like all false comforts, whether psychotic(mental), ritual (religion), or chemical (drugs alcohol), the addiction is almost always incurable, and results in a life long struggle to recover. —Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute.
-
Why Do We Live in Different Mental Experiences?
—“My working understanding of Truth is that which stands as a spiritual Reality, iterations of which show up in the manifest world as the vast array of imperfections with which we live in our daily lives.”—Marguerite McKenna @Nalo_Nei
Spiritual combines (conflates) intuition and emotion. Human Cognitive Process: perceive stimuli … disambiguate, … … integrate(obj,space,scene), … … … auto-associate, … … … … auto-predict, … … … … … intuit relations, … … … … … … intuit valuations(emotion), … … … … … … … devote attention, … … … … … … … … Imagine(predict,model) … … … … … … … … … reason(permute), … … … … … … … … … … calculation(plan), … … … … … … … … … … … computation. Male bias Think / Female bias Feel. That’s what the brain does. Period. And all of us ‘live in’ some dominant experience between variation of the auto associative free-associative, imaginary-emotional(Aesthetic), and the (like me) completely Predictive-Analytical(Decidable). Division of labor cognitive so to speak.
—“And which part is observing the interplay you speak of?”—Can’t Stump the Trump @DeplorableDJDJ
Well, the question is, where do each of us specialize in performing auto association, prediction, valuation, focus, planning, and action? In other words, are we practicing consumption, exchange or production? Dorsal Sequence (hierarchy) of Labor: … Sensory, S-M, … … Motor(physical), M-E, … … … Executive, E-S, … … … … Social, S-F, … … … … … Focus, P-F, … … … … … … Plan, … … … … … … … Release Action … … … … … … … … > Recurse. Lateral: Prey(Perception-integration) vs Predator (Action-analysis). Diff Auto-Association … ->Diff in Prediction(imagination) … … -> Diff in Activity(value detection) … … … ->Diff in Attention … … … … -> Subjective(experience, conflate) … … … … vs … … … … -> Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate). Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite. And no it’s not a social construction. (a) brain structures vary (sometimes greatly) by gender (b) brain functions vary (sometimes greatly) by gender (c) in utero development failure produces ‘failures’. (d) early development, social development, trauma produce ‘failures’. So all of us can experience some or all of the spectrum but some of us bias the degree of agency (submission-experience(imagination)) vs (dominance-action) according one way or the other. As in all things we are very good at single dimension comprehension, and bad at multi. So for simple reduction: TABLE OF DIMENSIONS
1.Self ....................vs Others ....vs World;.......... 2.Sensory(aesthetes) ......vs Empathy ...vs Motor(athletes); 3.Internal(experience) ....vs Others ....vs External(action); 4.Consumption(Recreation,..vs.Trade .....vs Production...... ..............Submission)..(Interaction,....(Agency......... ...........................collaboration)....Dominance);.... 5.Short Term ..............vs Medium ..vs Long Term.........
In other words, we’re not only different, we evolved to specialize in collecting information across reproductive, productive, knowledge, and perception spectrums and cooperating and communicating to produce a market the equilibrium serving all Power, Pareto and Nash distributions. This means we not only parallel process vast amounts of information internally, but collectively through display word and deed. And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit. The Issue (Different Grammars of Expression) isn’t ‘just semantics’, but of our specializations, and the market of cooperation. My work requires greater suppression of falsehood, most people’s requires greater seizure of opportunity (with hope of no-falsehood) Because increases in precision placing increased burden on executive function, are cognitively and informational expensive.
-
Why Do We Live in Different Mental Experiences?
—“My working understanding of Truth is that which stands as a spiritual Reality, iterations of which show up in the manifest world as the vast array of imperfections with which we live in our daily lives.”—Marguerite McKenna @Nalo_Nei
Spiritual combines (conflates) intuition and emotion. Human Cognitive Process: perceive stimuli … disambiguate, … … integrate(obj,space,scene), … … … auto-associate, … … … … auto-predict, … … … … … intuit relations, … … … … … … intuit valuations(emotion), … … … … … … … devote attention, … … … … … … … … Imagine(predict,model) … … … … … … … … … reason(permute), … … … … … … … … … … calculation(plan), … … … … … … … … … … … computation. Male bias Think / Female bias Feel. That’s what the brain does. Period. And all of us ‘live in’ some dominant experience between variation of the auto associative free-associative, imaginary-emotional(Aesthetic), and the (like me) completely Predictive-Analytical(Decidable). Division of labor cognitive so to speak.
—“And which part is observing the interplay you speak of?”—Can’t Stump the Trump @DeplorableDJDJ
Well, the question is, where do each of us specialize in performing auto association, prediction, valuation, focus, planning, and action? In other words, are we practicing consumption, exchange or production? Dorsal Sequence (hierarchy) of Labor: … Sensory, S-M, … … Motor(physical), M-E, … … … Executive, E-S, … … … … Social, S-F, … … … … … Focus, P-F, … … … … … … Plan, … … … … … … … Release Action … … … … … … … … > Recurse. Lateral: Prey(Perception-integration) vs Predator (Action-analysis). Diff Auto-Association … ->Diff in Prediction(imagination) … … -> Diff in Activity(value detection) … … … ->Diff in Attention … … … … -> Subjective(experience, conflate) … … … … vs … … … … -> Executive (Plan Act Recuse Disambiguate). Female and Male cognitive stereotypes (as always) are correct at the general and at the extreme. However, w/ heavily overlapping, so we find a few males with female cog bias, and opposite. And no it’s not a social construction. (a) brain structures vary (sometimes greatly) by gender (b) brain functions vary (sometimes greatly) by gender (c) in utero development failure produces ‘failures’. (d) early development, social development, trauma produce ‘failures’. So all of us can experience some or all of the spectrum but some of us bias the degree of agency (submission-experience(imagination)) vs (dominance-action) according one way or the other. As in all things we are very good at single dimension comprehension, and bad at multi. So for simple reduction: TABLE OF DIMENSIONS
1.Self ....................vs Others ....vs World;.......... 2.Sensory(aesthetes) ......vs Empathy ...vs Motor(athletes); 3.Internal(experience) ....vs Others ....vs External(action); 4.Consumption(Recreation,..vs.Trade .....vs Production...... ..............Submission)..(Interaction,....(Agency......... ...........................collaboration)....Dominance);.... 5.Short Term ..............vs Medium ..vs Long Term.........
In other words, we’re not only different, we evolved to specialize in collecting information across reproductive, productive, knowledge, and perception spectrums and cooperating and communicating to produce a market the equilibrium serving all Power, Pareto and Nash distributions. This means we not only parallel process vast amounts of information internally, but collectively through display word and deed. And as in ANY MARKET, the velocity of transformation (‘prosperity’) is determined by the degree of expression of various wants in competition with the degree of suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictions, fraud and deceit. The Issue (Different Grammars of Expression) isn’t ‘just semantics’, but of our specializations, and the market of cooperation. My work requires greater suppression of falsehood, most people’s requires greater seizure of opportunity (with hope of no-falsehood) Because increases in precision placing increased burden on executive function, are cognitively and informational expensive.
-
Women in Our Arguments
Women in Our Arguments https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/women-in-our-arguments/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 16:59:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267138688032571396
-
Women in Our Arguments
Women in Our Arguments https://t.co/3er7ZoGFYv
-
Women in Our Arguments
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do). It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity. What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. ) Hugs. Edit
-
Women in Our Arguments
Oh. BTW: Women rarely engage in any of these arguments at the fundamental level – more to ‘fine tune’ our arguments – especially when we overdo it. (which we do). It’s MEN who use the female strategy of undermining(GSRRM) that are the usual target of our criticism – not women. So yeah, when we say “You’re using the female means of showing disapproval instead of argument to the truth or falsehood, reciprocity or irreciprocity of the argument – when and claiming you’re falsifying the argument.” So yes, it’s not just calling the opposition dishonest, but insulting his masculinity. What you’ll find here is that the primary difference between men and women is female cog bias of NAXALT (exceptions) because of the personal cog bias, and the male cog bias of Generalizations (distributions), because of the political cog bias. ) Hugs. Edit
-
You can’t run.
You can’t run. You can’t hide. You can only pretend your not surrendering. And you can only pretend you’re not surrendering to hide your cowardice. But you only hide it from yourself – not us, not the future. It is terribly easy to win. The cost to the population is high. The rewards are far higher however.
-
You can’t run.
You can’t run. You can’t hide. You can only pretend your not surrendering. And you can only pretend you’re not surrendering to hide your cowardice. But you only hide it from yourself – not us, not the future. It is terribly easy to win. The cost to the population is high. The rewards are far higher however.