You can’t imagine people like me and our peers even exist.
Dunning-Kruger Rules Your Life.
Reply addressees: @Mz2Much411 @Alitah_H @JustinNBurcaw @1TwinDog @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump @Blklivesmatter @Me
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
You can’t imagine people like me and our peers even exist. Dunning-Kruger Rules
-
You can’t imagine people like me and our peers even exist. Dunning-Kruger Rules
You can’t imagine people like me and our peers even exist.
Dunning-Kruger Rules Your Life.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-04 14:11:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268546000374894593
Reply addressees: @Mz2Much411 @Alitah_H @JustinNBurcaw @1TwinDog @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump @Blklivesmatter @Me
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268545650947489798
-
What Is the Truth of Social Sciences
—“And what is the truth?”—LuckySnake@evrythingstays
The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, because they survive daily falsification by millions of us. That said, data matches the stereotypes. But It wasn’t until genetics we knew why: Neoteny & Class Distribution. The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, resulting trait distributions, particularly conscientiousness and intelligence produce different ‘challenges’ in normalizing behavior between groups. Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, and political market values, determined by those traits, we are socially(normatively), economically(competitively), and politically (demands for commons), incompatible. This is why proximity creates hostility. Ergo, the only solution is separation, which would provide the incentives destroyed by the great society (socialist relocation) movement, for communities to produce norms, institutions, and elites suitable for those distributions.
-
What Is the Truth of Social Sciences
—“And what is the truth?”—LuckySnake@evrythingstays
The truth is social science is obvious because stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science, because they survive daily falsification by millions of us. That said, data matches the stereotypes. But It wasn’t until genetics we knew why: Neoteny & Class Distribution. The result being that rates and depths of sexual maturity, resulting agency, resulting trait distributions, particularly conscientiousness and intelligence produce different ‘challenges’ in normalizing behavior between groups. Given universal kin selection and ingroup bias, and given predictable hierarchy of sexual, social, economic, and political market values, determined by those traits, we are socially(normatively), economically(competitively), and politically (demands for commons), incompatible. This is why proximity creates hostility. Ergo, the only solution is separation, which would provide the incentives destroyed by the great society (socialist relocation) movement, for communities to produce norms, institutions, and elites suitable for those distributions.
-
Restore Soft Eugenics
Restore Soft Eugenics https://t.co/UvOYGHgcOD
-
Restore Soft Eugenics
Restore Soft Eugenics https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/04/restore-soft-eugenics/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-04 11:17:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268502129515233280
-
Restore Soft Eugenics
by Ryan Drummond June 1 at 11:32 AM ยท
“The industrial revolution eliminated natural selection, and we failed to continue natural selection with eugenics.” – Curt Doolittle/Eric Danelaw
This is absolutely correct. Until we restore soft eugenics in some capacity, as a means of safeguarding the high trust commons which has taken thousands of years to develop through the slow culling of the underclasses, we will sink ever further. Thanks to human agency, with its ability to increase, we had the capacity to achieve it at all…but also thanks to the natural starting point of human agency being incredibly low, whilst it takes incredible work to develop it, any hard work and good social results can be undone in as little as a generation or two if it isn’t consistently safeguarded or built upon further. We have failed to protect our agency.
-
Restore Soft Eugenics
by Ryan Drummond June 1 at 11:32 AM ยท
“The industrial revolution eliminated natural selection, and we failed to continue natural selection with eugenics.” – Curt Doolittle/Eric Danelaw
This is absolutely correct. Until we restore soft eugenics in some capacity, as a means of safeguarding the high trust commons which has taken thousands of years to develop through the slow culling of the underclasses, we will sink ever further. Thanks to human agency, with its ability to increase, we had the capacity to achieve it at all…but also thanks to the natural starting point of human agency being incredibly low, whilst it takes incredible work to develop it, any hard work and good social results can be undone in as little as a generation or two if it isn’t consistently safeguarded or built upon further. We have failed to protect our agency.
-
Couldn’t tell ๐ Did you know that the genetic difference between (feminine dysg
Couldn’t tell ๐ Did you know that the genetic difference between (feminine dysgenic) progressives and (masculine eugenic) conservatives, is the conservative disgust response? This explains why conservatives are better looking, have more kids, and find you disgusting (really).
Reply addressees: @Mz2Much411 @diamondisnt @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump -
Couldn’t tell ๐ Did you know that the genetic difference between (feminine dysg
Couldn’t tell ๐ Did you know that the genetic difference between (feminine dysgenic) progressives and (masculine eugenic) conservatives, is the conservative disgust response? This explains why conservatives are better looking, have more kids, and find you disgusting (really).
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-03 21:46:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268298053225779201
Reply addressees: @Mz2Much411 @diamondisnt @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1268296855596814337