SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION – AND CONSEQUENCES
Here is the short version:
1. Science consists of the process of discovering first principles(causes). We construct everything from chains of causality using first principles. It is a universal falsificationary logic.
2. The first cause and therefore first principle of human differences is sex differences. The second is degree of noetenic evolution (resulting in race) as neoteny is the direction of human evolution (domestication syndrome). The third is accumulated genetic load (resulting in class).
3. Sexes differ in cognition, speech, tactics, strategy, conflict, and warfare (see sex differences in antisocial behavior) with male force, fraud, and criminality and female manipulation, reputation destruction, and promiscuity.
4. Civilizations differ in their use of masculine and feminine strategy.
5. Religion(middle east) teaches lying and manipiulation. States (china) teach force and coercion, and Contractualism(law)(europe) teaches reciprocity and contract. (it’s much more complicated but that’s the simple version).
6) Sex differences function as a division of labor, time, and scale:
GIVEN Sex Differences in Cognition:
Feminine vs Masculine
Lateral (more) vs longitudinal Brain Organization (fast)
In Time (now) vs Over Time (then)
Direct (perceptible) vs Abstract (predicted) Causality
Empathizing vs Systematizing
Experience vs Consequence
HyperConsuming vs Capitalizing
Devotion in time vs Loyalty over time
Special Pleading/asymmetry vs Consistency/symmetry Status by Consumption w/o responsibility vs Status by Capitalizing with responsibility
Irresponsibility vs Responsibility for Commons
One/Few vs Populations/Many Small
Scale vs Large Scale
Prey(Submission) vs Preditor(Dominance)
Herd vs Packs Global vs National
Dysgenic vs Eugenic
Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)
AND GIVEN
Sex Differences in Limits:
Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
–vs–
Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.
AND GIVEN
Distribution of Sex Differences in the Population:
[masculine (systematizing) vs feminine (empathizing)] The distribution of traits is overlapping in the population distribution with a few cognitively feminine males and cognitively masculine females, as well a larger number of extreme males (autism) and extreme females (psychosis).
AS SUCH
Evolutionary Necessity of the Division of Cognition
Masculine conservatives perceive the world across time (reals) and feminine progressive perceive the world in time (feels). Progressive historians complain about history and conservative historians explain history.
Feminine in time vs Masculine over time.
Masculine minds will be better at everything at scale. But the feminine ability to intuitively manage many relationships and states of mind (children especially but other women as well is an equal advantage in the IN TIME domain.).
Unconstrained vs Constrained Visions (scarcity)
If the feminine mind did not hold the unconstrained vision, mothers would give up on their children. If the masculine mind did not hold the constrained vision, no group would survive the disorder. So, we see feminine opportunity and masculine scarcity. Evolution always divides the labor. Among humans it divides the cognitive labor of “TIME and SCALE”.
(Note: See Thomas Sowell: A Conflict of Visions)
Evolution of Differences in Cognition
Our findings are that all differences in cognition valuation and expression, other than those of genetic load or in-utero development, are caused by sex differences in the organization of the brain for the purpose of dividing the labor of the sexes into specializing in opposite time frames.
Why? Physics and Ternary Logic of the Universe.
Think of humans evolving from fast male sperm predator, and slow female egg prey if you want a humorous analogy to help you remember. But while easy to remember and somewhat humorous, the analogy is quite accurately the causality.
Explaining why this division of labor exists produces an origin of sex differences in physics and combined with differences in responsibility and status seeking provides the three causal properties that define human differences in behavior.
Nature likes ternary logic which is something we explore elsewhere if you want to twist your brain inside out on yet another issue. 😉
9) Methodology
Though our work is entirely based on the intersection between neuroscience – particularly over the past decade, and linguistic analysis (from computational linguistics) our methodology uses similar techniques to intelligence, personality, moral bias, and psychological bias testing, but we do so by constructing expression from the causality of the underlying organization of the brain (neurology) instead of deduction from from language alone. (Which has plagued psychology since its origin.)
Also See related: https://t.co/KNKUPjEub9… https://t.co/ZGJvdDhvdu… https://t.co/N6p8EyfyhQ… https://t.co/xzFbZa3qNq… https://t.co/K09FRiBZLs… https://t.co/W4ONTbyAbe
