He means that all sense, perception, intuition, prediction, reason, permutation, speech, and action relies upon marginal indifferences in human experience, because all those experiences are produced in homunculus form: using the body, mind, experience as measure:commensurability.
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
He means that all sense, perception, intuition, prediction, reason, permutation,
-
I use biological differences in brain structure, chemistry, the Big5/6 + Sex + I
I use biological differences in brain structure, chemistry, the Big5/6 + Sex + IQ. Sex differences in cognition. Here’s the chart I teach with. Peterson’s research is in the same areas, and is common knowledge in the field. He just combines it with counseling and literature. https://t.co/3ynMP1Z8SC
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 01:43:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271619099790053382
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271616548130689024
-
I use biological differences in brain structure, chemistry, the Big5/6 + Sex + I
I use biological differences in brain structure, chemistry, the Big5/6 + Sex + IQ. Sex differences in cognition. Here’s the chart I teach with. Peterson’s research is in the same areas, and is common knowledge in the field. He just combines it with counseling and literature. https://t.co/3ynMP1Z8SC
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness -
Peterson likes to use them because as a therapist it allows him to use cognitive
Peterson likes to use them because as a therapist it allows him to use cognitive behavioral therapy by suggestion thereby circumventing normal human resistance to persuasion.
It’s why myths work. Its why they teach. It’s why we use them. He’s just applied it to therapy
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 01:31:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271616105002434561
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271615831458435074
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness No, that’s not it. Its that anthropomorphism is the most intuitive system of measurement for man, requiring the least knowledge and experience, with similarity across civilizations, and when used in narratives can encode group strategy and a ‘logical’ paradigm within it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1271615831458435074
-
Peterson likes to use them because as a therapist it allows him to use cognitive
Peterson likes to use them because as a therapist it allows him to use cognitive behavioral therapy by suggestion thereby circumventing normal human resistance to persuasion.
It’s why myths work. Its why they teach. It’s why we use them. He’s just applied it to therapy
Reply addressees: @yat_es @Salamandrens @Outsideness -
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thin
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thinkers to rely less on others and more on our own reasoning, and worse, on ‘private reasoning’ and this creates an artificial sense of low numbers. The liberals are a tiny loud perecentage.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-13 00:49:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271605633104646146
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271586044471894016
-
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thin
It is in the nature of men, and especially conservative men, who are system thinkers to rely less on others and more on our own reasoning, and worse, on ‘private reasoning’ and this creates an artificial sense of low numbers. The liberals are a tiny loud perecentage.
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness -
( If this is for me: I know my job. I’m good at my job. And my job is to teach m
( If this is for me: I know my job. I’m good at my job. And my job is to teach masculine men by Adversarialism: King of the Hill Games. And the purpose of hyperbole for illustration is the same as the Kantian imperative, The Law and the Court: “What If Everyone Did This?” )
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-12 15:28:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271464384292937730
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1271447970324545537
-
( If this is for me: I know my job. I’m good at my job. And my job is to teach m
( If this is for me: I know my job. I’m good at my job. And my job is to teach masculine men by Adversarialism: King of the Hill Games. And the purpose of hyperbole for illustration is the same as the Kantian imperative, The Law and the Court: “What If Everyone Did This?” )
Reply addressees: @Salamandrens @yat_es @Outsideness -
–“Q: Curt, Is There a Secret to Running King of The Hill Games?”–
Well, first, the reason you do it is (a) it’s participatory, (b) it attracts interest, (c) people will respond with what they really intuit, believe, feel. (d) so you (my case) get to do research on the different positions people hold. people can’t report truthfully. it’s impossible. They can’t NOT defend their moral and cognitive biases. This is why the technique works for research. It’s very hard to lie (mislead) in KOTH games. It’s your genes talking. Second, You’re trying to start a fight. There is a sort of art to it. You have to frame it so that it could be interpreted either way, and it’s going to antagonize the audience no matter what position they hold. After that you try to just ask questions that keep the fight going. In other words, you have to pick a position (flag) that someone wants to defend. So, you’re setting up game. A sport. A competition. In this way you teach the audience by the the audience teaching each other without you really doing much ‘teaching’ at all. The hard part is trying to make sure the audience isn’t sure of which position you hold, so that they argue the idea or each other and not you. I use all three methods: neutral question, positive position, opposite position. And I try to frame the ‘game’ (question) differently each time. Even though I only use like two or three dozen themes. I think of it like running plays in football, running scenarios in paintball, running skirmishes in military training, running mock trials in court, or debating scenarios in MBA courses. Players learn. The Spectators Learn. It’s Adversarialism. How men need and want to learn. Cheers