IT’S AN UNJUST WAR – OUR UNPREPAREDNESS FOR THE FEMALE METHOD OF WARFARE.

—“Mr Doolittle … What we seem to be witnessing, the all out attack on the family has military, academic, political group feel about it. At least, just from the outside looking in. But what for? It’s an unjust war.”– @lughedd

Correct.

Here is how to understand our condition:

The European group evolutionary strategy is aristocratic and top down, meaning that (a) the prohibition on arbitrary authority (b) requires demonstrated responsibility for self capital, private capital, and common capital including behavioral capital, (c) in exchange for sovereignty, autonomy, and participatory decision making, as well as defense by rule of law under it.

Every time we lift up a new class of people into greater agency and influence they seek to preserve the irresponsibilities of their prior state despite the demands for responsibility in their new state.

Every time we allow to cohabitate, or try to integrate, a new ethnic and demographic population into our the greater agency and influence we have in our population, they seek to preserve the irresponsibilities of their prior state despite the demands for responsibilities in their new state.

We allowed two things to happen at the same time: the inclusion of women into the economy and into the political franchise at about the same time we allowed the introgression of postwar eastern jews into the polity.

We had no way of knowing that the female means of antisocial behavior evolved in the jews as their group evolutionary strategy – how they compete through ‘undermining’ and ‘social construction’ the same way women do.

We have never before encountered a set of competing elites with the female group evolutionary strategy. While we had barely integrated women, and, given that integration of any group takes at least three generations, the movement of both Eastern European Jews and the movement of the German Class marxists to the USA and switching to cultural marxism, sex marxism, and race marxism (by intent and design), the combination of an elite using the female method of warfare with a vast population of women who naturally intuit the ‘good’ of the female method of warfare, succeeded in the marxist tradition of ‘the march through the institutions of cultural production’ using women instead of men, at least, even if men produced most of the strategy, it was women voters and women in the economy especially in education and bureaucracy that made possible the warfare against our civilization.

So just as as the male warfare moved from physical to economic to now informational and now into artificial intelligence, has the female method of warfare moved from undermining, to social construction, to sedition, indoctrination, to treason, using the female strategy.

And, because our ‘rules of responsibility’ aren’t written down, only our rights, we had little way of defending ourselves from this new method of warfare.

So, in my work that’s what I do. I research. I write down our group strategy and reason for success. I explain what happened. And I revise our constitution, law, policy sector, financial sector, and education to not only defend against reoccurrence.

And you know… it took decades. Hopefully we will publish soon. It’s been an extraordinary amount of work.

Cheers
CD

Reply addressees: @Lughedd